Professor Manoranjan Mohanty has been a dedicated advocate for human rights over five decades. His work as a scholar and activist has supported revolutionary democratic movements, navigating complex areas of the Indian socio-political landscape. His balanced, non-partisan approach to human rights and social justice has made his books essential resources for advocates of democracy.
Professor Mohanty has participated in numerous fact-finding missions in areas impacted by state repression, lending guidance to the People's Union for Democratic Rights in Delhi. Unlike many intellectuals, he has engaged directly with grassroots movements, often integrating his work with the causes of resistance. He continues to be a voice for revolutionary democratic resistance, particularly in the face of rising authoritarianism, and his presence in public gatherings is valued for his approachable and empathetic nature.
In the 1970s, Mohanty advocated for revolutionary change, emphasizing the role of Mao Zedong’s ideas in liberation movements and analyzing China’s experiments under Mao as distinct from earlier socialist approaches. While a Marxist, he has also supported a multi-party state and critiqued the hierarchical structures in Stalin’s era. He praised Jayaprakash Narayan’s role in preserving democracy during the 1970s, finding merit in the movement’s opposition to authoritarianism and corruption.
Five Decades of the Maoist Movement
In his book "Five Decades of the Maoist Movement in India", Mohanty examines the movement's evolution, from its origins to its current structure as represented by the CPI (Maoist). The book provides an in-depth analysis of early peasant uprisings in Naxalbari and Srikakulam through a theoretical framework, comparing them with the Chinese Revolution. Mohanty discusses the organizational developments of the CPI (Maoist) in the face of challenges like state bans and leader losses, as well as the movement’s expansion through issues of displacement and civil rights.
Mohanty divides India’s Communist revolutionary movement into three main streams—the CPI(ML), CPI(Maoist), and CPI(ML) Liberation—each with distinct strategies for revolution and views on electoral politics. His analysis highlights strategic differences within the Naxalite movement and how the CPI (Maoist) has consolidated support by addressing issues like adivasi displacement and civil liberties violations. He argues that the state’s response to the Maoist movement cannot succeed without addressing the underlying issues driving it.
The book also covers the legacy of the Naxalite movement over five decades and the theoretical challenges it faces, such as refining the strategy of democratic revolution within India’s complex political environment.
China and Mao Zedong Thought
Mohanty’s book "China’s Transformation: The Success Story and the Success Trap" examines the positive and negative impacts of China’s reforms since Mao, focusing on the balance between economic growth and social issues. His Study of the Political Philosophy of Mao Zedong explores Mao's ideas on revolutionary transformation, particularly in Asian, African, and Latin American contexts, as well as Mao's strategic principles for building a united front against primary adversaries.
In "Ideology Matters: China from Mao Zedong to Xi Jinping", Mohanty investigates China's ideological shifts from Mao to Xi, analyzing the successes and challenges China faces in maintaining its reform agenda.
Criticisms
While Mohanty provides a comprehensive view, he has been critiqued for not distinctly emphasizing the CPI (Maoist) as the sole group actively pursuing a revolutionary path. Critics suggest he may equate the CPI(ML) Liberation with more revolutionary groups despite its closer alignment with parliamentary politics. He is also seen as downplaying the contributions of the pro-Mao "Gang of Four" during China’s Cultural Revolution and failing to recognize their genuine revolutionary intent.
In summary, Professor Mohanty’s work stands as a significant contribution to the study of revolutionary democracy, human rights, and the legacy of Maoist thought, even as it sparks debates about the nuances of revolutionary paths and historical analysis.
---
*Freelance journalist
Comments