Food sovereignty movement condemns arrest of Wangchuck, demands immediate release

By A Representative

India’s food sovereignty movement has strongly condemned the arrest of environmental and local governance activist Sonam Wangchuck, demanding his immediate and unconditional release along with others detained in Ladakh.

In a joint statement endorsed by a wide cross-section of activists, academics, farmers, researchers and citizens, the signatories said it was “a cruel joke” that a person who has been working for food sovereignty, self-reliance and environmental protection is being labelled anti-national. They argued that Wangchuck’s advocacy for sustainable food systems, local governance, and ecological protection aligns directly with the idea of atma nirbharata promoted by the government itself.

The statement recalled Wangchuck’s role in campaigns such as the boycott of Chinese products and expressed concern that his peaceful efforts are now being criminalised. It also drew parallels with the government’s handling of the 2020–21 farmers’ protests, accusing it of failing to engage in meaningful dialogue and instead resorting to repression.

The movement condemned both the violence against political party offices and vehicles on September 24, as well as the police firing on protesters that resulted in deaths. It rejected the government’s attempt to hold Wangchuck responsible for the violence, pointing out that he had been publicly appealing for peace at the time.

“We expect our governments to be responsive and sympathetic to the just demands of citizens, without inordinate and unjustifiable delays,” the statement said, adding that criticising the government should not be equated with being anti-national.

The food sovereignty network demanded the immediate release of Wangchuck and five others charged under the National Security Act, along with 44 others arrested in connection with the September 24 protests. It also called upon the Government of India to resume dialogue with Ladakhi representatives and address their demands for statehood and stronger local governance.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Reclaiming the self: Feminist consciousness in three poetic traditions

By Ravi Ranjan Savita Singh’s Main Kiski Aurat Hoon stands today as one of the most intellectually expansive works in contemporary Hindi poetry—a poem that begins with a seemingly simple question of women’s identity but unfolds into a profound meditation on selfhood, history, language, and human freedom. When read alongside Kishwar Naheed’s Hum Gunahgaar Auratein and Adrienne Rich’s Diving into the Wreck , Singh’s poem becomes part of a global feminist conversation that interrogates how identities are constructed, imposed, resisted, and ultimately re‑imagined.

Counterview

Search This Blog