Skip to main content

A trillion-dollar injustice: Why the US must end six decades long blockade of Cuba

By Bharat Dogra 
 
Despite decades of international condemnation and repeated United Nations resolutions, the United States continues to enforce one of the most enduring and punitive embargoes in modern history against Cuba. The measures have become so sweeping and entrenched that they are best described as a blockade rather than an embargo. This blockade has cost Cuba over a trillion dollars in lost trade and economic opportunities, while also hurting American businesses that could benefit from normal relations with the island nation.
The human cost has been even greater. Essential supplies such as food, medicine, and equipment have often been denied or delayed, creating hardships for ordinary Cubans. The country faced its most severe crisis after the collapse of the Soviet Union, when its trade network fell apart, and again during the COVID-19 pandemic. Yet, despite these enormous challenges, Cuba’s health indicators remain on par with those of the United States, with similar rates of infant and child mortality and a life expectancy of around 78 years. The country also continues to rank in the “high human development” category on the UN Human Development Index.
For more than six decades, this blockade has persisted with only minor, temporary relaxations. Every year for over thirty years, the UN General Assembly has overwhelmingly voted in favor of resolutions condemning the blockade as a violation of the UN Charter and international law. More than 90 percent of member nations—including the European Union, Canada, and nearly all of America’s allies—support these resolutions. Israel remains the only major nation consistently siding with Washington.
Even within the United States, several political and business leaders have opposed the policy. Former Secretary of State George P. Shultz called it “insane,” while former Senator and presidential candidate George McGovern bluntly described it as “a stupid policy.” Both Presidents Jimmy Carter and Barack Obama attempted limited normalization of relations, but their modest achievements were swiftly reversed by their successors. The Trump administration went further, tightening restrictions and deepening the suffering of ordinary Cubans.
Prominent human rights organizations—including Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights—have also called for an end to the blockade. Legal experts have described it as a violation of international law. In a study published in the Western Reserve Journal of International Law, Paul A. Shenyer and Virginia Barta concluded that the blockade “constituted an illegal act” and a “flagrant violation of the contemporary standard founded on economic principles and sovereign equality between states.”
The United States has justified its stance by citing events from the early 1960s, when Cuba nationalized U.S.-owned refineries and other assets without compensation. Yet the broader context reveals that Washington had already taken hostile steps—cutting off oil supplies and refusing to process Soviet crude that Cuba had imported to keep its economy running. When the U.S. abruptly ended sugar imports, Cuba was left with little choice but to nationalize and reorient its economy.
Today, the blockade’s extraterritorial reach extends far beyond U.S. borders, punishing foreign firms that engage with Cuba and discouraging investment in vital sectors like oil exploration. The result has been lost revenue, persistent shortages, and immense hardship for an island nation striving for self-reliance. Despite this, Cuba continues to display remarkable resilience. Its agroecological farming model has earned international praise, and its medical brigades have offered humanitarian aid in over forty countries during crises and disasters.
This enduring policy of isolation and punishment serves no constructive purpose. It has failed to bring political change, undermines the credibility of U.S. foreign policy, and inflicts needless suffering on the Cuban people. After six and a half decades, it is time for Washington to heed global opinion, uphold the principles of international law, and lift the blockade—permanently.
No more. The U.S. blockade of Cuba must go away, and never return.
---
The writer is Honorary Convener of the Campaign to Save Earth Now. His recent books include Man Over Machine (Mahatma Gandhi’s Ideas for Present Times), When the Two Streams Met (Freedom Movement of India), A Day in 2071, and Planet in Peril

Comments

TRENDING

What Sister Nivedita understood about India that we have forgotten

By Harasankar Adhikari   In the idea of a “Vikshit Bharat,” many real problems—hunger, poverty, ill health, unemployment, and joblessness—are increasingly overshadowed by the religious contest between Hindu and Muslim fundamentalisms. This contest is often sponsored and patronised by political parties across the spectrum, whether openly Hindutva-oriented, Islamist, partisan, or self-proclaimed secular.

The rise of the civilizational state: Prof. Pratap Bhanu Mehta warns of new authoritarianism

By A Representative   Noted political theorist and public intellectual Professor Pratap Bhanu Mehta delivered a poignant reflection on the changing nature of the Indian state today, warning that the rise of a "civilizational state" poses a significant threat to the foundations of modern democracy and individual freedom. Delivering the Achyut Yagnik Memorial Lecture titled "The Idea of Civilization: Poison or Cure?" at the Ahmedabad Management Association, Mehta argued that India is currently witnessing a self-conscious political project that seeks to redefine the state not as a product of a modern constitution, but as an instrument of an ancient, authentic civilization.

Why experts say replacing MGNREGA could undo two decades of rural empowerment

By A Representative   A group of scientists, academics, civil society organisations and field practitioners from India and abroad has issued an open letter urging the Union government to reconsider the repeal of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) and to withdraw the newly enacted Viksit Bharat–Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) Act, 2025. The letter, dated December 27, 2025, comes days after the VB–G RAM G Bill was introduced in the Lok Sabha on December 16 and subsequently approved by both Houses of Parliament, formally replacing the two-decade-old employment guarantee law.

NYT: RSS 'infiltrates' institutions, 'drives' religious divide under Modi's leadership

By Jag Jivan   A comprehensive New York Times investigation published on December 26, 2025, chronicles the rise of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) — characterized as a far-right Hindu nationalist organization — from a shadowy group founded in 1925 to the world's largest right-wing force, marking its centenary in 2025 with unprecedented influence and mainstream acceptance. Prime Minister Narendra Modi , who joined the RSS as a young boy and later became a full-time campaigner before being deputized to its political wing in the 1980s, delivered his strongest public tribute to the group in his August 2025 Independence Day address. Speaking from the Red Fort , he called the RSS a "giant river" with dozens of streams touching every aspect of Indian life, praising its "service, dedication, organization, and unmatched discipline." The report describes how the RSS has deeply infiltrated India's institutions — government, courts, police, media, and academia — ...

India’s universities lag global standards, pushing students overseas: NITI Aayog study

By Rajiv Shah   A new Government of India study, Internationalisation of Higher Education in India: Prospects, Potential, and Policy Recommendations , prepared by NITI Aayog , regrets that India’s lag in this sector is the direct result of “several systemic challenges such as inadequate infrastructure to provide quality education and deliver world-class research, weak industry–academia collaboration, and outdated curricula.”

Interfaith cooperation in Punjab village as Sikhs and Hindus support mosque construction

By Bharat Dogra   A recent heart-warming report on Sikh and Hindu families helping to build a mosque in a village of Punjab deserves wide attention. It is such examples that truly strengthen national unity. There are many instances of mutual respect and cooperation among people of different religions and faiths that need to be better known today.

'Caste oppression ignored': NCERT textbooks reflect ideological bias, says historian

By A Representative   The Indian History Forum organized a webinar titled “Rewriting the Past: Distortions and Ideological Interventions in NCERT History Textbooks” on 22 December 2025. The session featured historian Dr Ruchika Sharma, who critically examined recent changes in NCERT history textbooks and their implications for historical understanding and social cohesion among millions of students across the country.  

Investment in rule of law a corporate imperative, not charity: Business, civil society leaders

By A Representative   In a compelling town hall discussion hosted at L.J School of Law , prominent voices from industry and civil society underscored that corporate investment in strengthening the rule of law is not an act of charity but a critical business strategy for building a safer, stronger, and developed India by 2047. The dialogue, part of the Unmute podcast series, examined the intrinsic link between ethical business conduct , robust legal frameworks, and sustainable national development, against the sobering backdrop of India ranking 79th out of 142 countries on the global Rule of Law Index .

When a city rebuilt forgets its builders: Migrant workers’ struggle for sanitation in Bhuj

Khasra Ground site By Aseem Mishra*  Access to safe drinking water and sanitation is not a privilege—it is a fundamental human right. This principle has been unequivocally recognised by the United Nations and repeatedly affirmed by the Supreme Court of India as intrinsic to the right to life and dignity under Article 21 of the Constitution. Yet, for thousands of migrant workers living in Bhuj, this right remains elusive, exposing a troubling disconnect between constitutional guarantees, policy declarations, and lived reality.