Skip to main content

UN experts, USCIRF and Freedom House urge US to designate India as country of particular concern

By A Representative 
A coalition of senior United Nations officials, U.S. human rights bodies, and civil society leaders have called upon the United States government to designate India as a Country of Particular Concern (CPC) for its alleged violations of human rights and religious freedoms. The appeal was made at a Congressional Briefing on Capitol Hill, attended by over 100 congressional staffers.
Key speakers included Nicolas Levrat, UN Special Rapporteur on Minority Issues; Ed O’Donovan, Senior Adviser to the UN Special Rapporteur on Human Rights Defenders; Dr. Asif Mahmood, Vice Chair of the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF); Freedom House President Annie Boyajian; and Ria Chakrabarty, Senior Policy Director at Hindus for Human Rights.
Professor Levrat charged that India, despite its democratic claims, is “failing to protect the most fundamental human rights of millions of its citizens,” particularly minorities. He accused the Indian government of actively fostering insecurity among religious minorities, resulting in violence and systemic discrimination. Levrat highlighted a 2024 letter sent by three UN Special Rapporteurs to the Indian government over hate speech by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, noting that the government never responded.
Freedom House President Annie Boyajian noted a decade-long decline in India’s freedom score, citing the erosion of civil liberties, targeting of political opposition, and rise in religious persecution. “India has lost 15 points in our global freedom index since 2014,” she said, adding that India is the only democracy documented to have engaged in transnational repression, including attempts to target dissidents abroad.
Boyajian called for legal reforms, including repealing anti-conversion laws and strengthening protections for religious minorities. She also urged the U.S. State Department to impose sanctions and designate India as a CPC.
UN adviser Ed O’Donovan condemned what he called the “wanton cruelty” against human rights defenders in India. He pointed to the misuse of counter-terrorism laws, judicial harassment, arbitrary detentions, and suppression of NGOs through the revocation of FCRA licenses. O’Donovan cited the continued detention of activists such as Khurram Parvez and Irfan Meraj under the UAPA and noted that India has received the third-highest number of allegations from the UN Human Rights Defenders mandate since 2020 — responding to only 20% of them.
In a pre-recorded statement, Dr. Asif Mahmood of USCIRF emphasized that his commission has recommended India’s designation as a CPC since 2020, most recently in its 2025 report. He called for targeted sanctions against Indian individuals and agencies, including the Research and Analysis Wing (RAW), in connection with alleged transnational repression incidents.
Ria Chakrabarty of Hindus for Human Rights sharply criticized the Modi government’s consolidation of power and its authoritarian trajectory. “From majoritarianism to oligarchy to anti-democratic governance, Modi has used every tool in the authoritarian playbook to crush the spirit of Indian democracy,” she said, adding that only a popular pushback can reclaim democratic space.
The briefing was cosponsored by multiple organizations including the Indian American Muslim Council, Genocide Watch, Hindus for Human Rights, World Against Genocide, New York State Council of Churches, American Muslim Institution, and The Humanism Project (Australia), among others.

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Was Netaji forced to alter face, die in obscurity in USSR in 1975? Was he so meek?

  By Rajiv Shah   This should sound almost hilarious. Not only did Subhas Chandra Bose not die in a plane crash in Taipei, nor was he the mysterious Gumnami Baba who reportedly passed away on 16 September 1985 in Ayodhya, but we are now told that he actually died in 1975—date unknown—“in oblivion” somewhere in the former Soviet Union. Which city? Moscow? No one seems to know.

Love letters in a lifelong war: Babusha Kohli’s resistance in verse

By Ravi Ranjan*  “War does not determine who is right—only who is left.” Bertrand Russell’s words echo hauntingly in our times, and few contemporary Hindi poets embody this truth as profoundly as Babusha Kohli. Emerging from Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, Kohli has carved a unique space in literature by weaving together tenderness, protest, and philosophy across poetry, prose, and cinema. Her work is not merely artistic expression—it is resistance, refuge, and a call for peace.

The golden crop: How turmeric is transforming women's lives in tribal India

By Vikas Meshram*   When the lush green fields of turmeric sway in the tribal belt of southern Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, and Gujarat, it is not merely a spice crop — it is the golden glow of self-reliance. In villages where even basic spices once had to be bought from the market, the very soil today is yielding a prosperity that has transformed the lives of thousands of families. At the heart of this transformation is the initiative of Vaagdhara, which has linked turmeric with livelihoods, nutrition, and village self-governance — gram swaraj.

Authoritarian destruction of the public sphere in Ecuador: Trumpism in action?

By Pilar Troya Fernández  The situation in Ecuador under Daniel Noboa's government is one of authoritarianism advancing on several fronts simultaneously to consolidate neoliberalism and total submission to the US international agenda. These are not isolated measures, but rather a coordinated strategy that combines job insecurity, the dismantling of the welfare state, unrestricted access to mining, the continuation of oil exploitation without environmental considerations, the centralization of power through the financial suffocation of local governments, and the systematic criminalization of all forms of opposition and popular organization.

Echoes of Vietnam and Chile: The devastating cost of the I-A Axis in Iran

​ By Ram Puniyani  ​The recent joint military actions by Israel and the United States against Iran have been devastating. Like all wars, this conflict is brutal to its core, leaving a trail of human suffering in its wake. The stated pretext for this aggression—the brutality of the Ayatollah Khamenei regime and its nuclear ambitions—clashes sharply with the reality of the diplomatic landscape. Iran had expressed a willingness to remain at the negotiating table, signaling a readiness to concede points emerging from dialogue. 

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

The price of silence: Why Modi won’t follow Shastri, appeal for sacrifice

By Arundhati Dhuru, Sandeep Pandey*  ​In 1965, as India grappled with war and a crippling food crisis, Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri faced a United States that used wheat shipments under the PL-480 agreement as a lever to dictate Indian foreign policy. Shastri’s response remains legendary: he appealed to the nation to skip one meal a day. Millions of middle-class households complied, choosing temporary hunger over the sacrifice of national dignity. Today, India faces a modern equivalent in the energy sector, yet the leadership’s response stands in stark contrast to that era of self-reliance.

False claim? What Venezuela is witnessing is not surrender but a tactical retreat

By Manolo De Los Santos  The early morning hours of January 3, 2026, marked an inflection point in Venezuela and Latin America’s centuries-long struggle for self-determination and independence. Operation Absolute Resolve, ordered by the Trump administration, constituted the most brutal and direct military assault on a sovereign state in the region in recent memory. In a shocking operation that left hundreds dead, President Nicolás Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores were illegally kidnapped from Venezuelan soil and transported to the United States, where they now face fabricated charges in a New York federal detention facility. In the two months since this act of war, a torrent of speculation has emerged from so-called experts and pundits across the political spectrum. This has followed three main lines: One . The operation’s success indicated treason at the highest levels of the Bolivarian Revolution. Two . Acting President Delcy Rodríguez and the remaining leadership have abandone...