Skip to main content

China-led, India-supported AIIB funding hyper-inflated infra projects, promoting crony capitalism: Mumbai meet

Medha Patkar addressing the convention
By A Representative
A civil society-sponsored convention, concluded ahead of the high-profile AIIB (Asian Infrastructure and Investment Bank) board meet, to take place on June 25-26 in Mumbai, has sharply criticized the "China-led" international financial institution (IFI), insisting, it "rejects" AIIB claim that it "serves as a healthy and essential alternative to undemocratic IFIs such as the World Bank, Asian Development Bank and International Finance Corporation which are controlled by western powers."
Held in Mumbai on June 21-23, a resolution adopted at the end of the convention said, "The design and structure of the $100 billion AIIB functions equally undemocratically. What is worse, it invests in projects without in any manner complying with necessary environmental and social safeguards. In the process, AIIB is doling out billions of dollars of loans to critical sectors such as energy, road building and urbanization causing extensive negative environmental and social impacts."
The resolution noted. "As a result, India, the largest recipient of AIIB loans, has become a site for corporate land grab resulting in massive loss of livelihoods and displacement of rural and urban communities, the prime example being that of the Amravati capital city which is being developed on flood plains and 50,000 acres of fertile agricultural land forcibly acquired from farmers and workers."
Participated by over 1,000 delegates from 200 organizations, the convention was attended by senior activists, academics and financial analysists including Medha Patkar, economist Prof Arun Kumar, Praful Samantara, financial analyst Sucheta Dalal, activists Ulka Mahajan, Roma, Shaktiman Ghosh, Leo Colaco, T Peter, Dr Sunilam, Ram Wangkheirakpam, Leo Saldanha, Rajendra Ravi, Gabriele Dietrich, among others.
Prof Arun Kumar
Taking directly on Prime Minister Narendra Modi for "the IFI promoted development model without any public debate", and terming it "Modani model", the resolution said, it is "pushing big and unnecessary hyper-inflated infrastructure projects like industrial corridors, Bharatmala, Sagarmala, bullet trains, smart cities and others" -- all this "at the cost of basic necessities" of the people such as food, housing and clothing.
"This model is designed to strengthen the hegemony of capital, maximisation of profit and promotion of crony capitalism. The model is best described as: free hand to corporations and loot of labour, farmers, workers and adivasis. We reject this model and the governments and political parties who promote it. They have lost the moral and political legitimacy to rule", the resolution said.
It said, "The Government of India is hosting the AIIB AGM at a time when the Indian economy is reeling under multiple crises which are largely an outcome of a series of reckless and draconian actions of the administration led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The colossal disaster of demonetisation (November 2016), which was followed by an ill-planned unveiling of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime (2017), has resulted in a terrible attack on the fragile economic status of the poor, devastating millions of livelihoods in farming, fisher and pastoral communities as well as seriously damaging the entrepreneurship of small and medium enterprises and the unorganised sector."
It added, "These policies build on the failed neoliberal reforms and the agenda of liberalisation, privatisation and globalisation which began in 1991 at the behest of the IMF. The working systems of the Reserve Bank of India and other financial regulatory institutions, as well as public sector banks, have been undermined by the constant interference from the Finance Ministry of India, endangering the resilience of the country's financial architecture which has withstood multiple economic and financial crises over time."
"As a result, billions of dollars of bad debt remains unrecovered. Their volume is mounting. Some of India’s richest men, and the massive and powerful corporations they lead, are major debtors to India’s banks. Because of their deep access to high political power, their bad loans and Non-Performing Assets are being systematically written off without attaching their personal assets or taking legal action to tackle such serious economic violations", it said.
Demanding that the "loans, debts and tax benefits given to corporations, amounting to Rs 48 lakh crore approximately, be recovered, and be used to provide education, health and employment for all and to eliminate hunger and poverty", the resolution said, "This should also be used for waiving the farm loans of millions of marginal farmers, workers, adivasis and small enterprises, and to help them rebuild the economy."

Comments

Uma said…
Say what you like, nobody is listening. This is the only way to get the photographs and name in th e media world-wide

TRENDING

Gram sabha as reformer: Mandla’s quiet challenge to the liquor economy

By Raj Kumar Sinha*  This year, the Union Ministry of Panchayati Raj is organising a two-day PESA Mahotsav in Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, on 23–24 December 2025. The event marks the passage of the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 (PESA), enacted by Parliament on 24 December 1996 to establish self-governance in Fifth Schedule areas. Scheduled Areas are those notified by the President of India under Article 244(1) read with the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution, which provides for a distinct framework of governance recognising the autonomy of tribal regions. At present, Fifth Schedule areas exist in ten states: Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Odisha, Rajasthan and Telangana. The PESA Act, 1996 empowers Gram Sabhas—the village assemblies—as the foundation of self-rule in these areas. Among the many powers devolved to them is the authority to take decisions on local matters, including the regulation...

MG-NREGA: A global model still waiting to be fully implemented

By Bharat Dogra  When the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MG-NREGA) was introduced in India nearly two decades ago, it drew worldwide attention. The reason was evident. At a time when states across much of the world were retreating from responsibility for livelihoods and welfare, the world’s second most populous country—with nearly two-thirds of its people living in rural or semi-rural areas—committed itself to guaranteeing 100 days of employment a year to its rural population.

Policy changes in rural employment scheme and the politics of nomenclature

By N.S. Venkataraman*  The Government of India has introduced a revised rural employment programme by fine-tuning the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), which has been in operation for nearly two decades. The MGNREGA scheme guarantees 100 days of employment annually to rural households and has primarily benefited populations in rural areas. The revised programme has been named VB-G RAM–G (Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission – Gramin). The government has stated that the revised scheme incorporates several structural changes, including an increase in guaranteed employment from 100 to 125 days, modifications in the financing pattern, provisions to strengthen unemployment allowances, and penalties for delays in wage payments. Given the extent of these changes, the government has argued that a new name is required to distinguish the revised programme from the existing MGNREGA framework. As has been witnessed in recent years, the introdu...

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Concerns raised over move to rename MGNREGA, critics call it politically motivated

By A Representative   Concerns have been raised over the Union government’s reported move to rename the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), with critics describing it as a politically motivated step rather than an administrative reform. They argue that the proposed change undermines the legacy of Mahatma Gandhi and seeks to appropriate credit for a programme whose relevance has been repeatedly demonstrated, particularly during times of crisis.

Rollback of right to work? VB–GRAM G Bill 'dilutes' statutory employment guarantee

By A Representative   The Right to Food Campaign has strongly condemned the passage of the Viksit Bharat – Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) (VB–GRAM G) Bill, 2025, describing it as a major rollback of workers’ rights and a fundamental dilution of the statutory Right to Work guaranteed under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA). In a statement, the Campaign termed the repeal of MGNREGA a “dark day for workers’ rights” and accused the government of converting a legally enforceable, demand-based employment guarantee into a centralised, discretionary welfare scheme.

Making rigid distinctions between Indian and foreign 'historically untenable'

By A Representative   Oral historian, filmmaker and cultural conservationist Sohail Hashmi has said that everyday practices related to attire, food and architecture in India reflect long histories of interaction and adaptation rather than rigid or exclusionary ideas of identity. He was speaking at a webinar organised by the Indian History Forum (IHF).

India’s Halal economy 'faces an uncertain future' under the new food Bill

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  The proposed Food Safety and Standards (Amendment) Bill, 2025 marks a decisive shift in India’s food regulation landscape by seeking to place Halal certification exclusively under government control while criminalising all private Halal certification bodies. Although the Bill claims to promote “transparency” and “standardisation,” its structure and implications raise serious concerns about religious freedom, economic marginalisation, and the systematic dismantling of a long-established, Muslim-led Halal ecosystem in India.