Skip to main content

Beyond the verdict: Unnao rape case and the long shadow of intimidation

By Bharat Dogra 
Public sympathy for a woman who was sexually assaulted as a minor in 2017 has been growing steadily across India. At the same time, anger against the main accused has intensified as more people become aware of the prolonged suffering endured by the survivor and her family, who continue to face threats allegedly linked to powerful interests.
On December 25, The Indian Express reported that public outrage has increased following the Delhi High Court’s decision to suspend the life sentence of former MLA Kuldeep Sengar in the Unnao rape case involving a minor. The report noted that Sengar remains in prison due to a separate conviction related to the custodial death of the victim’s father, for which he was sentenced to 10 years’ imprisonment for culpable homicide not amounting to murder.
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has since stated that it will file a special leave petition before the Supreme Court at the earliest against the High Court’s order granting bail to Sengar. The agency also clarified that it had opposed Sengar’s bail application during earlier proceedings.
Meanwhile, the survivor and her family members have reiterated that they continue to face threats, either directly from the convicted individual or from those allegedly acting on his behalf. These concerns acquire added significance when the sequence of events over the past several years is examined closely.
On December 25, Dainik Bhaskar, a leading Hindi daily, published a detailed timeline of developments related to the case, beginning with the crime committed on June 4, 2017, when the minor girl from a poor family reportedly approached Sengar seeking employment. On June 20, 2017, the victim and her father lodged an FIR against him. On April 3, 2018, complaints were filed against the victim’s father by persons allegedly linked to Sengar, leading to his arrest. Six days later, on April 9, 2018, the victim’s father died in police custody.
In 2018, a witness connected to the custodial death reportedly died under mysterious circumstances. In July 2019, the victim’s uncle was sentenced to 10 years’ imprisonment in a separate case. On July 28, 2019, a road accident involving a truck resulted in the deaths of two of the victim’s aunts, while the victim and her lawyer sustained serious injuries. This occurred months before Sengar was sentenced to life imprisonment on December 19, 2019. A day later, on December 20, the injured lawyer succumbed to his injuries.
The pattern of deaths and serious injuries involving the victim’s family members, a key witness, and a lawyer associated with the case raises disturbing questions. These incidents do not appear to be isolated or unrelated. Rather, they suggest the possibility of systematic intimidation or violence aimed at silencing those connected to the pursuit of justice in this case. This underscores the need for a wider and deeper investigation to uncover all dimensions of the alleged criminal activities involved.
History offers parallels where a series of unexplained deaths surrounding a major case prompted broader scrutiny. Following the assassination of U.S. President John F. Kennedy, multiple witnesses and individuals connected to the investigation died under unusual circumstances, leading to serious public debate about the likelihood of such events being purely coincidental. Statistical analyses conducted at the time suggested that the probability of these deaths being entirely unrelated was extremely low.
Similarly, in the present case, it is imperative to thoroughly investigate all deaths and injuries occurring under suspicious circumstances involving those closely associated with the survivor’s pursuit of justice. Equally important is ensuring comprehensive protection and support for the survivor and her family.
This case has assumed wider significance in the context of women’s safety and the integrity of the justice system in India. The public will be watching closely to see whether the survivor and her family ultimately receive justice, protection, and closure.
---
The writer is Honorary Convener, Campaign to Save Earth Now. His recent books include Protecting Earth for Children, Man over Machine, When the Two Streams Met, and A Day in 2071

Comments

TRENDING

From Kerala to Bangladesh: Lynching highlights deep social faultlines

By A Representative   The recent incidents of mob lynching—one in Bangladesh involving a Hindu citizen and another in Kerala where a man was killed after being mistaken for a “Bangladeshi”—have sparked outrage and calls for accountability.  

Gram sabha as reformer: Mandla’s quiet challenge to the liquor economy

By Raj Kumar Sinha*  This year, the Union Ministry of Panchayati Raj is organising a two-day PESA Mahotsav in Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, on 23–24 December 2025. The event marks the passage of the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 (PESA), enacted by Parliament on 24 December 1996 to establish self-governance in Fifth Schedule areas. Scheduled Areas are those notified by the President of India under Article 244(1) read with the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution, which provides for a distinct framework of governance recognising the autonomy of tribal regions. At present, Fifth Schedule areas exist in ten states: Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Odisha, Rajasthan and Telangana. The PESA Act, 1996 empowers Gram Sabhas—the village assemblies—as the foundation of self-rule in these areas. Among the many powers devolved to them is the authority to take decisions on local matters, including the regulation...

MG-NREGA: A global model still waiting to be fully implemented

By Bharat Dogra  When the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MG-NREGA) was introduced in India nearly two decades ago, it drew worldwide attention. The reason was evident. At a time when states across much of the world were retreating from responsibility for livelihoods and welfare, the world’s second most populous country—with nearly two-thirds of its people living in rural or semi-rural areas—committed itself to guaranteeing 100 days of employment a year to its rural population.

When a city rebuilt forgets its builders: Migrant workers’ struggle for sanitation in Bhuj

Khasra Ground site By Aseem Mishra*  Access to safe drinking water and sanitation is not a privilege—it is a fundamental human right. This principle has been unequivocally recognised by the United Nations and repeatedly affirmed by the Supreme Court of India as intrinsic to the right to life and dignity under Article 21 of the Constitution. Yet, for thousands of migrant workers living in Bhuj, this right remains elusive, exposing a troubling disconnect between constitutional guarantees, policy declarations, and lived reality.

Policy changes in rural employment scheme and the politics of nomenclature

By N.S. Venkataraman*  The Government of India has introduced a revised rural employment programme by fine-tuning the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), which has been in operation for nearly two decades. The MGNREGA scheme guarantees 100 days of employment annually to rural households and has primarily benefited populations in rural areas. The revised programme has been named VB-G RAM–G (Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission – Gramin). The government has stated that the revised scheme incorporates several structural changes, including an increase in guaranteed employment from 100 to 125 days, modifications in the financing pattern, provisions to strengthen unemployment allowances, and penalties for delays in wage payments. Given the extent of these changes, the government has argued that a new name is required to distinguish the revised programme from the existing MGNREGA framework. As has been witnessed in recent years, the introdu...

Rollback of right to work? VB–GRAM G Bill 'dilutes' statutory employment guarantee

By A Representative   The Right to Food Campaign has strongly condemned the passage of the Viksit Bharat – Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) (VB–GRAM G) Bill, 2025, describing it as a major rollback of workers’ rights and a fundamental dilution of the statutory Right to Work guaranteed under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA). In a statement, the Campaign termed the repeal of MGNREGA a “dark day for workers’ rights” and accused the government of converting a legally enforceable, demand-based employment guarantee into a centralised, discretionary welfare scheme.

'Structural sabotage': Concern over sector-limited job guarantee in new employment law

By A Representative   The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has raised concerns over the passage of the Viksit Bharat – Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (VB–G RAM G), which was approved during the recently concluded session of Parliament amid protests by opposition members. The legislation is intended to replace the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA).

Making rigid distinctions between Indian and foreign 'historically untenable'

By A Representative   Oral historian, filmmaker and cultural conservationist Sohail Hashmi has said that everyday practices related to attire, food and architecture in India reflect long histories of interaction and adaptation rather than rigid or exclusionary ideas of identity. He was speaking at a webinar organised by the Indian History Forum (IHF).

'Festive cheer fades': India’s housing market hits 17‑quarter slump, sales drop 16% in Q4 2025

By A Representative   Housing sales across India’s nine major real estate markets fell to a 17‑quarter low in the October–December period of 2025, with overall absorption dropping 16% year‑on‑year to 98,019 units, according to NSE‑listed analytics firm PropEquity. This marks the weakest quarter since Q3 2021, despite the festive season that usually drives demand. On a sequential basis, sales slipped 2%, while new launches contracted by 4%.