Skip to main content

There is nothing sacrosanct about Pranab, but he being brahmin was important for RSS... as also for others

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*
Pranab Mukherjee has paid 'gIorious' tribute to RSS founder Hedgewar as a great son of India. At the same point of time he also spoke of 'constitutional patriotism'. Yes, people like us have been speaking about constitutional morality but Pranab Da also knows that such things will fail when constitution does not become part of our life, not to be used suitably by everyone according to their convenience.
There are many who felt that Pranab Mukherjee did well and spoke at the Sangh Parivar platform and put his 'strong' viewpoint and there are millions others who felt 'betrayed'. Many said, would Pranab go to attend any political meeting organised by other political outfits of either Muslims or Christian organisations? There is no doubt that RSS's inviting guest is nothing but to project its image as 'Iiberal’ organisation.
Second, it is also clever in knowing people's profile. We all know Pranab Mukherjee a die hard brahmin whose Janeu is visible during the nine days fasting at his home town every year. Such learned persons, full of 'knowledge', still follow those casteist traditions reflects the whole mindset. He gave an idea that constitutional patriotism alone can unite us but he would never dare to say that it is the brahmanical forces who are hell bent to destroy this country. After all what does RSS mean about Indian culture? It means a culture of brahmanical hegemony, that too of pure Nagpuri brahmins.
I did not have any expectations from Pranab. I always felt he was a typical babu who is 'expert' in nitty gritties and Indira Gandhi used his quality. There are hundreds of babus in the secretariat and offices who know more than their bosses, but for being a leader you need more than mere technical knowledge. You need courage to say things and you must have convictions.
Can any one say Pranab has convictions? Can Pranab ever come close to say Arjun Singh, a man much discarded by Delhi elite but was brilliant and never compromised on his secular values? When did Pranab speak about social justice in his entire career even as he hailed from Bengal, which has a huge Dalit and Muslim population? Where were his principles when he met Bal Thackrey for his own campaign?
Pranab knows well that the same RSS and its internet goons have been carrying on campaign against Sonia Gandhi and the Nehru family. Sonia was targeted for her foreign origin. Rather than appreciating the woman who made India her home, it continued to vilify her. Question is, how long will we justify our softness towards such an organisation whose ideas are absolutely farcical and supremacists? Though they abuse Nehru they will find a photograph here or there suggesting that he attended their meeting. If Nehru had a soft corner then why they didn't invite him?
Krishna Gopal has written about Babasaheb Ambedkar's relationship with RSS leaders. We know for fact, that at the highest level, leaders do not get personal and will not insult individually, but to suggest that all those who met them in person support their viewpoint is mischievous and scandalous. None of these leaders ever attended their platform and spoke in admiration for their 'politics'. Even if someone has spoken several decade back, when the organisation was an isolated urbanised one, it is a much different thing than today when the organisation wields enormous power and guide the ruling party.
It is important to understand whether RSS really believes in dialogue or not. What are the dialogues it wants? It has used the bogey of culture to make you surrender and plant stories against you in the media. Will the Sangh Parivar uphold what Mukherjee said, 'value of constitution' and rule of law? Should we accept whatever the constitution says or should we say that the constitution must adhere to all the highest standards of human dignity and human rights, right to choice as defined in international laws, and various human rights covenants?
We admit that at the moment defending the constitution is the best thing, but it is equally important that RSS is influencing the government to change various things. We need to oppose them. When we say respect the constitution, it means respect the constitution in original, and not as per the amended version on the advise of Sangh Parivar. Can we accept the rules framed to humiliate the minorities?
Pranab Mukherjee is a drawing room politician. He could win his first Lok Sabha poll in 2004, thinking he could have become prime minister. Well, as an individual he has every right to become the prime minister, but that depends on the party in power.
There is nothing sacrosanct about Pranab, but some factors that his being brahmin was important for RSS and others. The other factor was his close association with Reliance. That is the reason that for long there was a whisper that Reliance was forcing Modi to work for a second term for Mukherjee.
Pranab Mukherjee is a senior citizen now and may be seen as a consensus candidate in case there is crisis. We hope this situation will not arise in India, as there are enough leaders. India needs political leaders with clear vision and unambiguous characteristics, and not those who can define things according to their convenience.
In his life Pranab da rarely spoke of Ambedkar. I would suggest him to visit Nagpur during the Dhamma Chakra Pravartan Diwas and see a million people turning up to pay their tribute to Babasaheb Ambedkar and celebrate the Dhamma. We would like him to speak there and address the nation.
The Bania channels, who have been dutifully broadcasting the absurd drill of the so-called Swayamsevaks, have never ever done a live show of the Deekshabhumi event. Nagpur is the birth place of RSS, but in the city the Sangh is totally outclassed by Ambedkarites. Mukherjee is called a knowledgeable person but I dont know how much he knows that there is a huge congregation every year at Deekshabhumi, where people flock on their own.
Will Mukherjee ever show his willingness to visit Deekshabhumi and address the huge gathering of the people there? I am sure, he will get more enlightenment there than he got at the Sangh Parivar's headquarter. Was it not shameful that an organisation claiming to be more patriotic could not unfurl the national flag and sing national anthem? For last four years, the goons in the name of patriotism have been beating up people, giving licence of nationalism and patriotism to them but rarely do the same.
I agree with Shramistha Mukherjee, his daughter, who said that only visuals will remain and would be used in future by the fake news agencies of the Sangh Parivar. The speech would also be used that way. Pranab Da is a politicians and played his game but it will be a disaster if he considers himself an alternative of the current government, or is attempting to be a consensus candidate. We hope it will not happen.
Pranab should have been speaking as conscience keeper of our country, rather he has legitimised an organisation, which is responsible for all the chaos and anarchy that we have in the country today. It means nothing to say that he was a Congressman all his life. Janue i.e. sacred brahmanical thread, wins over ideology.
---
Source: The author's Facebook timeline

Comments

Radhika Ramaseshan said…
RSS has come a long long way from its brahmin fixation. Two of its sarsanghachalaks Deoras and Rajendra Singh were not brahmins. If it was brahmin centered it wouldn't have grown and expanded the way it has!
June 08, 2018
Post a Comment

TRENDING

Gram sabha as reformer: Mandla’s quiet challenge to the liquor economy

By Raj Kumar Sinha*  This year, the Union Ministry of Panchayati Raj is organising a two-day PESA Mahotsav in Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, on 23–24 December 2025. The event marks the passage of the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 (PESA), enacted by Parliament on 24 December 1996 to establish self-governance in Fifth Schedule areas. Scheduled Areas are those notified by the President of India under Article 244(1) read with the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution, which provides for a distinct framework of governance recognising the autonomy of tribal regions. At present, Fifth Schedule areas exist in ten states: Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Odisha, Rajasthan and Telangana. The PESA Act, 1996 empowers Gram Sabhas—the village assemblies—as the foundation of self-rule in these areas. Among the many powers devolved to them is the authority to take decisions on local matters, including the regulation...
Post a Comment
»

MG-NREGA: A global model still waiting to be fully implemented

By Bharat Dogra  When the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MG-NREGA) was introduced in India nearly two decades ago, it drew worldwide attention. The reason was evident. At a time when states across much of the world were retreating from responsibility for livelihoods and welfare, the world’s second most populous country—with nearly two-thirds of its people living in rural or semi-rural areas—committed itself to guaranteeing 100 days of employment a year to its rural population.
Post a Comment
»

Policy changes in rural employment scheme and the politics of nomenclature

By N.S. Venkataraman*  The Government of India has introduced a revised rural employment programme by fine-tuning the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), which has been in operation for nearly two decades. The MGNREGA scheme guarantees 100 days of employment annually to rural households and has primarily benefited populations in rural areas. The revised programme has been named VB-G RAM–G (Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission – Gramin). The government has stated that the revised scheme incorporates several structural changes, including an increase in guaranteed employment from 100 to 125 days, modifications in the financing pattern, provisions to strengthen unemployment allowances, and penalties for delays in wage payments. Given the extent of these changes, the government has argued that a new name is required to distinguish the revised programme from the existing MGNREGA framework. As has been witnessed in recent years, the introdu...
Post a Comment
»

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.
Post a Comment
»

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.
59 comments
»

Concerns raised over move to rename MGNREGA, critics call it politically motivated

By A Representative   Concerns have been raised over the Union government’s reported move to rename the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), with critics describing it as a politically motivated step rather than an administrative reform. They argue that the proposed change undermines the legacy of Mahatma Gandhi and seeks to appropriate credit for a programme whose relevance has been repeatedly demonstrated, particularly during times of crisis.
Post a Comment
»

Rollback of right to work? VB–GRAM G Bill 'dilutes' statutory employment guarantee

By A Representative   The Right to Food Campaign has strongly condemned the passage of the Viksit Bharat – Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) (VB–GRAM G) Bill, 2025, describing it as a major rollback of workers’ rights and a fundamental dilution of the statutory Right to Work guaranteed under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA). In a statement, the Campaign termed the repeal of MGNREGA a “dark day for workers’ rights” and accused the government of converting a legally enforceable, demand-based employment guarantee into a centralised, discretionary welfare scheme.
Post a Comment
»

Making rigid distinctions between Indian and foreign 'historically untenable'

By A Representative   Oral historian, filmmaker and cultural conservationist Sohail Hashmi has said that everyday practices related to attire, food and architecture in India reflect long histories of interaction and adaptation rather than rigid or exclusionary ideas of identity. He was speaking at a webinar organised by the Indian History Forum (IHF).
Post a Comment
»

India’s Halal economy 'faces an uncertain future' under the new food Bill

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  The proposed Food Safety and Standards (Amendment) Bill, 2025 marks a decisive shift in India’s food regulation landscape by seeking to place Halal certification exclusively under government control while criminalising all private Halal certification bodies. Although the Bill claims to promote “transparency” and “standardisation,” its structure and implications raise serious concerns about religious freedom, economic marginalisation, and the systematic dismantling of a long-established, Muslim-led Halal ecosystem in India.
Post a Comment
»