Skip to main content

Advocacy group slams govt’s nuclear push, recalls Hiroshima-Nagasaki, Chernobyl, Fukushima disasters

By A Representative
 
Marking 80 years since the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the advocacy group Friends of the Earth India has issued a scathing public statement condemning the Indian government’s aggressive expansion of nuclear energy and proposed legal amendments that would allow private sector entry and dilute liability provisions. The group warned that such moves threaten to repeat “history’s gravest mistakes—not through war, but through irresponsible expansion of nuclear energy.”
The statement, dated August 9, titled “Remember Hiroshima–Nagasaki, Resist Nuclear Colonialism,” links the trauma of past nuclear disasters—from Hiroshima and Nagasaki to Chernobyl and Fukushima—with the risks posed by India’s current nuclear agenda. It criticizes the government’s plans to achieve 100 GW of nuclear power capacity by 2047 through Bharat small modular reactors, calling it a “false solution” that endangers lives, ecosystems, and future generations.
Friends of the Earth India expressed alarm over the Union Budget 2025–26 allocation of ₹24,661 crore to the Department of Atomic Energy, with ₹11,650 crore earmarked for new projects and SMRs. The group highlighted that proposed reactor sites in Jharkhand, Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, and Tamil Nadu are located in tribal and ecologically sensitive areas, often without public consultation or informed consent.
“The radioactive legacy of nuclear ambition is one the world still struggles to contain,” the statement reads, adding that nuclear energy’s ecological footprint is “severe,” with waste remaining hazardous for thousands of years and construction damaging forests, rivers, and coasts.
The group also criticized efforts to amend the Atomic Energy Act, 1962, and weaken the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act, 2010, arguing that these changes are designed to benefit corporate players, including foreign reactor suppliers who refuse to take responsibility for their technology. “Weakening liability provisions shields reactor suppliers from accountability, even if their technology is faulty or unsafe,” the statement asserts.
Calling nuclear energy “financially unviable,” Friends of the Earth India pointed to frequent delays, budget overruns, and high costs of waste management and decommissioning. “Yet the government continues to market nuclear energy as a ‘green,’ ‘safe,’ and ‘clean’ solution to the climate crisis—claims that collapse under scrutiny.”
The statement concludes with a call to action: “This is more than a policy dispute—it is a battle for our democracy, our communities, and our ecosystems. We must not let the memory of Hiroshima and Nagasaki fade, nor mortgage India’s future to radioactive danger.

Comments

TRENDING

Civil society at a crossroads: Service delivery vs. rights in the fight for social change

Counterview News   In the latest episode of the podcast Unmute , hosts Gagan Sethi and Minar Pimple convened a profound conversation with two veteran development practitioners to dissect a persistent tension within civil society: the perceived divide between service delivery and the struggle for rights. The episode, titled "Beyond Service Delivery: Civil Society, Rights, and the Politics of Social Change," featured Apoorva Oza , a development practitioner with decades of experience in rural development and institution-building, and Professor Dipa Sinha , a development economist known for her work on food, nutrition, gender, and social policy.

Grain vs. gasoline: How the global biofuel boom threatens India’s food and water security

By Rajiv Shah  A new report published by the international research and advocacy organization GRAIN has warned that the global resurgence of biofuels is triggering a dangerous dynamic of “more fuel, less food, more land grabs.” Driven by intersecting energy security concerns, geopolitical tensions, and aggressive decarbonization mandates, the expanding agrofuel industry is increasingly pitting corporate energy interests against global food security and indigenous land rights. 

Sikkim governor row: ALIFA asks centre to explain hurried appointment in Ankita Bhandari case

By A Representative   The All-India Feminist Alliance (ALIFA) on Saturday expressed “immense pain and outrage” that even after four years and a national uproar, justice has not been fully delivered in the Ankita Bhandari murder case and that a ruling party politician facing allegations has been “gifted a high-ranking constitutional office.” In a statement, ALIFA extended “unflinching solidarity” to Ankita’s parents, who it said are “fighting for justice on the streets of Delhi,” and demanded that pending the CBI inquiry and judicial decision, the appointment of BJP leader Dushyant Kumar Gautam as Sikkim’s Governor be subject to “immediate presidential review.”