Skip to main content

Why denying statehood to Palestine cannot herald peace in Middle-East

By Dr. Manoj Kumar Mishra* 
Israel’s large-scale military campaign in response to the October 7, 2023, Hamas attacks—widely condemned for their brutality and violation of Israeli sovereignty—has since resulted in significant destruction and displacement in Gaza, accompanied by expanded settlements and increased violence in the West Bank. The long-pursued two-state solution to the Israel-Palestine conflict now appears more elusive than ever.
In the lead-up to a proposed United Nations conference on Palestinian statehood—an initiative led by France and scheduled for June—Israel launched missile strikes on Iran. This escalated into a 12-day military confrontation, which also had the effect of derailing momentum toward international dialogue on Palestinian recognition. While these strikes were presented as targeting Iranian nuclear capabilities, they also served to delay, if not derail, diplomatic attention to the Palestinian cause.
Despite global debates over statehood, the U.S. under the Trump administration showed little support for Palestinian aspirations. The administration sanctioned International Criminal Court (ICC) judges following the issuance of an arrest warrant against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the investigation of alleged Israeli human rights violations. President Trump even suggested the evacuation of Gaza’s population without addressing the practicalities of relocation, aligning with his vision of a “Riviera of the Middle East.”
Since the establishment of Israel in 1948, the U.S.—the first country to recognize Israel—has consistently backed its territorial claims and military campaigns, often at the expense of addressing Palestinian sovereignty. Israeli leadership has repeatedly dismissed the possibility of Palestinian statehood in public statements. When momentum has built internationally around recognizing Palestine, the U.S. and some European allies have frequently provided diplomatic support to Israeli efforts to counter it.
Prime Minister Netanyahu, since returning to power, has actively weakened the Oslo Accord framework of a two-state solution by promoting settlement expansion in the West Bank and undermining the Palestinian Authority. These measures have contributed to the erosion of moderate Palestinian political structures while emboldening radical factions. Israel, designated a “major non-NATO ally” of the U.S., benefits from preferential access to American military platforms and technologies. U.S. military aid reached unprecedented levels during Israel’s recent campaigns in Gaza, which according to UN reports, resulted in the deaths of approximately 1,200 Israelis and over 40,000 Palestinians. U.S. support has also been crucial in Israeli operations targeting Hezbollah in Lebanon and engagements with Iranian-backed militias.
Peace in the Middle East Remains Elusive
The current ceasefire in Gaza reflects a tactical pause rather than a comprehensive solution. It has not curtailed Israeli resettlement activities in Gaza and the West Bank, nor has it resolved the broader conflict. Efforts to eliminate Hamas and other militant groups have not addressed the root causes of resistance stemming from occupation and disenfranchisement.
Israel’s push toward a de facto one-state solution—through territorial expansion—seeks to erase the basis for Palestinian claims to sovereignty. Violence by settlers, often supported or ignored by security forces, contributes to an atmosphere of intimidation and displacement. While the 2002 Arab Peace Initiative advocated a two-state resolution to bring stability and peace to the region, Israel has engaged in hostilities not only with Hamas in Gaza but also with Hezbollah in Lebanon, Iran, and its proxies in Syria and Iraq—further undermining that vision.
The peace processes Israel has engaged in with Arab countries have notably excluded Palestinian concerns, raising questions about their long-term viability. Recent developments, including Israel’s Gaza operations, have triggered widespread anger across the Gulf region. The U.S. has been deeply involved in supporting Israel’s military efforts, including direct engagements with groups like the Houthis in Yemen, who disrupted Red Sea trade routes in protest. The challenges faced by the U.S. in responding to these disruptions ultimately led to a ceasefire agreement with the Houthis—negotiated without Israeli involvement.
Even Israel’s possession of nuclear weapons has not deterred missile attacks from Iran and its allied militias. Conventional conflicts in the region are likely to continue unless the core issue of Palestinian statehood is addressed. Without confronting this reality, neither U.S. nor European visions of peace can materialize. Sustainable peace in the Middle East demands acknowledging Palestinian aspirations and engaging with them as part of any long-term solution.
---
*Senior Lecturer, SVM Autonomous College, Jagatsinghpur, Odisha

Comments

TRENDING

Stronger India–Russia partnership highlights a missed energy breakthrough

By N.S. Venkataraman*  The recent visit of Russian President Vladimir Putin to India was widely publicized across several countries and has attracted significant global attention. The warmth with which Mr. Putin was received by Prime Minister Narendra Modi was particularly noted, prompting policy planners worldwide to examine the implications of this cordial relationship for the global economy and political climate. India–Russia relations have stood on a strong foundation for decades and have consistently withstood geopolitical shifts. This is in marked contrast to India’s ties with the United States, which have experienced fluctuations under different U.S. administrations.

From natural farming to fair prices: Young entrepreneurs show a new path

By Bharat Dogra   There have been frequent debates on agro-business companies not showing adequate concern for the livelihoods of small farmers. Farmers’ unions have often protested—generally with good reason—that while they do not receive fair returns despite high risks and hard work, corporate interests that merely process the crops produced by farmers earn disproportionately high profits. Hence, there is a growing demand for alternative models of agro-business development that demonstrate genuine commitment to protecting farmer livelihoods.

The Vande Mataram debate and the politics of manufactured controversy

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The recent Vande Mataram debate in Parliament was never meant to foster genuine dialogue. Each political party spoke past the other, addressing its own constituency, ensuring that clips went viral rather than contributing to meaningful deliberation. The objective was clear: to construct a Hindutva narrative ahead of the Bengal elections. Predictably, the Lok Sabha will likely expunge the opposition’s “controversial” remarks while retaining blatant inaccuracies voiced by ministers and ruling-party members. The BJP has mastered the art of inserting distortions into parliamentary records to provide them with a veneer of historical legitimacy.

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

Thota Sitaramaiah: An internal pillar of an underground organisation

By Harsh Thakor*  Thota Sitaramaiah was regarded within his circles as an example of the many individuals whose work in various underground movements remained largely unknown to the wider public. While some leaders become visible through organisational roles or media attention, many others contribute quietly, without public recognition. Sitaramaiah was considered one such figure. He passed away on December 8, 2025, at the age of 65.

Epic war against caste system is constitutional responsibility of elected government

Edited by well-known Gujarat Dalit rights leader Martin Macwan, the book, “Bhed-Bharat: An Account of Injustice and Atrocities on Dalits and Adivasis (2014-18)” (available in English and Gujarati*) is a selection of news articles on Dalits and Adivasis (2014-2018) published by Dalit Shakti Prakashan, Ahmedabad. Preface to the book, in which Macwan seeks to answer key questions on why the book is needed today: *** The thought of compiling a book on atrocities on Dalits and thus present an overall Indian picture had occurred to me a long time ago. Absence of such a comprehensive picture is a major reason for a weak social and political consciousness among Dalits as well as non-Dalits. But gradually the idea took a different form. I found that lay readers don’t understand numbers and don’t like to read well-researched articles. The best way to reach out to them was storytelling. As I started writing in Gujarati and sharing the idea of the book with my friends, it occurred to me that while...

New RTI draft rules inspired by citizen-unfriendly, overtly bureaucratic approach

By Venkatesh Nayak* The Department of Personnel and Training , Government of India has invited comments on a new set of Draft Rules (available in English only) to implement The Right to Information Act, 2005 . The RTI Rules were last amended in 2012 after a long period of consultation with various stakeholders. The Government’s move to put the draft RTI Rules out for people’s comments and suggestions for change is a welcome continuation of the tradition of public consultation. Positive aspects of the Draft RTI Rules While 60-65% of the Draft RTI Rules repeat the content of the 2012 RTI Rules, some new aspects deserve appreciation as they clarify the manner of implementation of key provisions of the RTI Act. These are: Provisions for dealing with non-compliance of the orders and directives of the Central Information Commission (CIC) by public authorities- this was missing in the 2012 RTI Rules. Non-compliance is increasingly becoming a major problem- two of my non-compliance cases are...

Proposals for Babri Masjid, Ram Temple spark fears of polarisation before West Bengal polls

By A Representative   A political debate has emerged in West Bengal following recent announcements about plans for new religious structures in Murshidabad district, including a proposed mosque to be named Babri Masjid and a separate announcement by a BJP leader regarding the construction of a Ram temple in another location within Behrampur.

Urgent need to study cause of large number of natural deaths in Gulf countries

By Venkatesh Nayak* According to data tabled in Parliament in April 2018, there are 87.76 lakh (8.77 million) Indians in six Gulf countries, namely Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). While replying to an Unstarred Question (#6091) raised in the Lok Sabha, the Union Minister of State for External Affairs said, during the first half of this financial year alone (between April-September 2018), blue-collared Indian workers in these countries had remitted USD 33.47 Billion back home. Not much is known about the human cost of such earnings which swell up the country’s forex reserves quietly. My recent RTI intervention and research of proceedings in Parliament has revealed that between 2012 and mid-2018 more than 24,570 Indian Workers died in these Gulf countries. This works out to an average of more than 10 deaths per day. For every US$ 1 Billion they remitted to India during the same period there were at least 117 deaths of Indian Workers in Gulf ...