Trump's stringent policies are likely to strain America's international relations further

By Vikas Meshram*

In November 2024, Donald Trump won the U.S. presidential election with a massive majority, marking the beginning of his second term as the 47th President of the United States. His return to power has been marked by several controversial decisions that are poised to significantly impact America's domestic and international policies, as well as global politics. His strategic approach highlights a strong inclination toward nationalism and protectionism.

One of Trump's first and most controversial decisions in this term was granting pardons to nearly 1,600 individuals involved in the January 2021 Capitol riots. While this move pleased his supporters, it faced widespread opposition across various quarters. Trump described these individuals as "patriots" who fought for the rights of the "real America." However, this decision has raised significant concerns about the autonomy of the judiciary.

Trump also decided to withdraw the United States from the World Health Organization (WHO), accusing it of failing to manage the COVID-19 pandemic effectively and showing bias toward China. Despite the U.S. being a major financial contributor to the WHO, this bold decision has far-reaching implications for global health initiatives, including programs targeting diseases like HIV/AIDS, malaria, and tuberculosis. The U.S. funds 18% of the WHO’s budget, and its withdrawal is expected to exacerbate challenges faced by global health programs.

Signing an order to withdraw from the 2015 Paris Climate Agreement, Trump targeted multilateralism, creating a new precedent. Since George W. Bush's withdrawal from the Kyoto Protocol in 2001, the U.S. has become the only country to exit climate agreements three times. Trump's second withdrawal, especially at a time when the world has recorded its first calendar year with temperatures exceeding 1.5°C, has drawn global disappointment.

The U.S., as the world's second-largest emitter of greenhouse gases and its most powerful economy, holds a significant responsibility for global climate leadership. However, with a history of reneging on such commitments, particularly under Trump, the world is questioning America's reliability in addressing climate change. By 2022, the U.S. had achieved only one-third of its 2030 emission reduction target. Trump's emphasis on fossil fuel production further threatens the global environment.

Trump has also taken a hardline stance on immigration, proposing to revoke the birthright citizenship of undocumented immigrants' children. This decision could have serious repercussions for immigrant families. Additionally, he has signaled stricter restrictions on immigration to the U.S.

Another controversial proposal is the imposition of a 100% import tariff on BRICS countries, including India. This decision could severely impact the economies of these nations, especially India, which plays a pivotal role in trade between the U.S. and BRICS countries. Indian exporters and importers could face significant setbacks.

Trump's second term has also been marked by unconventional and contentious proposals, such as claiming rights over the Panama Canal, incorporating Greenland into the U.S., and revoking rights for the transgender community. These proposals have sparked widespread debates and criticism.

One of his more polarizing proposals is the repeal of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees citizenship to all individuals born in the United States. While this decision could significantly impact immigrant families, it is expected to face extensive legal challenges.

Trump's stringent policies are likely to strain America's international relations further. Withdrawing from the Paris Agreement, exiting the WHO, and imposing tariffs on BRICS countries could tarnish the U.S.'s image in the global community. His prioritization of industrial growth over environmental concerns has long-term implications for global environmental crises.

Despite widespread criticism domestically and internationally, Trump enjoys immense popularity among his supporters. His second term has begun with a bold and unconventional agenda, making it a pivotal period in global politics. Moving forward, it will be essential to reassess America's policies and responsibilities to prioritize global cooperation and accountability. The long-term implications of Trump's decisions will become evident over time, but for now, his second term marks a significant chapter in international relations.

---

*Journalist

Comments

Was Netaji forced to alter face, die in obscurity in USSR in 1975? Was he so meek?

By Rajiv Shah This should sound almost hilarious. Not only did Subhas Chandra Bose not die in a plane crash in Taipei, nor was he the mysterious Gumnami Baba who reportedly passed away on 16 September 1985 in Ayodhya, but we are now told that he actually died in 1975—date unknown—“in oblivion” somewhere in the former Soviet Union. Which city? Moscow? No one seems to know.

Love letters in a lifelong war: Babusha Kohli’s resistance in verse

By Ravi Ranjan* “War does not determine who is right—only who is left.” Bertrand Russell’s words echo hauntingly in our times, and few contemporary Hindi poets embody this truth as profoundly as Babusha Kohli. Emerging from Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, Kohli has carved a unique space in literature by weaving together tenderness, protest, and philosophy across poetry, prose, and cinema. Her work is not merely artistic expression—it is resistance, refuge, and a call for peace.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Asbestos contamination in children’s products highlights global oversight gaps

By A Representative A commentary published by the International Ban Asbestos Secretariat (IBAS) has drawn attention to the challenges governments face in responding effectively to global public-health risks. In an article written by Laurie Kazan-Allen and published on March 5, 2026, the author examines how the discovery of asbestos contamination in children’s play products has raised questions about regulatory oversight and international product safety. The article opens by reflecting on lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic, noting that governments in several countries were slow to respond to early warning signs of the crisis. Referring to the experience of the United Kingdom, the author writes that delays in implementing protective measures contributed to “232,112 recorded deaths and over a million people suffering from long Covid.” The commentary uses this example to illustrate what it describes as the dangers of underestimating emerging threats. Attention then turns...

Echoes of Vietnam and Chile: The devastating cost of the I-A Axis in Iran

By Ram Puniyani The recent joint military actions by Israel and the United States against Iran have been devastating. Like all wars, this conflict is brutal to its core, leaving a trail of human suffering in its wake. The stated pretext for this aggression—the brutality of the Ayatollah Khamenei regime and its nuclear ambitions—clashes sharply with the reality of the diplomatic landscape. Iran had expressed a willingness to remain at the negotiating table, signaling a readiness to concede points emerging from dialogue.

Authoritarian destruction of the public sphere in Ecuador: Trumpism in action?

By Pilar Troya Fernández The situation in Ecuador under Daniel Noboa's government is one of authoritarianism advancing on several fronts simultaneously to consolidate neoliberalism and total submission to the US international agenda. These are not isolated measures, but rather a coordinated strategy that combines job insecurity, the dismantling of the welfare state, unrestricted access to mining, the continuation of oil exploitation without environmental considerations, the centralization of power through the financial suffocation of local governments, and the systematic criminalization of all forms of opposition and popular organization.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

The kitchen as prison: A feminist elegy for domestic slavery

By Garima Srivastava* Kumar Ambuj stands as one of the most incisive voices in contemporary Hindi poetry. His work, stripped of ornamentation, speaks directly to the lived realities of India’s marginalized—women, the rural poor, and those crushed under invisible forms of violence. His celebrated poem “Women Who Cook” (Khānā Banātī Striyāṃ) is not merely about food preparation; it is a searing indictment of patriarchal domestic structures that reduce women’s existence to endless, unpaid labour.

The price of silence: Why Modi won’t follow Shastri, appeal for sacrifice

By Arundhati Dhuru, Sandeep Pandey* In 1965, as India grappled with war and a crippling food crisis, Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri faced a United States that used wheat shipments under the PL-480 agreement as a lever to dictate Indian foreign policy. Shastri’s response remains legendary: he appealed to the nation to skip one meal a day. Millions of middle-class households complied, choosing temporary hunger over the sacrifice of national dignity. Today, India faces a modern equivalent in the energy sector, yet the leadership’s response stands in stark contrast to that era of self-reliance.

Search This Blog