Why those holding exalted national positions seek to sully public discourse to abysmally low levels?

By RK Misra*

India’s ruling party has perfected a formula to win elections and master the mandate.
Every politically important poll you have variations of this theme dished out in myriad forms and features. The formula is simple. Use symbolisms. Flail at Pakistan, muddy the minority and harvest the Hindu. Cite Muslim mobilization to seek Hindu voter consolidation. Many times it works as in Gujarat, Uttar Pradesh and the north-eastern states and sometimes it does not as in Bihar. The by-election results declared May 3I are further cause for saffron concern. The cleaver failed to cut in Kairana, UP Lok Sabha seat as the Jats, Muslims and Dalits forged a front to frustrate the BJP.

The controversy stirred up around the portrait of Mohammed Ali Jinnah at the Aligarh Muslim University falls in this category. It was part of the saffron poll programme, aimed at the Hindu voter in Karnataka.

BJP MP from Aligarh Satish Gautam who raised the issue in a letter to the AMU vice-chairman on May 1 this year was among the members of the university court who had been informed of the existence of the portrait almost a year ago. The MP did not raise the matter at the appropriate academic body all this time. Why now.
The implication is obvious. Soon after, activists from the Hindu Yuva Vahini, founded by present UP Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath, who had been campaigning in Karnataka, were upon the scene clashing with the students, stoking the fires; grist for the media mill, job done for the saffronistas. Rake an issue in a distant north Indian town and turn it into nation-wide news to cleave communities for majority community votes in election-bound Karnataka.
Interestingly such a political poll experiment was first conducted by Narendra Modi who took charge as chief minister of Gujarat in October 2001.
The statewide ‘gaurav-yatra’ by the chief minister in the aftermath of the 2002 communal riots that followed the Godhra train carnage was the first of such cleaving exercises.
Come elections and the formula surfaces with religious regularity. Prime Minister Modi and his party chief Amit Shah have no qualms about leading from the front. In the Bihar elections three years ago, Modi gave a communal swing at a Buxar rally, charging chief minister Nitish Kumar and RJD leader Lalu Yadav with conspiring to take away five per cent reservation from OBCs, EBCs and dalits and give it away to Muslims.

In UP early last year it was the ‘kabristan-shamshan’ controversy and in Gujarat later the same year he went to the extent of accusing the former Prime Minister Man Mohan Singh of hobnobbing with Pakistan to ensure ‘his’ defeat. Brazenly, in your face and without batting an eyelid.
In Karnataka this last election, the Prime Minister again stated ‘untruths’. He is on record saying in an election rally at Kalburgi that after defeating Pakistan in nineteen forty eight,General Thimayya was insulted by Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru and defence minister Krishna Menon. Mr Prime Minister Sir, Thimayya became the army chief of India nine years after that event.
There were numerous other lies that the Prime Minister peddled during this last elections. These included that Congress leaders had no time to visit revolutionaries like Bhagat Singh and Batukeshwar Dutt who were in jail but they have time to meet leaders jailed on corruption charges, alluding to the visit of Rahul Gandhi with Lalu Yadav at AIMS. Mr Modi could do with reading Jawaharlal Nehru’s autobiography and the reference thereon to his visit to Lahore jail to meet them.
In Gujarat critics gleefully remember the public function at Siddhpur in 2005 when chief minister Modi had ‘magically’ revived the Saraswati river in a highly publicized state event through the convenient ruse of diverting Narmada waters. Thirteen years later, the mystical river is nowhere in sight though the chief minister who propagated a myth- and saw thousands carrying bottles of muddied water as precious ‘prasad’ -has now been the Prime Minister for over four years.
This brings us to the all important question whether those holding exalted national positions should be sullying public discourse to such abysmally low levels that things can never be the same again. The Prime Minister sets standards for others to emulate. The depths that he plumbs today will set the benchmark for those who succeed him. Modi has ensured that public discourse in India is plunged into a jousting journey to the centre of the earth.
If a Prime Minister with just four years in the saddle seeks to lampoon the country’s first executive head who ruled for almost 17 years at a stretch, he can rest assured that those who succeed him will put him through the shredder as well. After all, the Congress ruled India for three straight decades with king-sized repeat mandates from countrymen while the BJP which is into a scattered second term should remember that it came to power the first time only because the nation wanted the gentleman-politician Atal Bihari Vajpayee rewarded.
With just one more year for elections, enhanced exactitude and oratorial civility now may save future soiling.
Remember, overflowing trash cans only head to garbage dumps.
---
*Senior Gujarat-based journalist. This article first appeared in https://wordsmithsandnewsplumbers.blogspot.com/

Comments

Gram sabha as reformer: Mandla’s quiet challenge to the liquor economy

By Raj Kumar Sinha* This year, the Union Ministry of Panchayati Raj is organising a two-day PESA Mahotsav in Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, on 23–24 December 2025. The event marks the passage of the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 (PESA), enacted by Parliament on 24 December 1996 to establish self-governance in Fifth Schedule areas. Scheduled Areas are those notified by the President of India under Article 244(1) read with the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution, which provides for a distinct framework of governance recognising the autonomy of tribal regions. At present, Fifth Schedule areas exist in ten states: Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Odisha, Rajasthan and Telangana. The PESA Act, 1996 empowers Gram Sabhas—the village assemblies—as the foundation of self-rule in these areas. Among the many powers devolved to them is the authority to take decisions on local matters, including the regulation...

MG-NREGA: A global model still waiting to be fully implemented

By Bharat Dogra When the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MG-NREGA) was introduced in India nearly two decades ago, it drew worldwide attention. The reason was evident. At a time when states across much of the world were retreating from responsibility for livelihoods and welfare, the world’s second most populous country—with nearly two-thirds of its people living in rural or semi-rural areas—committed itself to guaranteeing 100 days of employment a year to its rural population.

Policy changes in rural employment scheme and the politics of nomenclature

By N.S. Venkataraman* The Government of India has introduced a revised rural employment programme by fine-tuning the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), which has been in operation for nearly two decades. The MGNREGA scheme guarantees 100 days of employment annually to rural households and has primarily benefited populations in rural areas. The revised programme has been named VB-G RAM–G (Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission – Gramin). The government has stated that the revised scheme incorporates several structural changes, including an increase in guaranteed employment from 100 to 125 days, modifications in the financing pattern, provisions to strengthen unemployment allowances, and penalties for delays in wage payments. Given the extent of these changes, the government has argued that a new name is required to distinguish the revised programme from the existing MGNREGA framework. As has been witnessed in recent years, the introdu...

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor* This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Concerns raised over move to rename MGNREGA, critics call it politically motivated

By A Representative Concerns have been raised over the Union government’s reported move to rename the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), with critics describing it as a politically motivated step rather than an administrative reform. They argue that the proposed change undermines the legacy of Mahatma Gandhi and seeks to appropriate credit for a programme whose relevance has been repeatedly demonstrated, particularly during times of crisis.

Rollback of right to work? VB–GRAM G Bill 'dilutes' statutory employment guarantee

By A Representative The Right to Food Campaign has strongly condemned the passage of the Viksit Bharat – Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) (VB–GRAM G) Bill, 2025, describing it as a major rollback of workers’ rights and a fundamental dilution of the statutory Right to Work guaranteed under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA). In a statement, the Campaign termed the repeal of MGNREGA a “dark day for workers’ rights” and accused the government of converting a legally enforceable, demand-based employment guarantee into a centralised, discretionary welfare scheme.

Making rigid distinctions between Indian and foreign 'historically untenable'

By A Representative Oral historian, filmmaker and cultural conservationist Sohail Hashmi has said that everyday practices related to attire, food and architecture in India reflect long histories of interaction and adaptation rather than rigid or exclusionary ideas of identity. He was speaking at a webinar organised by the Indian History Forum (IHF).

India’s Halal economy 'faces an uncertain future' under the new food Bill

By Syed Ali Mujtaba* The proposed Food Safety and Standards (Amendment) Bill, 2025 marks a decisive shift in India’s food regulation landscape by seeking to place Halal certification exclusively under government control while criminalising all private Halal certification bodies. Although the Bill claims to promote “transparency” and “standardisation,” its structure and implications raise serious concerns about religious freedom, economic marginalisation, and the systematic dismantling of a long-established, Muslim-led Halal ecosystem in India.

Search This Blog