Skip to main content

Karnataka 'warning bell': Hindutva defeated, not down, BJP may turn 'more reactionary'

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak* 

The defeat of BJP-led Hindutva politics in Karnataka is cause for celebration and hope for India's secular constitutional democracy. The people of Karnataka rejected divisive and bigoted politics under Narendra Modi's leadership. His campaign focused on polarization, while the Congress Party led a positive campaign. The Congress Party successfully consolidated its votes and organization, countering Hindutva propaganda with its five 'guarantees' policy promises.
These guarantees include providing 200 units of free electricity to every household through 'Gruha Jyothi’, grant of Rs 2,000 to every woman heading a family through 'Gruha Lakshmi’, 10 kg of rice per month to every member of BPL families through 'Anna Bhagya’, sanctioning of Rs 3,000 to unemployed graduates and diploma holders (18-25 age group) for two years through 'Yuva Nidhi’, and offering free travel for women through the 'Shakti' scheme. These alternative policies were crucial to the Congress Party's victory.
In spite of electoral defeat, the Hindutva politics continues to enjoy significant support base in Karnataka. The BJP has secured 36% of the total votes, which highlights the reactionary political, cultural and economic to the people of Karnataka and to their secular society. Hindutva is defeated but not down. The Hindutva forces led by BJP is going to be more reactionary to consolidate their higher caste Hindu vote bank after their electoral defeat.
Therefore, it is imperative to move beyond electoral populism to deracinate Hindutva to ensure prosperity, peace and social harmony among all communities in the state. The progressive and democratic governance along with educational and cultural interventions based on material history and science can shape popular culture to dismantle Hindutva project and its base.
The decline in vote share of Left parties in the Karnataka assembly election is a disturbing outcome. These parties lost elections in all their strongholds. Some lazy political analysis attributes this to weak trade union movements and identity politics.
The Left parties got engaged in internal conflicts and formed political alliances without a clear direction, prioritizing personal differences over ideological class positions. This decline in the Left's vote share is disastrous for the working people of the state and sends a negative signal to national politics.
The political disunity among Left parties is a clear example of missed opportunities in working-class politics and the promotion of radical political consciousness. Once again, the Left parties have failed to effectively address the challenges posed by the capitalist onslaught led by Hindutva fascism in India.
The Communist parties have failed to come to an understanding for a united Left front based on issues of people. It sends a wrong signal to the masses that Left parties lack basic understanding of their everyday issues and challenges in life.
The Communist Party of India (Marxist) had its tactical alliance with the Janata Dal (Secular) and the Republican Party of India (Prakash Ambedkar faction) (RPI-K). The JD(S) has provided outside support to the alliance candidates in three seats only when RPI-K contested for ten seats and the CPI(M) contested four seats. The Socialist Unity Centre of India (Communist) [SUCI(C)] has fought in fourteen constituencies in ten districts. The Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) and Liberation (CPI-ML) have contested in two seats.
The CPI and CPI(M) candidates have fought against each other in the KGF seat where as the CPI-ML and CPI(M) have fought against each other in KR Puram (Bengaluru Urban district). The CPI(M) and SUCI(C) have contested against each other in the Gulbarga rural seat. The Left parties have fought against each other and lost in several seats without forming any form of political understandings. 
Such a political trend in Left politics only empowers reactionary political forces in the long run. The disunity of Left weakens working people, citizenship rights, and their share in the democratic politics. The electoral defeats of the Left political parties weaken the welfare and democratic state.
Left politics is the moral compass and political anchor of the working people to uphold the economic interests of the masses for a progressive and democratic society. Left unity is central to the working-class political project in India. The political collaboration and cooperation among Left-wing political parties, groups and movements based on common objectives and shared values are crucial to achieve collective political progress and deepening of working-class politics.
Left parties were engaged in internal conflicts, formed alliances without clear direction, prioritized personal differences over ideological positions
There is no doubt that the Left encompasses a diverse range of ideologies and perspectives, the principle of Left unity must encourage setting aside differences and focusing on shared values and goals. The significance of Left unity in fostering social change, addressing common challenges, and promoting a more equitable and just society depends on the collective struggles of the Left parties. The mass movements can overcome the ideological fragmentations by acknowledging the inherent strengths in diversity.
The Left unity challenges existing power structures and promotes dialogue, understanding, and the exchange of ideas. It encourages activists, organizations, and political parties to unite their efforts, pooling their resources, skills, and networks to create a more powerful force for change.
By building bridges rather than walls, Left unity amplifies the collective voice of the Left, making it more effective in challenging existing power structures and advocating for progressive policies. The Left parties and their unity can only mobilise people against all forms of inequality and exploitation in the society by appealing to the wider society.
This wider collaboration enables the Left to create coalitions that span various social, economic, and cultural divides. The united Left can achieve greater influence and electoral success, translating its ideals into tangible policy changes for societal transformation. The Left parties need to amplify the voices and interests of the working people by transcending ideological differences and focusing on shared goals, Left unity can pave the way for significant social, economic, and environmental transformations.
Ultimately, the future of Left-wing politics in India depends on the actions and strategies adopted by the parties involved, the ability to connect with the aspirations and concerns of the people, and the capacity to effectively navigate the changing political landscape. Left unity can provide foundations for progressive social, economic, cultural and environmental transformation by upholding interests of the working people.
Left politics can only shape the future of a formidable mass movement capable of challenging all exploitative structures to create peaceful and egalitarian society. The forward march of the Left unity is not only the starting point but also the only available alternative to defeat the twin dangers of Hindutva fascism and capitalism in India.
---
*University of Glasgow, UK

Comments

TRENDING

From algorithms to exploitation: New report exposes plight of India's gig workers

By Jag Jivan   The recent report, "State of Finance in India Report 2024-25," released by a coalition including the Centre for Financial Accountability, Focus on the Global South, and other organizations, paints a stark picture of India's burgeoning digital economy, particularly highlighting the exploitation faced by gig workers on platform-based services. 

'Condonation of war crimes against women and children’: IPSN on Trump’s Gaza Board

By A Representative   The India-Palestine Solidarity Network (IPSN) has strongly condemned the announcement of a proposed “Board of Peace” for Gaza and Palestine by former US President Donald J. Trump, calling it an initiative that “condones war crimes against children and women” and “rubs salt in Palestinian wounds.”

Gig workers hold online strike on republic day; nationwide protests planned on February 3

By A Representative   Gig and platform service workers across the country observed a nationwide online strike on Republic Day, responding to a call given by the Gig & Platform Service Workers Union (GIPSWU) to protest what it described as exploitation, insecurity and denial of basic worker rights in the platform economy. The union said women gig workers led the January 26 action by switching off their work apps as a mark of protest.

India’s road to sustainability: Why alternative fuels matter beyond electric vehicles

By Suyash Gupta*  India’s worsening air quality makes the shift towards clean mobility urgent. However, while electric vehicles (EVs) are central to India’s strategy, they alone cannot address the country’s diverse pollution and energy challenges.

Jayanthi Natarajan "never stood by tribals' rights" in MNC Vedanta's move to mine Niyamigiri Hills in Odisha

By A Representative The Odisha Chapter of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity (CSD), which played a vital role in the struggle for the enactment of historic Forest Rights Act, 2006 has blamed former Union environment minister Jaynaynthi Natarjan for failing to play any vital role to defend the tribals' rights in the forest areas during her tenure under the former UPA government. Countering her recent statement that she rejected environmental clearance to Vendanta, the top UK-based NMC, despite tremendous pressure from her colleagues in Cabinet and huge criticism from industry, and the claim that her decision was “upheld by the Supreme Court”, the CSD said this is simply not true, and actually she "disrespected" FRA.

Stands 'exposed': Cavalier attitude towards rushed construction of Char Dham project

By Bharat Dogra*  The nation heaved a big sigh of relief when the 41 workers trapped in the under-construction Silkyara-Barkot tunnel (Uttarkashi district of Uttarakhand) were finally rescued on November 28 after a 17-day rescue effort. All those involved in the rescue effort deserve a big thanks of the entire country. The government deserves appreciation for providing all-round support.

Whither space for the marginalised in Kerala's privately-driven townships after landslides?

By Ipshita Basu, Sudheesh R.C.  In the early hours of July 30 2024, a landslide in the Wayanad district of Kerala state, India, killed 400 people. The Punjirimattom, Mundakkai, Vellarimala and Chooralmala villages in the Western Ghats mountain range turned into a dystopian rubble of uprooted trees and debris.

Over 40% of gig workers earn below ₹15,000 a month: Economic Survey

By A Representative   The Finance Minister, Nirmala Sitharaman, while reviewing the Economic Survey in Parliament on Tuesday, highlighted the rapid growth of gig and platform workers in India. According to the Survey, the number of gig workers has increased from 7.7 million to around 12 million, marking a growth of about 55 percent. Their share in the overall workforce is projected to rise from 2 percent to 6.7 percent, with gig workers expected to contribute approximately ₹2.35 lakh crore to the GDP by 2030. The Survey also noted that over 40 percent of gig workers earn less than ₹15,000 per month.

Fragmented opposition and identity politics shaping Tamil Nadu’s 2026 election battle

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  Tamil Nadu is set to go to the polls in April 2026, and the political battle lines are beginning to take shape. Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to the state on January 23, 2026, marked the formal launch of the Bharatiya Janata Party’s campaign against the ruling Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK). Addressing multiple public meetings, the Prime Minister accused the DMK government of corruption, criminality, and dynastic politics, and called for Tamil Nadu to be “freed from DMK’s chains.” PM Modi alleged that the DMK had turned Tamil Nadu into a drug-ridden state and betrayed public trust by governing through what he described as “Corruption, Mafia and Crime,” derisively terming it “CMC rule.” He claimed that despite making numerous promises, the DMK had failed to deliver meaningful development. He also targeted what he described as the party’s dynastic character, arguing that the government functioned primarily for the benefit of a single family a...