Skip to main content

Only one Indian national park rated ‘good’ by IUCN: Concerns over ecological governance

By Jag Jivan    
Environmental policy expert Shankar Sharma has written to the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) and its affiliated institutions, expressing grave concern over India’s deteriorating ecological health. Citing the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN)’s latest global review, which found that only Khangchendzonga National Park received a “Good” rating among 107 national parks, Sharma warned that the findings reveal a “serious concern for the overall health of the country’s flora, fauna, and environment.”
Sharma noted that India’s two globally recognized biodiversity hotspots — the Western Ghats and the Eastern Himalayas — continue to face “continuous desecration of their ecological sanctity.” He criticised the apparent failure of statutory and research bodies under the MoEF&CC, such as the Wildlife Institute of India (WII), National Biodiversity Authority (NBA), and National Tiger Conservation Authority (NTCA), for not preventing or publicly opposing widespread deforestation and forest diversions even within protected areas.
Referring to recent media reports, Sharma highlighted that “over 500 projects in India’s protected areas and eco-sensitive zones were cleared by the National Board for Wildlife between 2014 and 2018,” and that the country’s forest and tree cover remains at about 22%, far below the 33% target of the National Forest Policy. “It should shock any rational observer that none of these specialised bodies are seen as truly concerned about the continuous loss of flora and fauna,” he said.
Drawing attention to the proposed 2000 MW pumped storage project in the Sharavathi LTM Wildlife Sanctuary in Karnataka, Sharma alleged that authorities were “ignoring serious ecological warnings” despite field reports highlighting rich biodiversity in the project zone. “The Ministry’s in-principle nod to this project, which will destroy nearly 400 acres of tropical rainforest, represents a deplorable disregard for scientific and constitutional duties,” he stated.
Sharma also referred to the State of Forest Report 2023, which recorded over 46,000 sq km of forest loss within a decade, and to the UNEP Global Foresight Report on Planetary Health, stressing that India faces growing threats from deforestation, desertification, and biodiversity loss. “If the MoEF&CC and its subordinate institutions continue to ignore credible scientific warnings, the very purpose of maintaining so many specialised agencies at public expense will be questioned,” he cautioned.
Calling for a complete policy review, Sharma urged the Ministry to ensure that statutory bodies under its purview “take their constitutional and environmental responsibilities seriously” to safeguard India’s remaining forests and biodiversity.

Comments

TRENDING

Gharapuri's discoveries: India finds a maritime past, ASI an app

By Gajanan Khergamker  The Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) has once again demonstrated an extraordinary talent for mistaking administrative housekeeping for institutional achievement. At the very moment excavations at Gharapuri are yielding evidence that could fundamentally reshape our understanding of India's maritime past, the institution has chosen to celebrate the rollout of QR-enabled audio guides and GPS-supported navigation at its monuments. The contrast could not be starker. 

Bihar’s land at ₹1 per acre for Adani sparks outrage, NAPM calls it crony capitalism

By A Representative   The National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM) has strongly condemned the Bihar government’s decision to lease 1,050 acres of land in Pirpainti, Bhagalpur district, to Adani Power for a 2,400 MW coal-based thermal power project. 

What's behind Columbia's president-elect speaking out against continuing the country’s peace agenda

By Laura Violeta Devia López  There are just over three weeks left before Abelardo De La Espriella takes office as Colombia’s new president, despite the numerous allegations that cast a shadow over his election and, as usual, discredit the Colombian electoral system. The announcements already being made by Abelardo and his designated cabinet mark a significant change of course, not only for the Colombian people but also for the country’s place in the world.