Skip to main content

Miles without milestones: A critical look at India’s foreign policy under Prime Minister Modi

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak*  
Travel connects the traveler with the destination, giving meaning to both the journey and the path. When there is a disconnect between the traveler, the road, and the destination, the journey becomes directionless. In politics, the value of international travel lies in the tangible and intangible dividends it yields—economic partnerships, diplomatic alliances, cultural exchanges, and strategic cooperation. It is not the frequency of travel that matters, but the depth of engagement and the outcomes achieved. Meaningful travel contributes to national interests through collective memories, friendships, and shared values.
Between March 27, 2021, and September 1, 2025, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi made thirty-five foreign trips, visiting nearly sixty countries. From June 16, 2014, to November 13, 2019, he undertook fifty-eight trips, covering almost 110 countries. In total, approximately ninety-three foreign visits were made between 2014 and 2021. These included ten visits to the United States; eight each to France and Japan; seven each to the UAE and Russia; six each to China and Germany; five each to Nepal and Singapore; and four each to the United Kingdom, Brazil, and Sri Lanka. Other countries such as Bhutan, Indonesia, the Maldives, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Thailand, and Uzbekistan were visited three times each, with many others visited once or twice. This extensive travel has led to the informal moniker of a “Non-Resident Indian Prime Minister.”
Despite these frequent visits, India’s bilateral relations with key partners have not significantly improved. Indo–U.S. relations, for instance, have faced challenges in trade, defense, and diplomacy. While ideological admiration for Western powers has been evident, it has not translated into stronger strategic ties. The United States continues to impose high tariffs and exert influence over India’s relationships with other nations, including Russia and Pakistan. Diplomatic gestures and public camaraderie have not yielded substantial policy outcomes.
Engagement with the European Union has similarly fallen short. Despite extensive travel across Europe, India’s trade, security, and scientific collaborations remain underdeveloped. Public praise from European leaders often contrasts with actions that undermine India’s interests. The recent free trade agreement with Britain has raised concerns over its fairness and long-term impact on India’s economy.
India’s neighborhood policy has weakened, even as traditional allies in Africa, Latin America, and the former Soviet bloc maintain goodwill. This support persists despite India’s increasing alignment with Western powers that have historically opposed the interests of developing nations. These powers promote authoritarian regimes, exploit markets under the guise of free trade, and fuel instability for resource extraction. Yet, admiration for Western models remains strong within India’s current foreign policy framework.
The ideological orientation of India’s foreign policy has shifted away from its anti-colonial and non-aligned roots. The sidelining of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM), once a cornerstone of India’s international strategy, marks a significant departure from principles of peaceful coexistence and solidarity with developing nations. This shift has affected India’s global standing and its ability to advocate for equitable international norms.
Ultimately, the effectiveness of foreign travel in diplomacy should be measured by its contribution to national interests. The outcomes of India’s current foreign policy suggest that international visits have prioritized image-building over substantive gains. Despite high-profile meetings and symbolic gestures, India has struggled to forge new alliances or deepen existing ones. The frequent travel has not translated into meaningful milestones.
Reviving India’s international image and protecting its interests requires more than a change in leadership—it demands a reorientation of foreign policy away from ideological rigidity and toward pragmatic engagement. Rebuilding relationships rooted in historic solidarities and shared struggles against colonialism, capitalism, and imperialism is essential for restoring India’s role as a leader among developing nations.
---
*Academic based in UK

Comments

TRENDING

Gujarat Sachivalaya blacklists, denies entry to woman social activist: Will NHRC probe?

By Kantilal Parmar*  I have approached the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) seeking an independent, impartial, and transparent investigation into a serious incident that took place at the Gujarat Secretariat in Gandhinagar on August 18, 2026. The matter concerns social activist and women’s rights leader Chandrikaben Solanki, who, according to the information available to me, was denied an entry pass to the Secretariat when she went there to meet Gujarat’s Social Justice and Empowerment Minister, Dr. Manishaben Vakil, to raise an issue concerning social justice.

Tibetan activist’s self-immolation sparks fresh concerns over cultural rights

By Kumar Krishnan*  The question of Tibet has once again entered international discourse, raising difficult questions about human rights, religious freedom, cultural identity, language, and the relationship between political power and the rights of indigenous communities. On 20 August 2026, the Kashag and the Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile jointly organised a solidarity prayer service and peace march to mark the 49th day since the death of Lobga Rangzen, a Tibetan activist who died after self-immolating on 2 July in front of the United Nations Headquarters in New York.

IMF's policies 'stabilise' external creditors' balance sheets, 'generate' crisis in Africa

By Grieve Chelwa, Vijay Prashad   Across Africa, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) presents itself as the custodian of macroeconomic stability. Its latest Article IV staff reports on Ethiopia . Malawi , Nigeria , South Africa , and Zambia are written for economies with very different histories and institutions. Yet they converge on a familiar prescription: fiscal consolidation, tighter monetary policy, market-determined exchange rates, subsidy reform, deregulation and ‘private-sector-led growth’. No serious economist can dismiss macroeconomic stability.