California governor faces criticism over veto of Bill protecting diaspora communities

By A Representative

’s decision to veto , which aimed to protect residents from by foreign governments, has sparked concern among several civil rights and . The bill, introduced by and co-authored by and , was designed to safeguard activists and diaspora communities from intimidation, surveillance, and other forms of harassment orchestrated by overseas authorities. It had passed both the California Senate and Assembly with broad support.

The Indian American Muslim Council (IAMC), a Washington D.C.-based advocacy organization, voiced disappointment at the veto, calling it “a dangerous decision that leaves all Californians, from activists to everyday community members, vulnerable to repression, intimidation, and violence by foreign actors.” said the governor’s decision ignored “well-documented threats of violence and assassination directed against our community by the .”

The proposed legislation described transnational repression as a form of human rights violation used by some foreign governments to silence dissent and extend control over diaspora populations. It cited tactics such as extrajudicial killings, coercion of family members, online harassment, and targeted surveillance.

IAMC and other advocacy groups have previously alleged that Indian authorities have attempted to suppress dissent among expatriate communities. The organization’s report earlier this year detailed testimonies from and whose families were allegedly threatened by and accused of facilitating intimidation efforts abroad.

Newsom’s veto comes amid ongoing debate over California’s approach to protecting vulnerable diaspora groups. In 2023, the governor also rejected , a bill that sought to prohibit , which had similarly faced opposition from certain .

IAMC said it would continue to advocate “alongside our allies for the safety and security of all Americans from transnational repression.”

Gujarat Sachivalaya blacklists, denies entry to woman social activist: Will NHRC probe?

By Kantilal Parmar* I have approached the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) seeking an independent, impartial, and transparent investigation into a serious incident that took place at the Gujarat Secretariat in Gandhinagar on August 18, 2026. The matter concerns social activist and women’s rights leader Chandrikaben Solanki, who, according to the information available to me, was denied an entry pass to the Secretariat when she went there to meet Gujarat’s Social Justice and Empowerment Minister, Dr. Manishaben Vakil, to raise an issue concerning social justice.

Tibetan activist’s self-immolation sparks fresh concerns over cultural rights

By Kumar Krishnan* The question of Tibet has once again entered international discourse, raising difficult questions about human rights, religious freedom, cultural identity, language, and the relationship between political power and the rights of indigenous communities. On 20 August 2026, the Kashag and the Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile jointly organised a solidarity prayer service and peace march to mark the 49th day since the death of Lobga Rangzen, a Tibetan activist who died after self-immolating on 2 July in front of the United Nations Headquarters in New York.

IMF's policies 'stabilise' external creditors' balance sheets, 'generate' crisis in Africa

By Grieve Chelwa, Vijay Prashad Across Africa, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) presents itself as the custodian of macroeconomic stability. Its latest Article IV staff reports on Ethiopia . Malawi , Nigeria , South Africa , and Zambia are written for economies with very different histories and institutions. Yet they converge on a familiar prescription: fiscal consolidation, tighter monetary policy, market-determined exchange rates, subsidy reform, deregulation and ‘private-sector-led growth’. No serious economist can dismiss macroeconomic stability.

Counterview

Search This Blog