Skip to main content

Civil society groups unite to oppose Rajasthan anti-conversion Bill, urge Governor to withhold assent

By A Representative 
A coalition of civil society organisations, rights groups and faith-based associations has strongly condemned the passage of the “Rajasthan Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion Bill, 2025” in the State Assembly on September 9, calling it draconian, unconstitutional and a direct attack on the fundamental rights of minorities. The statement was released at a press conference held at Vinoba Gyan Mandir, Jaipur, where representatives of more than a dozen organisations declared that they would actively lobby against the bill and urged the Governor not to grant assent, but instead refer it to the President of India under Article 200 of the Constitution.
The organisations argued that the Rajasthan bill is harsher and more invasive than existing anti-conversion laws in eleven states and violates Articles 14, 19, 21 and 25 of the Constitution. They noted that similar attempts in Rajasthan in 2006 and 2008 were blocked when the Governors of the time withheld assent and forwarded the bills to the President. The joint statement alleged that the law, far from protecting public order, will be used as a political tool by the ruling BJP to spread fear and hostility against minorities and to impose the ideological agenda of the Sangh Parivar.
Citing provisions that criminalise even ordinary discussions of faith as “allurement” and impose severe penalties ranging from seven years to life imprisonment with fines up to ₹30 lakh, the groups warned that the bill violates constitutional guarantees of freedom of conscience and the right to privacy. They pointed to Section 5, which introduces the concept of “love jihad” into the statute, as particularly dangerous, and criticised the exemption for so-called “reconversion to ancestral religion” as an attempt to privilege Hinduism while treating all other faiths as subordinate.
The statement also linked the passage of the bill with a spike in targeted violence. Since September 3, when the bill was reintroduced in the Assembly, at least ten incidents of attacks, harassment or arrests involving Christians have been reported across districts including Alwar, Hanumangarh, Dungarpur, Kotputli-Behror and Jaipur. The signatories alleged that police have largely sided with right-wing groups such as the Bajrang Dal and VHP, often refusing to file FIRs against them while arresting pastors and intimidating worshippers. Particularly troubling, they said, were repeated incidents in Pratap Nagar, Jaipur, within the Chief Minister’s own constituency.
The coalition announced a multi-pronged strategy to oppose the legislation, including meetings with the Governor, public rallies, inter-community dialogues, state-wide campaigns, signature and postcard drives, and legal challenges before the Supreme Court. They emphasised that the law would not withstand judicial scrutiny, citing both constitutional infirmities and legislative incompetence, as matters relating to religion and propagation fall within Union jurisdiction.
The statement concluded that the bill undermines India’s secular framework by criminalising the peaceful exercise of religious freedom and enabling majoritarian domination. The undersigned organisations included the Jaipur Christian Fellowship, Rajasthan Samagra Seva Sangh, PUCL, APCR Rajasthan, Rajasthan Buddhist Mahasangh, NFIW, AIDWA, Daman Pratirodh Andolan, Youth Buddhist Society of India, Jamaat-e-Islami Rajasthan, Jamiat Ulama-e-Hind, SDPI Rajasthan, Rajasthan Nagrik Manch, Dalit–Muslim Ekta Manch, Welfare Party of India (Rajasthan) and the Ambedkarite Party of India.

Comments

  1. Conversion of religion is not necessary; One can change one's opinions, views & beliefs and yet not convert one's religion. Conversion has many challenges, some for life & can be very dangerous. A scientific approach of Exploring Truth and Opting it is a Civil Right irrespective of religion

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

NOTE: Hateful, abusive comments won't be published. -- Editor

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Reclaiming the self: Feminist consciousness in three poetic traditions

By Ravi Ranjan   Savita Singh’s Main Kiski Aurat Hoon stands today as one of the most intellectually expansive works in contemporary Hindi poetry—a poem that begins with a seemingly simple question of women’s identity but unfolds into a profound meditation on selfhood, history, language, and human freedom. When read alongside Kishwar Naheed’s Hum Gunahgaar Auratein and Adrienne Rich’s Diving into the Wreck , Singh’s poem becomes part of a global feminist conversation that interrogates how identities are constructed, imposed, resisted, and ultimately re‑imagined.