Skip to main content

Domestic political considerations? War between Cambodia and Thailand around an ancient temple

By Kay Young 

The long-simmering border dispute between Cambodia and Thailand has escalated into open violence, with both sides exchanging artillery and air fire near the ancient Preah Vihear temple complex. At the time of writing, reports of what is happening on the ground are still unclear. In Surin province a petrol station and 7-11 were hit, supposedly by a missile, killing two civilians; a Thai F-16 fighter jet has also reportedly been downed. This latest flare-up seems to be the most serious military clash between the neighbouring nations since the Cold War, reviving historical tensions that date back to colonial-era border disputes.
The conflict's origins trace to 1962 when the International Court of Justice awarded sovereignty of the 11th century Khmer temple to Cambodia, though the surrounding territory remained contested. Periodic flare-ups occurred over subsequent decades, most notably in 2008 when Cambodia’s successful UNESCO World Heritage listing for the temple sparked nationalist protests in Thailand. The situation turned deadly in 2011 when sustained fighting killed dozens and displaced thousands before international intervention temporarily calmed tensions.
Recent months saw renewed friction as Cambodia expanded infrastructure near the border while Thailand increased military patrols in the area. In late May, a Cambodian soldier was killed by Royal Thai Army soldiers, sparking huge nationalist protests across Cambodia.
The immediate trigger for this week's violence remains unclear, with each side claiming that the other fired first. Domestic political considerations in both nations seem to be playing a significant role, particularly in Thailand where the Royal Thai Military establishment has historically operated with almost complete autonomy from civilian leadership.
A leaked phone conversation between Cambodian de facto leader Hun Sen (father of current Prime Minister Hun Manet) and then Thai Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra last month revealed attempts at private diplomacy amid the public crisis. Paetongtarn sought to calm tensions, urging restraint, while Hun Sen expressed frustration over Thai military movements near the border.
In the call Paetongtarn expresses her dismay at her lack of control over the Royal Thai Military at the border. She said, regarding a Royal Thai Military General, “He is on the opposite side (to her)”. This was a clear reference to an open secret in the region: that the Royal Thai Army—responsible for more coups than any other military in modern history—does not answer to a civilian parliament.
The leaking of the phone call led to Paetongtarns dismissal as Prime Minister by the Constitutional Court a few weeks later, severely weakening the Phue Thai party’s already fragile coalition. The pro-peasant Phue Thai party has repeatedly been ousted from government via military coup d'état in the past two decades. As such, the recent tension on the border, and outbreak of all out war, cannot be viewed in isolation as a simple State-on-State or Thailand vs Cambodia battle.
Hun Sen had ruled Cambodia for 38 years (1985–2023) before transferring power to his son, Hun Manet, in August 2023. In an oddly similar circumstance, Paetongtarn Shinawatra is the daughter of former Thai Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra. Both fathers are considered the real powers behind the office and historically enjoyed close family ties; it was revealed by Wikileaks that Thaksin even backed Hun Sen on Cambodia’s claim to the Preah Vihear Temple around 2009. Indeed, in the leaked phone call between Paetongtarn and Hun Sen, she refers to him as "uncle".
However, since the leaked call—which, by all accounts, came intentionally from Hun Sen’s side—the relationship has rapidly deteriorated. Since Pheu Thai retook office in 2023 after nearly a decade of military rule, it has faced immense pressure from both ultra-nationalist military loyalists and the newly formed liberal People’s Party. Many in the military would like nothing more than to see Pheu Thai and the Shinawatra family completely expelled from Thai politics due to their pro-peasant populist policies. The recent military escalation on the border—almost confirmed by Paetongtarn as politically motivated—appears to be an attempt to destabilise Pheu Thai’s fragile coalition majority in parliament.
Similarly, it seems Hun Sen has switched sides, so to speak, abandoning any loyalty to the Shinawatras. In return, nationalist sentiment in Cambodia can be used to assuage mounting issues like currency depreciation, wage stagnation, and growing youth unemployment—while also helping legitimise the leadership transition to his son, Hun Manet.
The current clashes present concerns because of changed military capabilities on both sides. Cambodia has recently acquired new drones and artillery systems, while Thailand has invested in advanced fighter jets and missile technology – notably Saab fighter jets from Sweden. This arms build-up increases the risk that any confrontation could rapidly escalate. Several thousand civilians have reportedly already fled villages near the fighting, with border crossings closed and trade cancelled.
ASEAN has called for restraint but faces challenges mediating between member states with competing territorial claims. The regional body's consensus-based approach makes decisive intervention unlikely unless fighting spreads to other disputed areas along the border.
Historical patterns suggest that the current fighting could follow one of two paths: either a rapid de-escalation as both sides pull back from further confrontation, or a prolonged stalemate that draws in international mediators. With nationalist sentiment running high in both capitals and military establishments wary of appearing weak, the coming days will prove crucial.
At its core, the conflict over Preah Vihear dispute represents more than just a border quarrel - it encapsulates the enduring challenges of post-colonial boundaries, the difficulty of reconciling historical claims with modern realities and the sometimes invisible domestic power struggles that take place in the capitals.
The conflict has already devastated rural communities on both sides. During the 2011 clashes over Preah Vihear temple, over 30,000 Cambodian villagers were forced to flee, many losing crops and livestock that sustained their families. On the Thai side, provinces like Surin saw cross-border trade—normally worth billions annually—plummet by 60% during tensions, starving markets that thousands depend on.
Landmines remain a grim legacy, with uncleared fields, and reportedly new mines, still claiming limbs and lives. Both countries have militarised border zones, forcing rural families into instability, with children’s education and healthcare access often compromised. The politicisation of the dispute has further marginalised these communities, as nationalist rhetoric drowns out their own day-to-day economic and humanitarian struggles. As artillery shells once again fall around the ancient temple, the human and political costs of this conflict continue to mount.
---
This article was produced by Globetrotter. Kay Young is a writer and editor at DinDeng journal (Thailand). He has a forthcoming book on Thai revolutionary history with LeftWord Books (India)

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Was Netaji forced to alter face, die in obscurity in USSR in 1975? Was he so meek?

  By Rajiv Shah   This should sound almost hilarious. Not only did Subhas Chandra Bose not die in a plane crash in Taipei, nor was he the mysterious Gumnami Baba who reportedly passed away on 16 September 1985 in Ayodhya, but we are now told that he actually died in 1975—date unknown—“in oblivion” somewhere in the former Soviet Union. Which city? Moscow? No one seems to know.

Love letters in a lifelong war: Babusha Kohli’s resistance in verse

By Ravi Ranjan*  “War does not determine who is right—only who is left.” Bertrand Russell’s words echo hauntingly in our times, and few contemporary Hindi poets embody this truth as profoundly as Babusha Kohli. Emerging from Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, Kohli has carved a unique space in literature by weaving together tenderness, protest, and philosophy across poetry, prose, and cinema. Her work is not merely artistic expression—it is resistance, refuge, and a call for peace.

The golden crop: How turmeric is transforming women's lives in tribal India

By Vikas Meshram*   When the lush green fields of turmeric sway in the tribal belt of southern Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, and Gujarat, it is not merely a spice crop — it is the golden glow of self-reliance. In villages where even basic spices once had to be bought from the market, the very soil today is yielding a prosperity that has transformed the lives of thousands of families. At the heart of this transformation is the initiative of Vaagdhara, which has linked turmeric with livelihoods, nutrition, and village self-governance — gram swaraj.

Authoritarian destruction of the public sphere in Ecuador: Trumpism in action?

By Pilar Troya Fernández  The situation in Ecuador under Daniel Noboa's government is one of authoritarianism advancing on several fronts simultaneously to consolidate neoliberalism and total submission to the US international agenda. These are not isolated measures, but rather a coordinated strategy that combines job insecurity, the dismantling of the welfare state, unrestricted access to mining, the continuation of oil exploitation without environmental considerations, the centralization of power through the financial suffocation of local governments, and the systematic criminalization of all forms of opposition and popular organization.

Echoes of Vietnam and Chile: The devastating cost of the I-A Axis in Iran

​ By Ram Puniyani  ​The recent joint military actions by Israel and the United States against Iran have been devastating. Like all wars, this conflict is brutal to its core, leaving a trail of human suffering in its wake. The stated pretext for this aggression—the brutality of the Ayatollah Khamenei regime and its nuclear ambitions—clashes sharply with the reality of the diplomatic landscape. Iran had expressed a willingness to remain at the negotiating table, signaling a readiness to concede points emerging from dialogue. 

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

False claim? What Venezuela is witnessing is not surrender but a tactical retreat

By Manolo De Los Santos  The early morning hours of January 3, 2026, marked an inflection point in Venezuela and Latin America’s centuries-long struggle for self-determination and independence. Operation Absolute Resolve, ordered by the Trump administration, constituted the most brutal and direct military assault on a sovereign state in the region in recent memory. In a shocking operation that left hundreds dead, President Nicolás Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores were illegally kidnapped from Venezuelan soil and transported to the United States, where they now face fabricated charges in a New York federal detention facility. In the two months since this act of war, a torrent of speculation has emerged from so-called experts and pundits across the political spectrum. This has followed three main lines: One . The operation’s success indicated treason at the highest levels of the Bolivarian Revolution. Two . Acting President Delcy Rodríguez and the remaining leadership have abandone...

The price of silence: Why Modi won’t follow Shastri, appeal for sacrifice

By Arundhati Dhuru, Sandeep Pandey*  ​In 1965, as India grappled with war and a crippling food crisis, Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri faced a United States that used wheat shipments under the PL-480 agreement as a lever to dictate Indian foreign policy. Shastri’s response remains legendary: he appealed to the nation to skip one meal a day. Millions of middle-class households complied, choosing temporary hunger over the sacrifice of national dignity. Today, India faces a modern equivalent in the energy sector, yet the leadership’s response stands in stark contrast to that era of self-reliance.