Parliament has "no powers" to abrogate Article 370, which provides special status to Jammu & Kashmir

Rajindar Sachar

By A Representative
Justice (retired) Rajindar Sachar, who headed high-powered committee, which came up with a much-debated report on the social, economic and educational status of Muslims in India in 2006, has declared that the BJP is living in great delusion that Article 370 of the Constitution of India, which provides autonomous status to Jammu & Kashmir (J&K) , can be abrogated. In a commentary circulated on the social media by well-known social activist Teesta Setelvad, fighting a legal battle against Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s involvement in the 2002 Gujarat riots, Sachar said, J&K became part of India on October 27, 1947 only because of the Instrument of Accession, dated October 27, 1947, signed by the Maharaja, allowing the J&K to acceded to the Dominion of India.
Sachar, who was Delhi High Court judge earlier, said, clause 3 of the the Instrument of Accession specifically provides that the terms of instrument shall not be varied by amending any law by Indian Parliament, unless such “amendment is accepted by the Maharaja”. Sachar added, “The instrument also clearly laid down that nothing in the instrument shall be deemed to commit the state in any way to the acceptance of any future Constitution of India.”
According to Sachar, the instrument accepted “only a limited number of matters, defence, external affairs, communications”, etc. on which the Indian legislature could make laws for J&K. Pointing out that “this special relationship of J&K found its reflection in Article 370 of the Indian Constitution”, Sachar said, Article 370 lays down that, “notwithstanding anything in the Constitution, the powers of Parliament to make laws for the state shall be limited to those matters in the Union list and the concurrent list.”
Even these laws would apply to J&K “in consultation with the government of the state”, and these should be in consonance with the Instrument of Accession, Sachar suggested, adding, “Thus by virtue of Article 370 Parliament can legislate for J&K on matters other than those mentioned in the Instrument of Accession, but only after obtaining the concurrence of the state of J&K.”
Sachar admitted that there is a provision in Article370, in section (3), which provides that the President may by notification declare that this article shall cease to be operative. However, he adds, “But the proviso clearly lays down a limitation that the recommendation of the constituent assembly of the state shall be necessary before the President issues such a notification.” He adds, this shows that “Article 370 cannot be withdrawn by Parliament purporting to exercise the power of amendment given by Article 368.”
Giving the example of Mizoram, which like J&K was given an autonomous status through Article 371G, introduced through Constitution’s 55th amendment Act, 1986, Sachar said, the constitutional amendment “provides that no Act of parliament in respect of ownership and transfer of land shall apply to the State of Mizoram unless the legislative assembly of Mizoram by a resolution so decides.”
Pointing out that this provision is “identical to Article 370 of the constitution regarding J&K, and the BJP was a party to the amendment”, Sachar wondered, “Why does BJP apply double standards in the case of Muslim majority State of J&K?”
“It needs to be appreciated that retention of Article 370 is a matter of self respect and honour and assertion of its distinct identity for people of J&K”, says Sachar, asking why can’t the BJP, even when most of parties in J&K are desirous of finding a lasting solution, have the courage to “give up its opposition to Article 370 – which no Kashmiri can possibly agree to abrogate because it is a matter of preserving his special identity.”
Sachar’s commentary comes in the wake of open debate triggered by Modi ahead of the recent Lok Sabha polls where he called for debate on article 370. Among others, BJP chief Rajnath Sigh called for debate on why Article 370 of the constitution cannot be abrogated. “One wishes he had sought this enlightenment before including the provocative item of abrogation of Article 370 in BJP election manifesto”, Sachar said.

Comments

Countrywide protest by gig workers puts spotlight on algorithmic exploitation

By A Representative A nationwide protest led largely by women gig and platform workers was held across several states on February 3, with the Gig & Platform Service Workers Union (GIPSWU) claiming the mobilisation as a success and a strong assertion of workers’ rights against what it described as widespread exploitation by digital platform companies. Demonstrations took place in Delhi, Rajasthan, Karnataka, Maharashtra and other states, covering major cities including New Delhi, Jaipur, Bengaluru and Mumbai, along with multiple districts across the country.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Budget 2026 focuses on pharma and medical tourism, overlooks public health needs: JSAI

By A Representative Jan Swasthya Abhiyan India (JSAI) has criticised the Union Budget 2026, stating that it overlooks core public health needs while prioritising the pharmaceutical industry, private healthcare, medical tourism, public-private partnerships, and exports related to AYUSH systems. In a press note issued from New Delhi, the public health network said that primary healthcare services and public health infrastructure continue to remain underfunded despite repeated policy assurances.

'Gandhi Talks': Cinema that dares to be quiet, where music, image and silence speak

By Vikas Meshram In today’s digital age, where reels and short videos dominate attention spans, watching a silent film for over two hours feels almost like an act of resistance. Directed by Kishor Pandurang Belekar, “Gandhi Talks” is a bold cinematic experiment that turns silence into language and wordlessness into a powerful storytelling device. The film is not mere entertainment; it is an experience that pushes the viewer inward, compelling reflection on life, values, and society.

When compassion turns lethal: Euthanasia and the fear of becoming a burden

By Deepika A 55-year-old acquaintance passed away recently after a long battle with cancer. Why so many people are dying relatively young is a question being raised in several forums, and that debate is best reserved for another day. This individual was kept on a ventilator for nearly five months, after which the doctors and the family finally decided to let go. The cost of keeping a person on life support for such extended periods is enormous. Yet families continue to spend vast sums even when the chances of survival are minimal. Life, we are told, is precious, and nature itself strives to protect and sustain it.

Report exposes human rights gaps in India's $36 billion garment export industry

By Jag Jivan A new report sheds light on the urgent human rights challenges within India’s vast textile and garment industry, as global regulations increasingly demand corporate accountability in supply chains. Titled “Beneath the Seams,” the study reveals that despite the sector employing over 45 million people, systemic issues of poverty wages, unfair purchasing practices, and the exclusion of workers from decision-making persist, leaving millions vulnerable.

Penpa Tsering’s leadership and record under scrutiny amidst Tibetan exile elections

By Tseten Lhundup* Within the Tibetan exile community, Penpa Tsering is often described as having risen through grassroots engagement. Born in 1967, he comes from an ordinary Tibetan family, pursued higher education at Delhi University in India, and went on to serve as Speaker of the Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile from 2008 to 2016. In 2021, he was elected Sikyong of the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA), becoming the second democratically elected political leader of the administration after Lobsang Sangay.

When resistance became administrative: How I learned to stop romanticising the labour movement

By Rohit Chauhan* On my first day at a labour rights NGO, I was given a monthly sales target: sixty memberships. Not sixty workers to organise, not sixty conversations about exploitation, not sixty political discussions. Sixty conversions. I remember staring at the whiteboard, wondering whether I had mistakenly walked into a multi-level marketing office instead of a trade union. The language was corporate, the urgency managerial, and the tone unmistakably transactional. It was my formal introduction to a strange truth I would slowly learn: in contemporary India, even rebellion runs on performance metrics.

Silencing the university: How fear is replacing debate in academic India

By Sunil Kyumar* “Republic Day is a powerful symbol of our freedom, Constitution, and democratic values. This festival gives us renewed energy and inspiration to move forward together with the resolve of nation-building”, said Prime Minister Narendra Modi on January 26, 2026. On this occasion, the Prime Minister also shared a Sanskrit subhashita— “Paratantryābhibhūtasya deśasyābhyudayaḥ kutaḥ. Ataḥ svātantryamāptavyaṁ aikyaṁ svātantryasādhanam.”

Search This Blog