Gujarat High Court asked to "proactively disclose" monitoring system set up on pending cases

Rajagopalan near his office in Gandhinagar

By A Representative
In a major order, chief information commissioner (CIC), Gujarat, D Rajagopalan, has asked the Gujarat High Court to furnish all the necessary details sought by Kalpeshkumar L Gupta, under the right to information (RTI) Act, regarding “monitoring system” set up by the High Court on cases that are being fought in courts in Gujarat. The High Court’s public information officer (PIO), who is supposed to hear RTI cases, had rejected Gupta’s plea on July 2, 2012, saying, the information sought does not come “within the definition of information under the RTI Act.”
Academic associate at the Indian Institute of Management-Ahmedabad and PhD scholar at Gujarat National Law University, Gupta had sought, in his representation dated June 22, 2012, information on “the status of pending cases, monitoring the cases of subordinate judiciary, the periodicity of such monitoring and the use of information technology system for monitoring”, to quote Rajagopalan, former chief secretary under Narendra Modi. He passed his order against the Gujarat High Court’s PIO on May 6, 2014.
The order said, “Perusing the information sought by the appellant in his application, the commission feels that the appellant is keen to know as to whether the Gujarat High Court, the supreme supervisor of all the subordinate judicial institutions in the state, has any system of monitoring the disposal of cases and whether the information technology system is used for effective monitoring of the functioning of the subordinate judiciary.”
It ruled, “The information commission feels that the information sought by the appellant is well within the ambit of RTI Act and is covered within the definition of information under section 2 of the RTI Act.” Going further, it said, the information sought by Gupta fell under “proactive disclosure” which the Gujarat High Court ordinarily should make public on its own accord, without waiting for any RTI plea.
Rajagopalan insisted, “The commission feels that such information is normally covered under section 4 of the RTI Act and made a part of the proactive disclosure of the Gujarat High Court, so that the applicants come to know about the functioning of the Gujarat High Court and also monitoring of the subordinate courts. The Commission, therefore, feels that the information sought by the appellant needs to be given by the PIO and directs the PIO to give the information to the appellant within 30 days, free of cost, as per 7(6) of the RTI Act.”
Significantly, Rajagopalan’s order comes two years after he filed an appeal with the CIC’s office against the Gujarat High Court’s rejection of a request for information. Rapagopalan’s order admits, “The appellant approached the commission vide his representation dated August 1, 2012 under section 19 of the RTI Act against the decision of the first appellate authority on his application dated June 22, 2012 seeking information under section 6 of the RTI Act.”
The order in favour of Gupta was passed despite the fact that, according to Rajagopalan, during the hearing before him, “neither the appellant nor the representative of the public authority remained present.” His earlier appeal against the Gujarat High Court, he was told to his utter dismay, could not be found was “lost”, forcing Gupta to make another appeal.
Gupta said, following his repeated attempt to find the file which contained his request, the officials under the CIC “finally they found out the file and fixed date of hearing on May 6, 2014.” He added, this happened after a he filed a complaint filed on December 5, 2013, for which he got the letter of hearing. “Appeal was filed against High Court of Gujarat on August 8, 2012... Pathetic working of Gujarat State Information Commission”, he said.
This is the second major order by Rapagopalan against the Gujarat High Court’s PIO's refusal to part with information sought by a citizen. On November 12, 2013, Rajagopalan had asked the PIO and the appellate authority, who happens to be registrar, Gujarat High Court, to provide information regarding the number of leaves given to the court’s judges, as sought by an applicant. Social activist Indukumar Jani had sought information regarding judges’ leaves in 2010, arguing that people coming from far off areas, especially the tribal belt, often find that judges are not available on the date of hearing.
Jani was denied information citing Gujarat High Court rules for the right to information (RTI) Act, saying that anything that is not in "public domain" was exempted from granting information under the RTI. Rejecting the argument, in his ruling, Rajagopalan said, the officials of the High Court cannot act under their own RTI rules, which contradict the RTI Act. The rules of any organization are meant to the procedure to provide information works in well-oiled fashion. They cannot override provisions of the RTI Act.

Comments

Gujarat Information Commission issues warning against misinterpretation of RTI orders

By A Representative The Gujarat Information Commission (GIC) has issued a press note clarifying that its orders limiting the number of Right to Information (RTI) applications for certain individuals apply only to those specific applicants. The GIC has warned that it will take disciplinary action against any public officials who misinterpret these orders to deny information to other citizens. The press note, signed by GIC Secretary Jaideep Dwivedi, states that the Right to Information Act, 2005, is a powerful tool for promoting transparency and accountability in public administration. However, the commission has observed that some applicants are misusing the act by filing an excessive number of applications, which disproportionately consumes the time and resources of Public Information Officers (PIOs), First Appellate Authorities (FAAs), and the commission itself. This misuse can cause delays for genuine applicants seeking justice. In response to this issue, and in acc...

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor* This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

'MGNREGA crisis deepening': NSM demands fair wages and end to digital exclusions

By A Representative The NREGA Sangharsh Morcha (NSM), a coalition of independent unions of MGNREGA workers, has warned that the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) is facing a “severe crisis” due to persistent neglect and restrictive measures imposed by the Union Government.

Gandhiji quoted as saying his anti-untouchability view has little space for inter-dining with "lower" castes

By A Representative A senior activist close to Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA) leader Medha Patkar has defended top Booker prize winning novelist Arundhati Roy’s controversial utterance on Gandhiji that “his doctrine of nonviolence was based on an acceptance of the most brutal social hierarchy the world has ever known, the caste system.” Surprised at the police seeking video footage and transcript of Roy’s Mahatma Ayyankali memorial lecture at the Kerala University on July 17, Nandini K Oza in a recent blog quotes from available sources to “prove” that Gandhiji indeed believed in “removal of untouchability within the caste system.”

Targeted eviction of Bengali-speaking Muslims across Assam districts alleged

By A Representative A delegation led by prominent academic and civil rights leader Sandeep Pandey visited three districts in Assam—Goalpara, Dhubri, and Lakhimpur—between 2 and 4 September 2025 to meet families affected by recent demolitions and evictions. The delegation reported widespread displacement of Bengali-speaking Muslim communities, many of whom possess valid citizenship documents including Aadhaar, voter ID, ration cards, PAN cards, and NRC certification.

'Centre criminally negligent': SKM demands national disaster declaration in flood-hit states

By A Representative The Samyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM) has urged the Centre to immediately declare the recent floods and landslides in Punjab, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu & Kashmir, Uttarakhand, and Haryana as a national disaster, warning that the delay in doing so has deepened the suffering of the affected population.

Saffron Kingdom – a cinematic counter-narrative to The Kashmir Files

By Syed Ali Mujtaba* “Saffron Kingdom” is a film produced in the United States by members of the Kashmiri diaspora, positioned as a response to the 2022 release “The Kashmir Files.” While the latter focused on the exodus of Kashmiri Pandits and framed Kashmiri Muslims as perpetrators of violence, “Saffron Kingdom” seeks to present an alternate perspective—highlighting the experiences of Kashmiri Muslims facing alleged abuses by Indian security forces.

From lazy to lost? The myths and realities behind generational panic about youth

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak Older generations in many societies often describe the young with labels such as “lazy, unproductive, lost, anxious, depoliticised, unpatriotic or wayward.” Others see them as “social media, mobile phone and porn addicts.” Such judgments arise from a generational anxiety rooted in fears of losing control and from distorted perceptions about youth, especially in the context of economic crises, conflicts, and wars in which many young lives are lost.

'Govts must walk the talk on gender equality, right to health, human rights to deliver SDGs by 2030'

By A Representative With just 64 months left to deliver on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), global health and rights advocates have called upon governments to honour their commitments on gender equality and the human right to health. Speaking ahead of the 80th United Nations General Assembly (UNGA), experts warned that rising anti-rights and anti-gender pushes are threatening hard-won progress on SDG-3 (health and wellbeing) and SDG-5 (gender equality).

Counterview

Search This Blog