Skip to main content

L&T boss' 90 hrs statement: Homemakers spend over 12 hrs daily in managing household

By NS Venkataraman*
Recent remarks by the Chairman of Larsen & Toubro in India, suggesting that employees work 90 hours a week, have sparked significant debate. Trade unions, employee associations, and others have criticized the idea, labeling it impractical and inhumane. Similar suggestions in the past, such as one from a founder of Infosys, faced comparable criticism.
While these suggestions have been met with resistance, some argue that the intent behind them deserves consideration. The proponents of such ideas may be emphasizing a commitment to a strong work ethic and economic progress rather than proposing rigid, mandatory policies. These leaders, with decades of experience and a commitment to excellence, likely intended their comments to inspire reflection rather than dictate practices.
Working Long Hours: A Familiar Scenario
Long working hours are not uncommon in various segments of society. For example:
  • Homemakers in India often spend over 12 hours daily managing household responsibilities, including cooking, childcare, and other tasks.
  • Many working women balance office duties with significant domestic responsibilities after returning home.
  • Self-employed individuals, such as shopkeepers, hawkers, and small-scale entrepreneurs, frequently work 12 or more hours a day.
  • Agricultural workers and those in construction, security, and law enforcement often endure physically demanding, long hours. Military personnel in remote postings work tirelessly without regular breaks or family interactions.
These examples highlight that long hours are already a reality for many, though the nature of work and personal satisfaction may vary.
The Role of Work Satisfaction
When individuals derive personal satisfaction from their work, extended hours may feel less burdensome. Passionate engagement in one’s profession often transforms work into a source of fulfillment rather than fatigue.
Suggestions for a 90-hour workweek should not be misconstrued as a call to eliminate holidays or turn employees into machines. Rather, these ideas emphasize introspection on cultivating a sustained work ethic that aligns personal growth with the country's economic advancement.
A Call for Reflection, Not Legislation
It is important to note that such proposals are not intended as legislative mandates. They are invitations for individuals and organizations to reflect on their approach to work. Those who criticize these suggestions as extreme may be accustomed to rigidly structured working hours. Encouraging a mindset of dedication and adaptability, rather than clock-watching, could enhance productivity and overall quality of life.
In conclusion, while the idea of a 90-hour workweek may not resonate with everyone, the broader message is about fostering a culture of commitment and hard work. Understanding this perspective can help strike a balance between professional aspirations and personal well-being.
---
*Trustee, Nandini Voice For The Deprived, Chennai

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Hoping against despair after Myanmar President’s visit to India

By Nava Thakuria  Myanmar President U Min Aung Hlaing’s five-day official visit to India from 30 May to 3 June 2026 drew attention both in New Delhi and in India’s northeastern region, where policymakers and residents closely follow developments in the neighbouring country. The visit was significant because it touched on several issues of mutual concern, including security cooperation, border management, connectivity projects, trade, and regional stability.

Beyond data: The economist who refused to remain in the ivory tower

By Vikas Meshram   There are few people who are born into privilege yet choose to dedicate their lives to the cause of the poor. Jean Drèze is one such individual. Born on January 22, 1959, in Leuven, Belgium, into the family of a distinguished economist, Drèze has become one of the most influential voices in the study of poverty, inequality, and social policy in India. Having lived in India since 1979, he adopted Indian citizenship in 2002 and has since played a pivotal role in shaping some of the country's most important welfare initiatives.