Skip to main content

Rutgers academic event on Hindutva draws political backlash, security concerns

By A Representative
 
An academic event at Rutgers University examining Hindu nationalism in the United States has triggered controversy and political reactions, with its organizers reporting online harassment and threats.
The October 27 discussion, titled “Hindutva in America: A Threat to Equality and Religious Pluralism,” was hosted by the university’s Center for Security, Race, and Rights (CSRR). The event explored findings from a recent report that documents what it describes as the growing influence of Hindutva-linked networks in the U.S., including their alleged role in promoting hate and intimidation.
Following the announcement of the event, Rutgers professor of South Asian history Audrey Truschke (photo) said she and fellow panelists received death threats, including one post urging that the speakers be “burned alive.” Truschke has previously faced online harassment for her criticism of Hindu nationalist politics in India.
The Indian American Muslim Council (IAMC), a Washington-based advocacy group, called for protection of all organizers, academics, and students involved. IAMC president Mohammed Jawad said that academic scrutiny of Hindu nationalism “is not only protected free speech but necessary to safeguard minority rights,” while emphasizing that Hinduism as a faith must not be conflated with political Hindutva ideology.
However, several lawmakers — Congress members Sanford Bishop, Suhas Subramanyam, Rich McCormick, and Shri Thanedar — criticized the event and the CSRR report, arguing that it risked “singling out Hindu Americans” and urging Rutgers to promote “diverse perspectives.”
The episode echoes earlier disputes over academic discussions of Hindutva, such as the 2021 Dismantling Global Hindutva Conference, which faced similar backlash and online abuse directed at speakers.
Scholars and human rights researchers say that conflating Hinduism with Hindutva can stifle legitimate academic inquiry and debate. Groups such as the Southern Poverty Law Center and Georgetown University’s Bridge Initiative have previously documented connections between U.S.-based Hindu nationalist organizations and far-right movements in India.
IAMC urged civic groups and universities to support Rutgers’ academic independence and the safety of its participants amid continuing online threats.

Comments

TRENDING

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”

If Maoist violence is illegitimate, how is Hindutva, state violence justified? Can right-wing wash off its sins?

By Swami Agnivesh* and Sandeep Pandey** There was major police action against Sudha Bhardwaj, Gautam Navlakha, Varvara Rao, Vernon Gonsalves and Arun Ferreira on 28 August, 2018. Before this police arrested Professor Shoma Sen, Adocate Sudhir Gadling, Sudhir Dhawle, Mahesh Raut and Rona Wilson on 6 June. Even before this Dr. Binayak Sen, Soni Sori, Ajay TG, Professor GN Saibaba and Prashant Rahi have been arrested and all these activists have been accused of having links with Maoists.

Caste 'continues to influence' hiring, wages, migration patterns in India

By Rajiv Shah  A recent academic study has highlighted how caste and social identity continue to shape employment opportunities, wages and access to secure livelihoods in India, even as the country projects itself as one of the world’s fastest-growing economies. The findings, published in the 2026 Springer volume Unequal Opportunities: An Analysis of Inequalities in Employment Opportunities Among Different Social Groups in Labor Markets of India , argue that structural discrimination remains embedded in both formal and informal labour markets.