Skip to main content

Indian villages near the Bangladesh border face severe deprivation and rights violations

By A Representative 
Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Mancha (MASUM) has petitioned the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) regarding the dire situation in India Para and Nawdapara villages, located within Bagda block along the India-Bangladesh border in North 24 Parganas district.  These villages, home to Muslim OBC and Hindu Scheduled Caste families, are virtually surrounded by Bangladesh territory, a consequence of the 1947 partition.
A recent survey conducted by MASUM reveals a severe lack of basic amenities and fundamental rights violations.  The villages suffer from a lack of proper roads (with only one recently constructed road in Nawdapara following MASUM’s intervention), no primary schools, and no healthcare facilities.  Electricity connections are limited to residents living outside a temporary fencing erected by the Border Security Force (BSF), and even those residents face restrictions on their movement within India.
MASUM alleges that the BSF’s “B” Company of Battalion No. 68 effectively controls the civic life of these villages.  The organization claims that the BSF's arbitrary placement of temporary fencing, instead of proper border demarcation as per law, puts the villagers and their property at risk.  The BSF’s restrictions on movement severely limit the villagers' ability to access essential services and exercise their constitutional rights.
Residents of Nawdapara, primarily dependent on jute and banana cultivation, face frequent interference from the BSF, disrupting their livelihoods and forcing some into smuggling activities as a desperate means of survival.  In India Para, a village of 15 Muslim OBC families, the situation is even more dire.  With no roads or electricity, the village is virtually cut off from mainstream India. Residents rely on Bangladesh for basic necessities, including medical care, due to BSF restrictions on accessing Indian facilities.
MASUM’s petition highlights several constitutional and legal violations, including infringements on the right to free movement, right to life and personal liberty, right to equality, and denial of basic civic amenities. The organization also points to potential violations of the Electricity Act, 2003, the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNS), 2023, and the Scheduled Castes and The Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
MASUM has demanded that the government and relevant authorities take immediate action, including relocating BSF posts to the international border, lifting restrictions on villagers' movement, constructing proper roads, providing electricity and basic amenities, establishing schools and healthcare centers, and ensuring villagers can pursue their livelihoods without interference.  They are also demanding an investigation into the BSF’s actions and accountability for any wrongdoing.  MASUM urges the government to protect the constitutional rights of the residents and ensure their integration into mainstream Indian society.

Comments

TRENDING

Manufacturing, services: India's low-skill, middle-skill labour remains underemployed

By Francis Kuriakose* The Indian economy was in a state of deceleration well before Covid-19 made its impact in early 2020. This can be inferred from the declining trends of four important macroeconomic variables that indicate the health of the economy in the last quarter of 2019.

The soundtrack of resistance: How 'Sada Sada Ya Nabi' is fueling the Iran war

​ By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  ​The Persian track “ Sada Sada Ya Nabi ye ” by Hossein Sotoodeh has taken the world by storm. This viral media has cut across linguistic barriers to achieve cult status, reaching over 10 million views. The electrifying music and passionate rendition by the Iranian singer have resonated across the globe, particularly as the high-intensity military conflict involving Iran entered its second month in March 2026.

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”