Skip to main content

International Arvind Memorial Seminar explores modern fascism in depth

By Harsh Thakor* 
The seventh edition of the International Arvind Memorial Seminar, organized by the Arvind Institute of Marxist Studies, was held from December 28, 2024, to January 2, 2025, at the Sundarayya Vignana Kendram in Hyderabad. The seminar, titled "Fascism in the Twenty-First Century: Elements of Continuity and Change and the Question of Contemporary Proletarian Strategy," examined various dimensions of modern fascism and strategies for addressing its rise. The event concluded on January 2, 2025.
The seminar reflected on the contributions of late leaders Arvind and Meenakshi, emphasizing their commitment to social change and people’s emancipation. Over five days, speakers and participants from diverse backgrounds analyzed the historical and contemporary aspects of fascism through a Marxist lens.
Day 1: Understanding 21st-Century Fascism
Abhinav Sinha, a Marxist theorist and editor of Mazdoor Bigul, presented a paper titled "Fascism in the Twenty-First Century: Elements of Continuity and Change." He explored the distinctions between 21st-century fascism and the fascist regimes of 20th-century Europe, emphasizing its evolution and relevance to contemporary socio-political contexts. The session included a discussion on India's current political climate, with the Modi-Shah regime characterized as reflecting fascist tendencies.
Day 2: Judicial Trends and Global Neofascism
Supreme Court lawyer Colin Gonsalves delivered the keynote address, discussing the judiciary's diminishing role in safeguarding rights, particularly under the Modi government. Other presentations included PJ James’s analysis of global neofascism and Anand Singh's exploration of the rise of Hindutva ideology in India. Singh's paper traced the historical and institutional entrenchment of fascist tendencies, linking them to broader socio-political dynamics.
Day 3: Marxist Historiography and Postcolonial Perspectives
Shivani Kaul critically reassessed Marxist historiography on fascism, critiquing strategies like the Popular Front for their historical limitations. Another highlight was Nicolai Messerschmidt's paper on postcolonial interpretations of Hindu nationalism, which debated the applicability of Marxist theory in the Indian context. This sparked a lively exchange, with differing views on the role of class struggle in understanding fascism.
Day 4: Anti-Fascist Strategies and Global Parallels
Sunny Singh presented a critical analysis of anti-fascist strategies within the Indian communist movement, emphasizing the need for clarity in diagnosing the phenomenon of fascism. Jiselle Hannah from Australia Asia Worker Links shared insights on combating the rise of far-right movements in Australia, drawing parallels with India. Discussions also included critiques of Indian Marxian economist Prabhat Patnaik’s views and an analysis of fascism’s socio-economic roots.
Day 5: Concluding Debates and Cultural Dimensions
The final day featured debates on characterizing fascism in India, with contributions from international and domestic scholars. Eric Schmidt analyzed the Trump phenomenon in the U.S. as a reaction to capitalist crises, while Katyayani’s paper explored fascism’s monopolization of art and literature. Discussions also addressed the role of rural struggles and the intersection of caste and class in the Indian context.
Critical Reflections
While the seminar successfully stimulated discussions on contemporary fascism, some critiques emerged:
Limited attention was given to the agrarian crisis and its role in resistance movements, including the farmers’ struggles over Minimum Support Price (MSP).
The link between caste oppression and fascism, particularly the role of Brahmanical hierarchies, was underexplored.
The analysis of the Indian bourgeoisie was viewed as overly dismissive of its internal contradictions, such as the presence of progressive and national bourgeois segments.
Conclusion
The seminar offered a platform for diverse perspectives, fostering meaningful discussions on modern fascism. However, gaps in addressing specific socio-economic and caste-related dynamics highlighted areas for future exploration.
---
*Independent journalist, closely associated with the Arvind Memorial Trust

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Hoping against despair after Myanmar President’s visit to India

By Nava Thakuria  Myanmar President U Min Aung Hlaing’s five-day official visit to India from 30 May to 3 June 2026 drew attention both in New Delhi and in India’s northeastern region, where policymakers and residents closely follow developments in the neighbouring country. The visit was significant because it touched on several issues of mutual concern, including security cooperation, border management, connectivity projects, trade, and regional stability.

Beyond data: The economist who refused to remain in the ivory tower

By Vikas Meshram   There are few people who are born into privilege yet choose to dedicate their lives to the cause of the poor. Jean Drèze is one such individual. Born on January 22, 1959, in Leuven, Belgium, into the family of a distinguished economist, Drèze has become one of the most influential voices in the study of poverty, inequality, and social policy in India. Having lived in India since 1979, he adopted Indian citizenship in 2002 and has since played a pivotal role in shaping some of the country's most important welfare initiatives.