Skip to main content

Why is cooperation between Cuba and Venezuela a US war target

By Carmen Navas Reyes
 
The relationship between Cuba and Venezuela transcends traditional diplomacy; it is a phenomenon of direct confrontation against imperialism and a model of cooperation between peoples that has transformed the geopolitics of the Caribbean and South America. This alliance is not a recent or improvised development; it has deep roots, and its destruction has become a primary strategic objective for the United States.
Background: Between Official Tension and Rebellious Inspiration
After the triumph of the Cuban Revolution in 1959, the initially cordial bilateral relationship deteriorated rapidly. With the fall of the Marcos Pérez Jiménez dictatorship and the rise of Rómulo Betancourt to power, Venezuela became Fidel Castro's main regional antagonist. The ‘Betancourt Doctrine,’aligned with Washington's interests, led to the breakdown of relations and spearheaded Cuba's expulsion from the OAS in 1962.
Tensions reached their peak with the landing at Machurucuto (1967), where a dozen Cuban military personnel and Venezuelan guerrillas attempted to start an insurgency on the coast of Miranda. This event was used by the Raúl Leoni administration and the US to consolidate the narrative of the Cuban Revolution as Venezuela's ‘external enemy’ and to advance the politics and military strategy of anti-communism in this country.
However, for the Venezuelan left, Cuba was always a beacon. Despite the repression of Punto Fijo democracy, the Sierra Maestra inspired a generation of young people who saw in that feat a model to follow. Movements such as the Revolutionary Left Movement (MIR) and the Armed Forces of National Liberation (FALN), under figures such as Fabricio Ojeda, sought to replicate ‘foquismo’ in the Venezuelan mountains, keeping alive an ideological link that resisted the subordination to the US mandate by successive governments.
1994: The Meeting That Changed History
14 December 1994 marked a turning point. Hugo Chávez, recently released from prison after the 1992 military rebellion, landed in Havana and was received with Head of State honors by Fidel Castro himself at the foot of the airplane stairs.
That calculated and visionary gesture not only legitimized Chávez as the future leader of the continental left, but also sowed the seeds of a political and personal relationship that would become the basis of an unprecedented strategic alliance.
The Bolivarian Revolution and the Cuban Revolution: A New Integration Model
With Chávez's arrival in power in 1999, rhetoric was transformed into concrete action. The Comprehensive Cooperation Agreement between Venezuela and Cuba, signed on 30 October 2000, became the cornerstone of this new stage. An unprecedented solidarity compensation mechanism was established: Venezuela guaranteed energy supplies to the island under fair financial conditions, while Cuba reciprocated with its most valuable capital: human talent and scientific advances.

This exchange gave rise to the Social Missions in Venezuela, the executive arm of Chavismo's social policy:
  • Barrio Adentro Mission: Brings free primary health care to the poorest corners of the country with thousands of Cuban doctors.
  • Robinson Mission: Eradicated illiteracy in Venezuela (recognized by UNESCO in 2005) through the ‘Yo, sí puedo’ (Yes, I can) method.
  • Misión Milagro: Restored sight to hundreds of thousands of Latin Americans through free eye surgery.
Beyond social issues, cooperation covered strategic areas such as the modernization of the identification system (SAIME), agricultural development, and the popularization of sports.
The Defense Alliance and the Cuban Martyr Heroes
The most sensitive and profound dimension of this alliance has been cooperation in security and defense. Cuba played a key role in restructuring the Bolivarian National Armed Force (FANB) and updating intelligence and counterintelligence doctrine, preparing the nation for asymmetric warfare scenarios.
It is in this context of combative brotherhood that the recent event of the 32 Cuban military cooperants killed in combat takes place. These men lost their lives on Venezuelan territory during the direct aggression perpetrated by the United States on 3 January, an operation that led to the kidnapping of President Nicolás Maduro and the First Lady and First Combatant, Cilia Flores.
This bloody event is not isolated; it responds to the historical internationalist mystique of the Cuban Revolution. It is the same vocation that led its fighters to Africa to fight for the liberation of Angola and Namibia and help defeat apartheid. Today, the death in combat of these 32 Cubans, along with more than 50 Venezuelan soldiers, definitively seals with blood a relationship of brotherhood between two peoples who, together, face the most violent and desperate phase of US imperialism.
---
This article was written by Globetrotter. Carmen Navas Reyes is a Venezuelan political scientist with a master's degree in Ecology for Human Development (UNESR). She is currently pursuing a doctorate in Our America Studies at the Rómulo Gallegos Latin American Studies Center Foundation (CELARG) in Venezuela. She is a member of the International Advisory Council of the Tricontinental Institute for Social Research

Comments

TRENDING

The Nazia Elahi Khan controversy and the normalisation of hate

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan   The registration of two FIRs in the Mumbai Metropolitan Region against BJP Minority Morcha leader and social media influencer Nazia Elahi Khan for allegedly making derogatory remarks about Prophet Muhammad is not merely another isolated controversy. It is a disturbing reminder of how hate speech and communal provocation have become increasingly normalised in contemporary India.

Congress leader Gohil "misinformed" about the OBC caste status of Modi, contend senior Gujarat academics

Shaktisinh Gohil By A Representative Did senior Gujarat Congress leader Shaktisinh Gohil display his poor understanding of the caste system in Gujarat when he declared that Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi does not belong to the other backward class (OBC) but to an upper caste? At least two top senior experts, known for their proficiency in sociology and history of Gujarat, have wondered “how could Gohil go so wrong” on Modi’s caste status. Gohil, who all-India Congress spokesperson, has created a ripple by “disclosing” that Modi included his caste, modh ghanchi, into the OBC list three months after he came to power through a government resolution dated January 1, 2002.

Hindu antecedent of Muslim Jinnah: His grandfather was Lohana-Thakkar, said to be Raghuvanshi descent of Lord Ram

By RK Misra* Nearly 70 years after his death, Muhammed Ali Jinnah’s portraits continue to adorn places like Aligarh Muslim University (AMU), Bombay High Court and Sabarmati Ashram in India. On the other hand, the Karachi Chamber of Commerce and Industry building’s foundation stone states that it was laid by Mahatma Gandhi in 1934.