Adivasi rights group slams Supreme Court ruling on post-facto clearances

By A Representative

The Adivasi Adhikar Rashtriya Manch (AARM) has criticised a Supreme Court judgment that permits post-facto environmental clearances for projects begun without prior approval, calling the decision a major setback for environmental safeguards and Adivasi rights.

The ruling reverses the earlier Vanashakti judgment, which had struck down a central government notification allowing such post-facto clearances. AARM described the latest decision as “regressive” and said it effectively rewards violators while undermining the precautionary principle central to environmental regulation. The organisation argued that the judgment aligns with what it called the Centre’s pro-corporate approach to diluting rigorous environmental impact assessments.

AARM noted that the verdict came on a review petition filed by real estate developers, despite the absence of a review plea from the concerned ministry. The group endorsed the dissenting opinion of Justice Ujjal Bhuiyan, who, along with Justice Abhay Oka in the earlier bench, had held that the right to a safe environment is part of the fundamental right to life under Article 21. The dissent warned that treating environmental compliance as an obstruction to development would overturn decades of established jurisprudence.

According to AARM, the judgment poses serious implications for Adivasi communities, especially those in mineral-rich regions. It said the ruling could embolden mining and power companies to begin work without conducting environmental impact assessments or complying with laws that mandate prior consent from Gram Sabhas. The organisation cited a recent case in Chhattisgarh where a mining company felled trees without required permissions, and the court allowed the project to continue on the grounds that the violations were already committed.

AARM has demanded that the decision be reviewed again and that the Vanashakti judgment authored by Justice Abhay Oka be reinstated.

The statement was issued by AARM chairperson Jitendra Chaudhury and national coordinator Pulin Bihari Baske. The release was circulated from the organisation’s New Delhi office.

Grain vs. gasoline: How the global biofuel boom threatens India’s food and water security

By Rajiv Shah A new report published by the international research and advocacy organization GRAIN has warned that the global resurgence of biofuels is triggering a dangerous dynamic of “more fuel, less food, more land grabs.” Driven by intersecting energy security concerns, geopolitical tensions, and aggressive decarbonization mandates, the expanding agrofuel industry is increasingly pitting corporate energy interests against global food security and indigenous land rights.

Can free‑living Indian street dogs teach us about how to care for pet dogs?

By Daniel Ramp, Kapil Vishwas Patwardhan, Rosalie Chapple We give our pet dogs shelter, veterinary care, affection, training and play. We decide when they eat, where they sleep, when they go outside, who they meet, and how they move through the world.

Sikkim governor row: ALIFA asks centre to explain hurried appointment in Ankita Bhandari case

By A Representative The All-India Feminist Alliance (ALIFA) on Saturday expressed “immense pain and outrage” that even after four years and a national uproar, justice has not been fully delivered in the Ankita Bhandari murder case and that a ruling party politician facing allegations has been “gifted a high-ranking constitutional office.” In a statement, ALIFA extended “unflinching solidarity” to Ankita’s parents, who it said are “fighting for justice on the streets of Delhi,” and demanded that pending the CBI inquiry and judicial decision, the appointment of BJP leader Dushyant Kumar Gautam as Sikkim’s Governor be subject to “immediate presidential review.”

Counterview

Search This Blog