Skip to main content

We vs them? Modi would use violence in Kashmir, resentment against army as "tool" to whip up passions

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*
The BJP has pulled out of the Jammu & Kashmir (J&K) government headed by People's Democratic Party (PDP) leader Mehbooba Mufti. Speaking to the media in Delhi, the party in charge of J&K Ram Madhav said that this alliance had become untenable as the situation in the valley was worsening every day.
According to Madhav, that ceasefire was a goodwill gesture which was not reciprocated, so they pulled the rug, and now the state would be under the direct control of the Center through the governor of the state.
It is clear that the BJP does not want to own the horrendous failure in J&K, and perhaps withdrew keeping in mind the 'national' sentiments, which would be much regressive than ever, as we know the 'chavanni chhap' leaders will spit fire in the public and convert the entire issue into Hindus and Muslims or India and Pakistan, as if Hindus have given them sole permit to speak on their behalf.
BJP leaders have used Kashmir's Pandit issue to polarise the masses and it was difficult for them to use the same rhetoric if they were in the power with PDP. Fact is that Kashmir is not merely a law and order issue, which this government wanted to convey to all. It is an international issue, despite all the denials by the Government of India and its thoroughly discredited mediamen. A few of those who questioned the state and militants actually became victims of violence.
Now, when the needs the attention of all of us to resolve, the Hindutva lumpens actually made it a Hindu-Muslim issue, raising the bogey of the treatment to Kashmiri Pandits. If the discrimination and violence in Kashmir has to be recounted and revisited, then where would you begin your story? Obviously not from 1990 when the situation became alarmingly out of control. Fact is that today the situation is worse than 1990. At least that time, the national media reported events, but today the Brahmanical media hide facts and speak like Amit Shah's spokespersons.
The situation in Kashmir is deeply disturbing and perhaps needed a balm, but this government was determined to use the Kashmiri dissent into a false nationalistic narratives to win the elections. Armed forces have been pushed into an entirely hostile atmosphere where they are made to believe, as if the local population has become Pakistani.
Without understanding the history of Kashmir, you cannot really resolve the crisis, but unfortunately, Assam, Kashmir, Nagaland are the regions which the ruling party wants to use for the rest of the country. For a common Sanghi or even non-Sanghi Indian, Kashmiris are anti-Indians, and therefore the army needs to crush them. It is because most of these lynch mob kind of nationalists have not ever felt the understanding of a minority psyche.
The whole understanding of the Kashmir, Assam, Nagaland from the glasses of upper caste north Indian mindset is only proving to be disastrous. Modi's advisers don't look beyond the immediate gains in elections, and hence the violence in Kashmir, or the resentment against the Indian army, would be used as a tool to whip up passions of we versus them.
BJP's ministers are determined to convert every issue into a Hindu-Muslim crisis but we hope that people of India are realising this gameplan of the Sangh Parivar and its crony corporates. Have we not seen how BJP and its leaders justified the human shield used by Major Gogoi, and now the said Major is under the investigation for another violation.
The party shamelessly supported those who have been campaigning against the Bakarwal community girl brutally raped and murdered by the priest of a temple along with other accomplice. Rather than openly condemning the heinous crime against humanity, the party tried to play the communal game and blaming the seculars and liberals for accusing the 'Hindus'. Even the lawyers in the Kathua court tried to subvert the case, which was finally transferred outside the state.
The Central government has completely failed in Kashmir. The sentiment in the valley has turned against India, and the army is finding it tough to handle the situation. The tragedy is that the follies of the political leadership in Delhi is being shouldered by the armed forces, who are doing their work in deeply difficult circumstances. So many of our soldiers have been killed in this warfare, which the government is still not ready to accede that it is a political issue and needs a political solution.
Veteran editor Shujaat Bukhari's murder was the last nail in the coffin, and the Central government wanted to put the blame entirely on Mehbooba Mufti, whose father made the lifetime mistake by allying with a totally communal fringe, which has not bothered about Kashmiri people, but which only wanted to dominate the geographical area, and not the people.
That is what the Sangh Parivar think of every part of India. They only love the land, which eventually they are handing over to the corporates, even when people are being killed when they protest. In Kashmir if they protest for their autonomy, they are terrorists elsewhere they are Maoists and Naxalites. Interestingly those Sanghis who are openly threatening and killing people are nationalists and have full political support.
We know that after this breakup the government will use the same macho language and BJP political leaders will prepare the background of how the party did not 'succumb' to 'terrorists' and 'Muslims', who are anti-Indians. Well, we hope this falsification of history will be rejected by the people of India, but even if this is accepted, it is not going to resolve Kashmir. You cannot resolve the J&K issue or bring peace, thereby holding referendum in rest of the country or at the crony corporate-funded corrupt communal TV studios.
You cannot decide the future of Kashmir by making it an issue during the election to polarise votes in rest of the country. If you want to resolve the issue, just go there, speak to people, show your intents and remain honest. However, this is not visible and therefore situation is becoming grimmer.
As there is no government even for the name sake, the direct rule of Delhi will be observed carefully internationally. For the first time in the history, Kashmir issue has come at the UN and a report castigate India for the human rights violation. Now just outrightly rejecting it would not suffice. Show some work at the ground and speak to the people.
Once your desh bhakts have discredited all the political parties in the valley, all the people who were really interested to speak, things are difficult. I have said many times that those Kashmiris who are speaking of sanity and peace face threats both from the Indian state as well as the militants outfits. Their lives are in danger and the state has unable to protect them.
It is time for the government to seriously engage all the stakeholders, including political parties, civil society organisations and others. Also, at the national level, not merely the government, but all opposition parties, too, must be taken into confidence to build a consensus on J&K. A military solution to the issue will never be possible and ultimately we will have to bring all the forces to the negotiation table. Using Kashmir for the electoral purpose will boomerang and further isolate India at the International forums.
---
*Human rights defender. Source: Author's Facebook timeline

Comments

TRENDING

Gram sabha as reformer: Mandla’s quiet challenge to the liquor economy

By Raj Kumar Sinha*  This year, the Union Ministry of Panchayati Raj is organising a two-day PESA Mahotsav in Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, on 23–24 December 2025. The event marks the passage of the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 (PESA), enacted by Parliament on 24 December 1996 to establish self-governance in Fifth Schedule areas. Scheduled Areas are those notified by the President of India under Article 244(1) read with the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution, which provides for a distinct framework of governance recognising the autonomy of tribal regions. At present, Fifth Schedule areas exist in ten states: Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Odisha, Rajasthan and Telangana. The PESA Act, 1996 empowers Gram Sabhas—the village assemblies—as the foundation of self-rule in these areas. Among the many powers devolved to them is the authority to take decisions on local matters, including the regulation...

MG-NREGA: A global model still waiting to be fully implemented

By Bharat Dogra  When the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MG-NREGA) was introduced in India nearly two decades ago, it drew worldwide attention. The reason was evident. At a time when states across much of the world were retreating from responsibility for livelihoods and welfare, the world’s second most populous country—with nearly two-thirds of its people living in rural or semi-rural areas—committed itself to guaranteeing 100 days of employment a year to its rural population.

Policy changes in rural employment scheme and the politics of nomenclature

By N.S. Venkataraman*  The Government of India has introduced a revised rural employment programme by fine-tuning the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), which has been in operation for nearly two decades. The MGNREGA scheme guarantees 100 days of employment annually to rural households and has primarily benefited populations in rural areas. The revised programme has been named VB-G RAM–G (Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission – Gramin). The government has stated that the revised scheme incorporates several structural changes, including an increase in guaranteed employment from 100 to 125 days, modifications in the financing pattern, provisions to strengthen unemployment allowances, and penalties for delays in wage payments. Given the extent of these changes, the government has argued that a new name is required to distinguish the revised programme from the existing MGNREGA framework. As has been witnessed in recent years, the introdu...

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Concerns raised over move to rename MGNREGA, critics call it politically motivated

By A Representative   Concerns have been raised over the Union government’s reported move to rename the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), with critics describing it as a politically motivated step rather than an administrative reform. They argue that the proposed change undermines the legacy of Mahatma Gandhi and seeks to appropriate credit for a programme whose relevance has been repeatedly demonstrated, particularly during times of crisis.

Rollback of right to work? VB–GRAM G Bill 'dilutes' statutory employment guarantee

By A Representative   The Right to Food Campaign has strongly condemned the passage of the Viksit Bharat – Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) (VB–GRAM G) Bill, 2025, describing it as a major rollback of workers’ rights and a fundamental dilution of the statutory Right to Work guaranteed under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA). In a statement, the Campaign termed the repeal of MGNREGA a “dark day for workers’ rights” and accused the government of converting a legally enforceable, demand-based employment guarantee into a centralised, discretionary welfare scheme.

Making rigid distinctions between Indian and foreign 'historically untenable'

By A Representative   Oral historian, filmmaker and cultural conservationist Sohail Hashmi has said that everyday practices related to attire, food and architecture in India reflect long histories of interaction and adaptation rather than rigid or exclusionary ideas of identity. He was speaking at a webinar organised by the Indian History Forum (IHF).

India’s Halal economy 'faces an uncertain future' under the new food Bill

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  The proposed Food Safety and Standards (Amendment) Bill, 2025 marks a decisive shift in India’s food regulation landscape by seeking to place Halal certification exclusively under government control while criminalising all private Halal certification bodies. Although the Bill claims to promote “transparency” and “standardisation,” its structure and implications raise serious concerns about religious freedom, economic marginalisation, and the systematic dismantling of a long-established, Muslim-led Halal ecosystem in India.