Skip to main content

Report exposes human rights gaps in India's $36 billion garment export industry

By Jag Jivan  
 
A new report sheds light on the urgent human rights challenges within India’s vast textile and garment industry, as global regulations increasingly demand corporate accountability in supply chains. Titled “Beneath the Seams,” the study reveals that despite the sector employing over 45 million people, systemic issues of poverty wages, unfair purchasing practices, and the exclusion of workers from decision-making persist, leaving millions vulnerable.
The report, published by Change Alliance and the Fair Trade Advocacy Office, consolidates findings from multi-stakeholder workshops held in Delhi, Bengaluru, and Tiruppur. It comes at a critical time as laws like the European Union’s Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) begin to mandate human rights and environmental due diligence for companies operating in the EU market, directly impacting major exporting nations like India.
A central finding is the widespread confusion and failure to ensure living wages and incomes. The report highlights a critical gap between the legally mandated minimum wage and a living wage that covers basic needs like food, housing, and healthcare. Workers, suppliers, and even factory management often conflate the two concepts.
Suppliers stated they cannot raise wages unless brands pay fairer prices, while brands’ public commitments to living wages frequently fail to be integrated into binding contracts or costing models. The result is that many workers, a majority of whom are women and migrants, remain trapped in poverty despite full-time employment.
Exploitative purchasing practices by international brands were identified as a root cause of poor working conditions. Practices such as demanding rapid deliveries at low costs, last-minute order changes, and order cancellations—exemplified during the COVID-19 pandemic—transfer all financial risk to suppliers. This pressure leads to wage suppression, forced overtime, and widespread subcontracting to informal units where worker protections vanish. Furthermore, when brands face compliance issues, they often resort to abrupt “cut-and-run” disengagement, leaving workers jobless without compensation, as there is no binding framework for responsible exit.
The report also underscores a profound lack of meaningful engagement with the workers and communities at the heart of the supply chain. Existing grievance mechanisms, like Internal Complaints Committees, are widely distrusted, with workers fearing retaliation. Social audits are costly yet have limited impact, often conducted without genuine worker involvement. Women and migrant workers are systematically excluded from decision-making processes, and trade unions face shrinking space in dialogues, sometimes being stigmatised as “anti-business.”
The report calls for decisive action from multiple stakeholders. It urges the Indian and other South Asian governments to strengthen laws, enforce living wages, protect informal workers, and restart comprehensive labour data collection. For the European Union, it recommends ensuring the CSDDD mandates full supply chain coverage, bans unfair purchasing practices, and requires meaningful stakeholder consultation and responsible disengagement. International institutions are called upon to promote living wage standards, support worker participation, and improve grievance mechanisms.
The document concludes that without binding legislation, shared financial responsibility, and a fundamental shift to include workers’ voices, new due diligence laws risk becoming another compliance exercise that fails to improve lives on the ground. As one workshop participant noted, the disconnect is stark: “The government talks about ‘ease of doing business’ but ignores ‘ease of living’ for workers.” The report positions the current moment as a pivotal opportunity to reshape the industry into one that is equitable, sustainable, and respectful of the rights of the millions who fuel its global success.

Comments

TRENDING

The Nazia Elahi Khan controversy and the normalisation of hate

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan   The registration of two FIRs in the Mumbai Metropolitan Region against BJP Minority Morcha leader and social media influencer Nazia Elahi Khan for allegedly making derogatory remarks about Prophet Muhammad is not merely another isolated controversy. It is a disturbing reminder of how hate speech and communal provocation have become increasingly normalised in contemporary India.

Congress leader Gohil "misinformed" about the OBC caste status of Modi, contend senior Gujarat academics

Shaktisinh Gohil By A Representative Did senior Gujarat Congress leader Shaktisinh Gohil display his poor understanding of the caste system in Gujarat when he declared that Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi does not belong to the other backward class (OBC) but to an upper caste? At least two top senior experts, known for their proficiency in sociology and history of Gujarat, have wondered “how could Gohil go so wrong” on Modi’s caste status. Gohil, who all-India Congress spokesperson, has created a ripple by “disclosing” that Modi included his caste, modh ghanchi, into the OBC list three months after he came to power through a government resolution dated January 1, 2002.

Hindu antecedent of Muslim Jinnah: His grandfather was Lohana-Thakkar, said to be Raghuvanshi descent of Lord Ram

By RK Misra* Nearly 70 years after his death, Muhammed Ali Jinnah’s portraits continue to adorn places like Aligarh Muslim University (AMU), Bombay High Court and Sabarmati Ashram in India. On the other hand, the Karachi Chamber of Commerce and Industry building’s foundation stone states that it was laid by Mahatma Gandhi in 1934.