Skip to main content

Behind the numbers: What the Rajya Sabha results reveal about J&K politics

By Raqif Makhdoomi* 
After a gap of four years, Rajya Sabha elections were finally held in Jammu and Kashmir. These are indirect elections—meaning the people do not vote directly, but their elected representatives do. Similar to presidential elections, the process relies on votes cast by legislators.
This time, the elections took an unexpected turn when the Leader of Opposition alleged at a rally that some National Conference (NC) MLAs were preparing to switch sides to the BJP. The timing of the claim—just before the Rajya Sabha polls—sparked public curiosity. Would there be cross-voting, or was it just political posturing?
The ruling National Conference found itself in a difficult position. Its ally, the Congress, was upset that it was not given a “safe seat.” NC decided to contest three seats and offered one to Congress—the one they were least confident of winning. Congress viewed this as a betrayal. When asked about the party’s stance on supporting the NC candidate, the state Congress chief deferred the decision to the central leadership, hinting that all was not well within the alliance.
Sensing trouble, the National Conference changed tone—from confrontation to persuasion. It began appealing to the People’s Democratic Party (PDP), its uneasy ally Congress, and other like-minded legislators to help “keep the BJP away.” Ironically, the same PDP that NC leaders had accused of being close to the BJP now became a key player. PDP chief and former Chief Minister Mehbooba Mufti held a press conference declaring support for the NC candidate, though with a condition: her party would vote for NC as a third preference rather than a fourth. She explained that NC itself was unsure of securing the fourth seat, and PDP would not shoulder the risk if things went wrong. The PDP even issued a whip directing its MLAs to vote for the NC.
The Deputy Chief Minister confidently claimed that NC would win all four seats, while the BJP, contesting three, also expressed optimism. One seat was uncontested, meaning NC only had to manage three.
When results came, NC did win three—but the fourth seat shocked everyone. BJP, despite lacking the required numbers, secured 33 votes, while the NC candidate got only 21. The question now is: how did BJP manage seven extra votes?
It cannot be blamed on Sajad Lone’s group, which abstained from voting. Both Congress and PDP had issued whips to their MLAs to vote for NC, so defying those orders would have attracted legal consequences. Independents like Shabir Kullay, Sheikh Khurshid, and Mehraj Malik publicly stated they voted for NC. So who helped the BJP?
Was the Leader of Opposition right when he said that “all is not well” within the NC? Perhaps. When Farooq Abdullah was asked why he did not contest the Rajya Sabha polls, he said he needed to “look into matters at home,” hinting at internal discord. Given how his government was once toppled in the past, such a possibility cannot be dismissed today.
In the Assembly, there were heated exchanges between the Deputy Chief Minister and the opposition BJP over cross-voting. The Deputy CM’s cryptic remark—“Don’t force me to tell the truth. I know everything”—only deepened the mystery. If he truly knows the truth, why not share it with the public? Or is this all part of a larger drama to keep people guessing while the alliance quietly continues?
Some NC leaders have started blaming the PDP, but the public is unconvinced. The PDP’s whip was clear, and any defiance would have triggered legal scrutiny. Instead of pointing fingers, the NC should look inward. It is likely that a few of its own members voted for the BJP to secure personal advantages or safety. Even the Chief Minister acknowledged that some within the party voted against its interests. If that’s known, why not be transparent about it?
Jammu and Kashmir cannot afford another political episode like the one involving Ghulam Mohammad Shah. The region’s fragile stability cannot withstand fresh turmoil. The National Conference must abandon its “Maharaja” mindset and function like a truly democratic party—accountable to the people, not merely to its power brokers.
---
*Law student and human rights activist

Comments

TRENDING

From plagiarism to proxy exams: Galgotias and systemic failure in education

By Sandeep Pandey*   Shock is being expressed at Galgotias University being found presenting a Chinese-made robotic dog and a South Korean-made soccer-playing drone as its own creations at the recently held India AI Impact Summit 2026, a global event in New Delhi. Earlier, a UGC-listed journal had published a paper from the university titled “Corona Virus Killed by Sound Vibrations Produced by Thali or Ghanti: A Potential Hypothesis,” which became the subject of widespread ridicule. Following the robotic dog controversy coming to light, the university has withdrawn the paper. These incidents are symptoms of deeper problems afflicting the Indian education system in general. Galgotias merely bit off more than it could chew.

Covishield controversy: How India ignored a warning voice during the pandemic

Dr Amitav Banerjee, MD *  It is a matter of pride for us that a person of Indian origin, presently Director of National Institute of Health, USA, is poised to take over one of the most powerful roles in public health. Professor Jay Bhattacharya, an Indian origin physician and a health economist, from Stanford University, USA, will be assuming the appointment of acting head of the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), USA. Bhattacharya would be leading two apex institutions in the field of public health which not only shape American health policies but act as bellwether globally.

The 'glass cliff' at Galgotias: How a university’s AI crisis became a gendered blame game

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan*  “She was not aware of the technical origins of the product and in her enthusiasm of being on camera, gave factually incorrect information.” These were the words used in the official press release by Galgotias University following the controversy at the AI Impact Summit in Delhi. The statement came across as defensive, petty, and deeply insensitive.

Farewell to Saleem Samad: A life devoted to fearless journalism

By Nava Thakuria*  Heartbreaking news arrived from Dhaka as the vibrant city lost one of its most active and committed citizens with the passing of journalist, author and progressive Bangladeshi national Saleem Samad. A gentleman who always had issues to discuss with anyone, anywhere and at any time, he passed away on 22 February 2026 while undergoing cancer treatment at Dhaka Medical College Hospital. He was 74. 

Growth without justice: The politics of wealth and the economics of hunger

By Vikas Meshram*  In modern history, few periods have displayed such a grotesque and contradictory picture of wealth as the present. On one side, a handful of individuals accumulate in a single year more wealth than the annual income of entire nations. On the other, nearly every fourth person in the world goes to bed hungry or half-fed.

From ancient wisdom to modern nationhood: The Indian story

By Syed Osman Sher  South of the Himalayas lies a triangular stretch of land, spreading about 2,000 miles in each direction—a world of rare magic. It has fired the imagination of wanderers, settlers, raiders, traders, conquerors, and colonizers. They entered this country bringing with them new ethnicities, cultures, customs, religions, and languages.

Thali, COVID and academic credibility: All about the 2020 'pseudoscientific' Galgotias paper

By Jag Jivan*    The first page image of the paper "Corona Virus Killed by Sound Vibrations Produced by Thali or Ghanti: A Potential Hypothesis" published in the Journal of Molecular Pharmaceuticals and Regulatory Affairs , Vol. 2, Issue 2 (2020), has gone viral on social media in the wake of the controversy surrounding a Chinese robot presented by the Galgotias University as its original product at the just-concluded AI summit in Delhi . The resurfacing of the 2020 publication, authored by  Dharmendra Kumar , Galgotias University, has reignited debate over academic standards and scientific credibility.

Conversion laws and national identity: A Jesuit response response to the Hindutva narrative

By Rajiv Shah  A recent book, " Luminous Footprints: The Christian Impact on India ", authored by two Jesuit scholars, Dr. Lancy Lobo and Dr. Denzil Fernandes , seeks to counter the current dominant narrative on Indian Christians , which equates evangelisation with conversion, and education, health and the social services provided by Christians as meant to lure -- even force -- vulnerable sections into Christianity.

Unpaid overtime, broken promises: Indian Oil workers strike in Panipat

By Rosamma Thomas  Thousands of workers at the Indian Oil Corporation refinery in Panipat, Haryana, went on strike beginning February 23, 2026. They faced a police lathi charge, and the Central Industrial Security Force fired into the air to control the crowd.