Despite NHRC plea, Gujarat govt says there is no need to pay compensation to victims of deadly silicosis

By A Representative
The Gujarat government has said it has “decided” not to pay Rs 5 lakh each as compensation against five confirmed cases of silicosis death, despite a National Human Right Commission (NHRC) direction to the state officialdom to do so. The workers died five years ago. This has been revealed in reply to a query under the right to information (RTI) to the Peoples Training and Research Center (PTRC), made to chief secretary, Government of Gujarat, Varesh Sinha, on April 7, 2014. The PTRC wished to know whether the state government had made up its mind to pay the amount due to the poor tribal families.
The chief secretary, refusing to directly answer the question, decided to hand over the decision to reply to the state labour and employment department. “In its reply dated April 29, 2014,the state labour and employment department made it clear that the government has decided not to enforce the NHRC recommendation, saying it is not in position to do so”, the PTRC has said, adding, “No reasons have been given. Further, in the reply, the state government has intimated its decision to the NHRC.”
The PTRC filed a complaint before NHRC in 2011 regarding the death of five workers from Dahod district in Gujarat, who had migrated to work in quartz crushing units in Godhra. At Godhra, PTRC said, these workers “were exposed to fine silica dust leading to silicosis, a fatal occupational lung disease.”
“Several workers have succumbed in their youth to the disease”, PTRC said in its statement, adding, “Though the units involved in crushing and polishing of the stone are covered under the employees’ state insurance (ESI) Act, none of them have so far been extended benefits. Survivors of the victims have never received any compensation or relief. As a result, public interest litigation (PIL) was filed in the Supreme Court of India by People's Rights and Social Research Centre (PRASAR) in 2006”.
"In this petition, the Supreme Court passed an interim in May 2009, directing the NHRC to go ahead with confirmed cases of silicosis deaths and order their relief. Following the order, and inspired by it, the PTRC made a plea before the NHRC to ensure payment to the five confirmed cases of death. The NHRC, after a lapse of two years, recommended on October 22, 2013 to the state government to pay Rs 5 lakh to the kin of those who had died. The NHRC sent official communication to the Government of Gujarat in this regard on March 3, 2014 giving six weeks time to enforce the recommendation”, the PTRC said.
Significantly, this was not the only plea to pay compensation. Earlier, in another complaint filed by one Juwan Singh, the NHRC directed the Government of Gujarat to pay Rs 3 lakh to each of the 238 families from Madhya Pradesh against the death of as many persons who in the state. “The Government of Gujarat argued that the workers from Madhya Pradesh may have worked in another state and got exposed to silica dust, hence it should not be held responsible for these deaths. That recommendation too has not been enforced”, PTRC’s Jagdish Patel said.
Patel wonders, “Is it this the much talked about Gujarat model? On one hand it has failed, in the name of good governance, to comply by provisions of the Factories Act by refusing to monitor silica dust and keep a tab on workers’ health. It has not ensured that the owners issue I-cards to the workers, are enrolled under the ESI Act, or are paid minimum wages. On the other, it is refusing to pay the relief amount, as recommended by NHRC.”

Comments

MG-NREGA: A global model still waiting to be fully implemented

By Bharat Dogra When the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MG-NREGA) was introduced in India nearly two decades ago, it drew worldwide attention. The reason was evident. At a time when states across much of the world were retreating from responsibility for livelihoods and welfare, the world’s second most populous country—with nearly two-thirds of its people living in rural or semi-rural areas—committed itself to guaranteeing 100 days of employment a year to its rural population.

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor* This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

Concerns raised over move to rename MGNREGA, critics call it politically motivated

By A Representative Concerns have been raised over the Union government’s reported move to rename the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), with critics describing it as a politically motivated step rather than an administrative reform. They argue that the proposed change undermines the legacy of Mahatma Gandhi and seeks to appropriate credit for a programme whose relevance has been repeatedly demonstrated, particularly during times of crisis.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Rollback of right to work? VB–GRAM G Bill 'dilutes' statutory employment guarantee

By A Representative The Right to Food Campaign has strongly condemned the passage of the Viksit Bharat – Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) (VB–GRAM G) Bill, 2025, describing it as a major rollback of workers’ rights and a fundamental dilution of the statutory Right to Work guaranteed under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA). In a statement, the Campaign termed the repeal of MGNREGA a “dark day for workers’ rights” and accused the government of converting a legally enforceable, demand-based employment guarantee into a centralised, discretionary welfare scheme.

From jobless to ‘job-loss’ growth: Experts critique gig economy and fintech risks

By A Representative Leading economists and social activists gathered in the capital on Friday to launch the third edition of the State of Finance in India Report 2024-25 , issuing a stark warning that the rapid digitalization of the Indian economy is eroding welfare systems and entrenching "digital dystopia."

School job scam and the future of university degree holders in West Bengal

By Harasankar Adhikari The school recruitment controversy in West Bengal has emerged as one of the most serious governance challenges in recent years, raising concerns about transparency, institutional accountability, and the broader impact on society. Allegations that school jobs were obtained through irregular means have led to prolonged legal scrutiny, involving both the Calcutta High Court and the Supreme Court of India. In one instance, a panel for high school teacher recruitment was ultimately cancelled after several years of service, following extended judicial proceedings and debate.

India’s Halal economy 'faces an uncertain future' under the new food Bill

By Syed Ali Mujtaba* The proposed Food Safety and Standards (Amendment) Bill, 2025 marks a decisive shift in India’s food regulation landscape by seeking to place Halal certification exclusively under government control while criminalising all private Halal certification bodies. Although the Bill claims to promote “transparency” and “standardisation,” its structure and implications raise serious concerns about religious freedom, economic marginalisation, and the systematic dismantling of a long-established, Muslim-led Halal ecosystem in India.

Women’s rights alliance seeks NCW action against Nitish Kumar over public veil incident

By A Representative An alliance of women’s rights activists has urged the National Commission for Women (NCW) to initiate legal action against Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar over an incident at a public function in Patna that they allege amounted to a grave violation of a Muslim woman’s dignity and constitutional rights. In a detailed complaint dated December 18, the All India Feminist Alliance (ALIFA), part of the National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM), sought the NCW’s immediate intervention following an episode on December 15 during the distribution of appointment letters to newly recruited AYUSH doctors in Patna.

Search This Blog