Skip to main content

California governor faces criticism over veto of Bill protecting diaspora communities

By A Representative 
California Governor Gavin Newsom’s decision to veto Senate Bill 509, which aimed to protect residents from transnational repression by foreign governments, has sparked concern among several civil rights and diaspora groups. The bill, introduced by Senator Anna Caballero and co-authored by Assembly members Jasmeet Bains and Esmeralda Soria, was designed to safeguard activists and diaspora communities from intimidation, surveillance, and other forms of harassment orchestrated by overseas authorities. It had passed both the California Senate and Assembly with broad support.
The Indian American Muslim Council (IAMC), a Washington D.C.-based advocacy organization, voiced disappointment at the veto, calling it “a dangerous decision that leaves all Californians, from activists to everyday community members, vulnerable to repression, intimidation, and violence by foreign actors.” IAMC President Mohammed Jawad said the governor’s decision ignored “well-documented threats of violence and assassination directed against our community by the Indian government.”
The proposed legislation described transnational repression as a form of human rights violation used by some foreign governments to silence dissent and extend control over diaspora populations. It cited tactics such as extrajudicial killings, coercion of family members, online harassment, and targeted surveillance.
IAMC and other advocacy groups have previously alleged that Indian authorities have attempted to suppress dissent among expatriate communities. The organization’s report earlier this year detailed testimonies from Kashmiri and Muslim activists whose families were allegedly threatened by Indian officials and accused Indian consulates of facilitating intimidation efforts abroad.
Newsom’s veto comes amid ongoing debate over California’s approach to protecting vulnerable diaspora groups. In 2023, the governor also rejected SB403, a bill that sought to prohibit caste-based discrimination, which had similarly faced opposition from certain Hindu American groups.
IAMC said it would continue to advocate “alongside our allies for the safety and security of all Americans from transnational repression.”

Comments

TRENDING

Retired civil servants slam CJI’s remarks on environmental litigants

By A Representative   An open letter issued on May 22, 2026, by the Constitutional Conduct Group (CCG), comprising 71 retired civil servants from the All India and Central Services, has strongly criticized recent remarks made by the Chief Justice of India (CJI) against environmental litigants. 

The farmer's burden: How oil, war, and climate are rewriting the price of food

By Vikas Meshram   The scorching flames of the Middle East conflict are now slowly reaching the kitchens of ordinary people. The true price of this war is paid in daily markets, vegetable shops, and in the shattered minds of farmers. Expensive crude oil, skyrocketing fertilizer prices, and rising agricultural costs are together creating the conditions for global food inflation — and this crisis is directly tied to what people eat and drink every day.

Economic nationalism under strain as Indian corporates turn to America

By Sandeep Pandey*  U.S. federal prosecutors withdrew a criminal case involving allegations that Gautam Adani had bribed officials in India to secure solar energy projects, stating that they lacked sufficient evidence. Gautam Adani and his nephew Sagar Adani also settled a civil fraud case with the Securities and Exchange Commission by paying a fine of around ₹180 crore without admitting wrongdoing. In addition, Adani Enterprises reportedly deposited around ₹2,750 crore into the U.S. Treasury to resolve allegations that it had violated U.S. sanctions on Iran through purchases of Iranian liquefied petroleum gas (LPG).