Skip to main content

Automation cuts women’s jobs by 80% in Ahmedabad construction industry: Study

By Jag Jivan 
Automation in India’s construction industry is deepening gender disparities and eroding livelihoods for thousands of women workers, particularly those from marginalised communities, according to a new study titled Building Futures: Automation and Gender Disparities in Construction – The Case of Ahmedabad, Gujarat
Conducted by Aajeevika Bureau and Work Fair and Free, and led by researchers Geeta Thatra and Saloni Mundra, the study draws on feminist participatory action research between 2023 and 2025 to map how technological change is reshaping labour hierarchies in one of the country’s largest employment sectors.
The report notes that India’s construction industry contributes “nearly 9 per cent to GDP and employs around 68 million workers, including 7.6 million women,” making it the second-largest employer after agriculture. 
Yet, “women’s participation in construction has shown a secular decline,” reflecting broader national trends of falling female labour force participation. Women, typically employed as unskilled helpers, remain at the bottom of a rigid hierarchy, performing physically demanding and hazardous work that is undervalued and invisible.
Technological adoption — from automated machinery and concrete batching plants to Building Information Modelling (BIM), drones, and precast systems — is accelerating in Ahmedabad and Gandhinagar. But instead of expanding opportunities, these innovations have “reduced on-site labour demand and deepened fragmentation by extending contractual chains,” the study finds. 
“Formwork, concrete production, use of automated equipment, shift from bricks to AAC blocks, and pre-cast technologies lead to a decline of up to 80 per cent in the use of female low-skilled labour,” the authors observe.
As automation spreads, women’s roles in material handling, plastering, and concrete mixing have been largely displaced. “In one large precast factory, hundreds of single male migrants from UP and Bihar dominated production roles, while only 40 migrant families were present, with women confined to cleaning,” the report documents. 
Even as the workforce shifts towards skilled machine operators, “the consistent exclusion of women workers from both skilled trades and emerging technical roles illustrates how technological change perpetuates rather than disrupts gendered divisions of labour.”
The research also highlights how gendered exclusion interacts with migration patterns. Builders increasingly prefer long-distance male migrants from northern and eastern states, marginalising Bhil Adivasi women from Gujarat, Rajasthan, and Madhya Pradesh who “have historically sustained the industry.” Women’s employment is further constrained by “jodi-based hiring,” where couples are recruited together, undermining women’s independent work status, and by a lack of childcare, sanitation, and safety provisions.
While automation has been promoted as a solution to worker shortages, the report argues that “technological change unfolds within a stratified labour market structured by gender, ethnicity, and migration.” The result is “more precarious employment, limited visibility, and reduced access to rights, protections, and grievance mechanisms.”
Yet the study also records agency and resilience among women workers. “Despite these challenges, women are not passive subjects of automation,” it notes. “They display ambivalent responses, ranging from adjustment and informal learning to collective organising.” Many continue to aspire for training and inclusion in skilled roles, reflecting “a complex interplay of structural constraints and agency.”
The report calls for a reimagined policy framework that couples technological progress with gender equity. It urges the state, industry, and civil society to invest in women’s training in new technologies, set inclusion targets in public projects, and ensure social protection and workplace safety. 
“A more equitable future of work in construction,” it concludes, “will require not only inclusive training and employment practices but also structural support in the form of care infrastructure, social protection, and recognition of women’s labour, regardless of automation’s pace or reach.”
As India’s construction sector grows increasingly mechanised, Building Futures delivers a stark warning: without deliberate intervention, the Fourth Industrial Revolution risks reinforcing, rather than reducing, gender inequality at the very foundations of the country’s urban development.

Comments

TRENDING

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”

If Maoist violence is illegitimate, how is Hindutva, state violence justified? Can right-wing wash off its sins?

By Swami Agnivesh* and Sandeep Pandey** There was major police action against Sudha Bhardwaj, Gautam Navlakha, Varvara Rao, Vernon Gonsalves and Arun Ferreira on 28 August, 2018. Before this police arrested Professor Shoma Sen, Adocate Sudhir Gadling, Sudhir Dhawle, Mahesh Raut and Rona Wilson on 6 June. Even before this Dr. Binayak Sen, Soni Sori, Ajay TG, Professor GN Saibaba and Prashant Rahi have been arrested and all these activists have been accused of having links with Maoists.

Caste 'continues to influence' hiring, wages, migration patterns in India

By Rajiv Shah  A recent academic study has highlighted how caste and social identity continue to shape employment opportunities, wages and access to secure livelihoods in India, even as the country projects itself as one of the world’s fastest-growing economies. The findings, published in the 2026 Springer volume Unequal Opportunities: An Analysis of Inequalities in Employment Opportunities Among Different Social Groups in Labor Markets of India , argue that structural discrimination remains embedded in both formal and informal labour markets.