Skip to main content

Trade union rejects charge of bringing Bangladeshi labourers to Odisha mines

By A Representative
 
The Centre of Indian Trade Unions (CITU) has strongly refuted allegations that the organisation, or one of its senior Odisha leaders, supplied Bangladeshi labourers to mining sites in the Koira mining belt of Sundargarh and Keonjhar districts. The charge, directed at Jahangir Ali, State Vice President of CITU’s Odisha committee and a prominent leader of mine workers, was termed “false, conspiratorial and politically motivated.”
In a statement issued on January 8, CITU said the complaint stemmed from a letter dated January 5 by the Deputy Director of Mines, Koira division, seeking information from mining leaseholders about the alleged engagement of Bangladeshi labourers purportedly connected to Ali. CITU claimed the inquiry formed part of a wider “witch-hunt,” driven by the BJP government’s narrative of targeting so-called “guspaithiyas” or infiltrators.
The trade union alleged that Bengali-speaking migrant labourers from West Bengal working in Odisha were being wrongly branded as Bangladeshis for political gain, accusing the state government of using security concerns to advance divisive, communal objectives. According to the organisation, this tactic was being selectively deployed to harass labour organisers and weaken workers’ rights movements.
CITU linked the allegations to recent labour actions, including a successful struggle by contract mine workers against terminations by an Adani-operated mining facility, where the union claimed credit for ensuring continued employment. The statement described the current controversy as retaliation for that victory, asserting that the “double engine” BJP administration was siding with corporate interests and using accusations to discredit trade union leadership.
Calling the claims baseless, CITU urged workers and the wider public to recognise what it described as a “blame game” and remain vigilant against attempts to polarise society and undermine labour rights. The statement was signed by General Secretary Elamaram Kareem.

Comments

TRENDING

How strategic is India's commercial expansion in the Mediterranean?

By Vijay Prashad  On 26 October 2026, Greece’s foreign minister George Gerapetritis stood at the United Nations headquarters and rejected the maritime agreement between Turkey and Libya. Gerapetritis spoke on behalf of Greece of course, but also Bahrain, Cyprus, Egypt, the European Union, and the United Arab Emirates. Five days later, the Indian frigate INS Trishul entered Souda Bay in Crete as part of activities with the US Navy installation (Naval Support Activity) and with the NATO Maritime Interdiction Operational Training Centre. The sequence illuminates a developing strategic geography: India’s naval reach, its confrontation with Pakistan’s new Turkish partner, and its ambition to connect Indian capital to European markets increasingly converge in the eastern Mediterranean.

Letter to Modi seeks cancellation of "coercive" anti-NGO order on foreign funding rules

By A Representative  Around 70 civil rights organizations have come together to strategize “a collective response to the stifling of civil society space” in the wake of the recent Government of India clampdown on NGOs, telling Prime Minister Narendra Modi that government steps are “coercive” in nature, are “without reasonable cause or due process”, and seek to “cripple” the ability of NGOs to “carry on their legitimate and sanctioned work.”

The Modi-Adani relationship: Corporate power, political proximity and accountability

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan   India's economic transformation over the past decade has been marked by ambitious infrastructure projects, increased global investment and the emergence of powerful corporate conglomerates. Alongside this growth, however, concerns about crony capitalism, the concentration of economic power and the influence of political connections on business opportunities have become increasingly prominent.