Skip to main content

Citizens and experts warn against aadhaar-voter ID linkage, call it threat to democracy

By A Representative 
Over 150 concerned citizens, academics, former bureaucrats, lawyers, journalists, and activists have strongly opposed the move to link Aadhaar with voter IDs, calling it a grave threat to electoral integrity, democratic participation, and fundamental rights. In a statement endorsed by groups including Rethink Aadhaar, Article 21 Trust, Jan Hastakshep, and individuals like economists Jayati Ghosh, Reetika Khera, and former chief secretary Sharad Behar, the signatories denounced what they describe as the government's coercive push to make Aadhaar submission effectively mandatory for voters.
The controversy stems from the Election Commission of India’s recent directive requiring those who decline to link their Aadhaar with their voter ID to justify their decision in person before the Electoral Registration Officer. Critics argue that this violates the ECI’s 2023 commitment before the Supreme Court that such linkage would be voluntary. The signatories assert that the right to vote must not be contingent upon submission of biometric data or the Aadhaar number, especially when the UIDAI itself does not verify nationality and Aadhaar is given to anyone residing in India for 182 days.
The statement expresses particular concern over the ongoing Special Intensive Revision process ahead of the Bihar elections, warning that inadequate notice and procedural safeguards could disenfranchise vulnerable voters. It highlights previous mass deletions—such as in the 2018 Telangana elections, where over 55 lakh voters were reportedly deleted due to Aadhaar mismatches—as evidence of the systemic exclusion such linkages cause. The failed NERPAP initiative in 2015 is cited as another example of Aadhaar-voter linkage being tried and rejected.
Criticism also centers on the technical and legal flaws of the Aadhaar database. The Comptroller and Auditor General’s 2022 report exposed severe issues such as duplicate and fraudulent Aadhaar numbers, unreliable biometric verification, and lack of nationality confirmation. The statement points out that Aadhaar data is more error-prone than voter IDs, with the risk of wrongful deletions now looming over electoral rolls just as it has plagued welfare schemes like PDS and MGNREGA.
Moreover, the proposal is seen as enabling mass surveillance and political profiling without the protection of a functional data privacy law. The Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023, remains largely unimplemented and, according to the signatories, offers wide-ranging exemptions to the government, increasing the risk of data misuse. The Madras High Court has already raised alarms about the abuse of Aadhaar data in electoral contexts, such as in Puducherry.
Calling the proposal unconstitutional, the signatories argue that it contravenes the Supreme Court’s 2018 judgment in Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India, which limited Aadhaar’s use to welfare schemes funded through the Consolidated Fund of India. Making voting contingent upon Aadhaar, they claim, undermines citizens’ rights to privacy, equality, and democratic participation.
The statement urges the Election Commission to immediately withdraw the Aadhaar-voter ID linkage proposal. It demands a revision of Form 6B to ensure an explicit, meaningful opt-out choice; reinstatement of robust, door-to-door verification methods; social audits to strengthen voter roll transparency; and the adoption of non-biometric alternatives for identity verification.
“The right to vote is not a privilege granted by the state,” the statement declares. “It is a right that must be protected from coercion, surveillance, and exclusion.” The signatories insist that the Election Commission must fulfill its constitutional obligation to protect electoral rights and not erode them under administrative pressure or technological compulsion.
The statement has been endorsed by a wide cross-section of Indian society including activists, researchers, teachers, retired officials, and citizens from across the country and abroad.

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Hoping against despair after Myanmar President’s visit to India

By Nava Thakuria  Myanmar President U Min Aung Hlaing’s five-day official visit to India from 30 May to 3 June 2026 drew attention both in New Delhi and in India’s northeastern region, where policymakers and residents closely follow developments in the neighbouring country. The visit was significant because it touched on several issues of mutual concern, including security cooperation, border management, connectivity projects, trade, and regional stability.

Beyond data: The economist who refused to remain in the ivory tower

By Vikas Meshram   There are few people who are born into privilege yet choose to dedicate their lives to the cause of the poor. Jean Drèze is one such individual. Born on January 22, 1959, in Leuven, Belgium, into the family of a distinguished economist, Drèze has become one of the most influential voices in the study of poverty, inequality, and social policy in India. Having lived in India since 1979, he adopted Indian citizenship in 2002 and has since played a pivotal role in shaping some of the country's most important welfare initiatives.