Skip to main content

Beyond demographic strength: The case for population stabilization

By N.S. Venkataraman* 
India has recently overtaken China to become the most populous country in the world, with an estimated population between 1.45 and 1.5 billion. Projections suggest that this number could rise to around 1.8 billion by 2050, a level that raises serious concerns about sustainability and quality of life. Despite the magnitude of this demographic shift, public discourse in India has not reflected a sense of urgency. Some continue to describe this situation as a “demographic strength,” overlooking the potential socio-economic pressures that come with such rapid population growth.
A comparison with other large nations highlights the issue starkly. India’s land area is about 3.3 million square kilometers, supporting a population density of approximately 492 people per square kilometer. In contrast, the United States, with nearly three times the land area, has a population density of only 38 people per square kilometer, and China’s density stands at about 151. Russia, with an even larger territory, has just 8.5 people per square kilometer. Managing such a vast population within limited land resources presents India with a challenge unmatched in global history.
According to the 2023 Sample Registration Survey Statistical Report, India’s crude birth rate (CBR) declined from 19.1 to 18.4 per thousand, and the total fertility rate (TFR) dropped to 1.9. However, these figures vary widely across states—from a CBR of 25.8 in Bihar to 12 in Tamil Nadu. Bihar also records the highest TFR at 2.8. Although declining fertility is a positive trend, life expectancy continues to rise—up from 35 years in 1950 to 73 years in 2023—meaning the overall population will likely keep growing.
Some argue that falling fertility rates could result in an aging population and a shrinking workforce, pointing to examples from Japan, Russia, and China. However, given India’s already high population density, such concerns may be overstated. The country must balance population growth with its resource base, economic capacity, and employment opportunities.
Joblessness remains a pressing issue. With automation, robotics, and artificial intelligence transforming industries, the availability of jobs is shrinking, even as the number of job seekers continues to expand. Agriculture, which still employs a large section of the workforce, is also becoming increasingly mechanized. Persistent unemployment among the youth has led to growing social tensions, and governments have often resorted to subsidies and welfare schemes to manage discontent—an approach that is financially unsustainable in the long run.
India’s “overflowing” population has also driven many to seek employment abroad, sometimes resulting in political backlash against migrants in host countries. The growing criticism of “body shopping” by Indian firms abroad reflects broader global unease about such migration patterns.
At independence in 1947, India’s population stood at about 350 million. In 75 years, it has quadrupled. Yet, population control has largely receded from the national policy agenda. Some political and religious groups even encourage larger families, further complicating the demographic challenge.
To ensure long-term economic and social stability, India needs to adopt a clear, pragmatic population policy. A reasonable target would be to stabilize the population at around one billion in the coming decades. A balanced population size, aligned with the nation’s resources, could help India realize its economic potential, sustain social harmony, and move closer to becoming a global economic leader.
---

Comments

TRENDING

Sardar made up his mind on Pakistan in Dec 1946 "before" Mountbatten's Partition Plan

By Hari Desai* One has to be extra cautious while dealing with the history of towering personalities of the Indian freedom struggle, especially that of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel (October 31, 1875 - December 15, 1950). Present-day politicians prefer to "pronounce” on his life and quote him according to their convenience like a blind person describing an elephant.

Insider plot to kill Deendayal Upadhyay? What RSS pracharak Balraj Madhok said

By Shamsul Islam*  Balraj Madhok's died on May 2, 2016 ending an era of old guards of Hindutva politics. A senior RSS pracharak till his death was paid handsome tributes by the RSS leaders including PM Modi, himself a senior pracharak, for being a "stalwart leader of Jan Sangh. Balraj Madhok ji's ideological commitment was strong and clarity of thought immense. He was selflessly devoted to the nation and society. I had the good fortune of interacting with Balraj Madhok ji on many occasions". The RSS also issued a formal condolence message signed by the Supremo Mohan Bhagwat on behalf of all swayamsevaks, referring to his contribution of commitment to nation and society. He was a leading RSS pracharak on whom his organization relied for initiating prominent Hindutva projects. But today nobody in the RSS-BJP top hierarchy remembers/talks about Madhok as he was an insider chronicler of the immense degeneration which was spreading as an epidemic in the high echelons of th...

Rani Laxmi Bai, Tatya Tope 'martyred' by East India Company, Scindia's forefathers

Jiyaji Rao Scindia By  A  Representative In an email alert to Counterview, well-known political scientist Shamsul Islam has said that was “shameful for any political party in democratic India to keep children of Sindhias in their flock” given their role during the First War of Indian Independence (1857). In a direct commentary on Madhya Pradesh Congress leader Jyotiraditya Scindia moving over to BJP, Prof Islam has quote from a British gazetteer to prove his point.