Skip to main content

Gram sabhas across states reject VB-GRAMG Act, seek restoration of MGNREGA

By A Representative 
Gram Sabhas across several states used Republic Day observances on January 26 to register strong opposition to the VB-GRAMG Act and to demand the restoration and strengthening of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, 2005 (MGNREGA). MGNREGA workers and rural residents raised these demands through resolutions adopted in Gram Sabhas held in states including Jharkhand, Bihar, West Bengal, Karnataka, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu and Chhattisgarh.
A press release issued by the NREGA Sangharsh Morcha said, participants in the Gram Sabhas discussed the role played by MGNREGA over the past two decades in sustaining rural livelihoods, preventing distress migration and creating durable community assets. Workers reiterated that replacing a rights-based law guaranteeing employment on demand with a discretionary scheme subject to budgetary limits was unacceptable. In several locations, resolutions rejecting the VB-GRAMG Act and calling for the reinstatement of MGNREGA were formally passed and submitted, while in others, despite administrative obstacles, Gram Sabha members asserted their opposition to the new legislation. Reports of particularly strong participation came from Jharkhand, Bihar, West Bengal and Karnataka.
In Rajasthan, resolutions were passed in at least 120 panchayats across 35 blocks in 22 districts. Karnataka saw similar mobilisation, with at least 100 panchayats across 10 districts adopting resolutions rejecting the new law. Panchayats in Tamil Nadu, Bihar and Jharkhand also passed resolutions, and in Bihar, MGNREGA workers submitted objections to gram panchayat heads. In West Bengal, where MGNREGA work has reportedly been stalled for more than four years, large gatherings were reported at Gram Sabhas, with participants demanding the reinstatement and strengthening of the programme. High participation by women workers was noted across states, highlighting the importance of MGNREGA in supplementing household incomes and ensuring wage parity for women in rural areas.
Through the resolutions, Gram Sabhas demanded the immediate withdrawal of the VB-GRAMG Act, the restoration of MGNREGA, and the strengthening of the employment guarantee programme through adequate budgetary allocation, minimum wages, timely wage payments, the removal of what they described as arbitrary technological interventions, and full control of Gram Sabhas over its implementation.
However, it was also reported that Gram Sabhas were not held in many areas despite a government mandate to convene them annually on January 26. In several places, gram panchayat offices were closed or lacked authorised officials to receive resolutions. In some panchayats, Panchayat Development Officers reportedly declined to hold meetings, citing a lack of training on the new law, while in others officials were reluctant to recognise the resolutions as formal decisions of the Gram Sabha.
As awareness of the provisions of the VB-GRAMG Act grows, workers’ organisations said opposition to the law is increasing, with concerns that it reduces the right to work to a discretionary benefit. Unions and workers’ groups have announced plans for a series of protests over the coming weeks, including demonstrations at panchayat offices, district headquarters, state capitals and in New Delhi. Protest marches are planned on January 30, the death anniversary of Mahatma Gandhi, followed by large-scale protests and maha-panchayats on February 2, marking the 20th anniversary of the launch of MGNREGA. A nationwide strike has also been announced for February 12, with demands including the repeal of the VB-GRAMG Act, the repeal of four labour codes, and the restoration of a strengthened MGNREGA.

Comments

TRENDING

The Nazia Elahi Khan controversy and the normalisation of hate

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan   The registration of two FIRs in the Mumbai Metropolitan Region against BJP Minority Morcha leader and social media influencer Nazia Elahi Khan for allegedly making derogatory remarks about Prophet Muhammad is not merely another isolated controversy. It is a disturbing reminder of how hate speech and communal provocation have become increasingly normalised in contemporary India.

Congress leader Gohil "misinformed" about the OBC caste status of Modi, contend senior Gujarat academics

Shaktisinh Gohil By A Representative Did senior Gujarat Congress leader Shaktisinh Gohil display his poor understanding of the caste system in Gujarat when he declared that Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi does not belong to the other backward class (OBC) but to an upper caste? At least two top senior experts, known for their proficiency in sociology and history of Gujarat, have wondered “how could Gohil go so wrong” on Modi’s caste status. Gohil, who all-India Congress spokesperson, has created a ripple by “disclosing” that Modi included his caste, modh ghanchi, into the OBC list three months after he came to power through a government resolution dated January 1, 2002.

Hindu antecedent of Muslim Jinnah: His grandfather was Lohana-Thakkar, said to be Raghuvanshi descent of Lord Ram

By RK Misra* Nearly 70 years after his death, Muhammed Ali Jinnah’s portraits continue to adorn places like Aligarh Muslim University (AMU), Bombay High Court and Sabarmati Ashram in India. On the other hand, the Karachi Chamber of Commerce and Industry building’s foundation stone states that it was laid by Mahatma Gandhi in 1934.