Skip to main content

NACEJ raises strong objections to MoEF&CC notifications exempting industries from environmental clearances

By A Representative 
The National Alliance for Climate and Ecological Justice (NACEJ), a pan-Indian initiative of the National Alliance of People's Movements (NAPM), has submitted a strongly-worded letter to Ved Prakash Mishra, Joint Secretary of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEF&CC), objecting to recent notifications that exempt industries from obtaining Consent to Establish (CTE) and Consent to Operate (CTO). The letter, signed by over 50 environmental activists, researchers, and organizations, demands the immediate withdrawal of the notifications, citing severe legal, environmental, and social concerns.
The notifications, G.S.R 702(E) and G.S.R 703(E), issued on 12th November 2024, exempt industries with Environmental Clearances and 39 so-called "White Industries" from obtaining CTE and CTO under the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, and the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981. NACEJ has criticized these exemptions as a blatant prioritization of 'ease of doing business' over environmental protection, public health, and the rights of communities.
NACEJ has raised several critical objections to the notifications. The exemptions undermine the foundational objectives of the Air and Water Acts, which were enacted to protect public health and ensure environmental sustainability. The removal of consent requirements weakens critical pollution control measures and ignores local environmental challenges. The State Pollution Control Boards (SPCBs), which are responsible for monitoring industrial compliance, have been sidelined, creating a regulatory vacuum that allows industries to operate with minimal oversight and accountability.
The classification of 39 industries, including Fly Ash Bricks/Block Manufacturing, as "White Industries" is deemed unscientific and arbitrary. Fly ash, a byproduct of coal combustion, contains toxic heavy metals like arsenic, lead, and mercury, posing significant health and environmental risks. Exempting these industries from environmental scrutiny is dangerous and unjustifiable. The notifications bypass the legislative process required to amend the Air and Water Acts, rendering them potentially unconstitutional. Such executive overreach violates the principles of federalism and democratic governance. Additionally, the notifications were issued without any public consultation or engagement with affected communities, experts, or civil society organizations, violating the Pre-Legislative Consultation Policy (2014) and democratic norms.
NACEJ warns that these exemptions will exacerbate India's climate crisis and undermine its commitments under the Paris Agreement. The increased industrial activity facilitated by the notifications will lead to higher greenhouse gas emissions, hindering India's ability to meet its Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs).
NACEJ has called for the immediate withdrawal of the notifications G.S.R 702(E) and G.S.R 703(E). They have also demanded a detailed study on the environmental, social, and economic impacts of exempting the 39 industries, which should be made publicly available and subject to public scrutiny. The alliance has emphasized the need to uphold the statutory role of SPCBs in monitoring industrial compliance and to refrain from making arbitrary amendments to the Air and Water Acts.
The letter is endorsed by prominent environmental activists and organizations, including Medha Patkar (Narmada Bachao Andolan), Soumya Dutta (MAUSAM), Himanshu Thakkar (SANDRP), and representatives from Climate Front India, Fridays for Future India, and various regional movements.
NACEJ's letter underscores the urgent need for the MoEF&CC to prioritize environmental protection and public health over industrial interests. The alliance has urged the Ministry to take corrective action and uphold India's environmental laws and commitments to climate justice.

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Hoping against despair after Myanmar President’s visit to India

By Nava Thakuria  Myanmar President U Min Aung Hlaing’s five-day official visit to India from 30 May to 3 June 2026 drew attention both in New Delhi and in India’s northeastern region, where policymakers and residents closely follow developments in the neighbouring country. The visit was significant because it touched on several issues of mutual concern, including security cooperation, border management, connectivity projects, trade, and regional stability.

Beyond data: The economist who refused to remain in the ivory tower

By Vikas Meshram   There are few people who are born into privilege yet choose to dedicate their lives to the cause of the poor. Jean Drèze is one such individual. Born on January 22, 1959, in Leuven, Belgium, into the family of a distinguished economist, Drèze has become one of the most influential voices in the study of poverty, inequality, and social policy in India. Having lived in India since 1979, he adopted Indian citizenship in 2002 and has since played a pivotal role in shaping some of the country's most important welfare initiatives.