Skip to main content

Vishwanath has been unfairly excluded from global list of 100 best cricketers

By Harsh Thakor 

Gundappa Vishwanath scaled zones in batting artistry or wizardry unparalleled amongst Indian batsmen. The best of his batting was a manifestation of the divine. He was also the epitome of cricketing sportsmanship. Sadly 40 years ago he unceremoniously bid farewell to the International cricket world, after the concluding test at Karachi in 1982-83., in January end.
Very hard to visualise a character like Vishwanath being reborn today His memories are embedded in cricket lovers today when sportsmanship and grace have virtually been relegated to oblivion with the game of cricket turned into a commercial commodity. Today agro and unsporting behaviour is a routine feature Vishy shimmered cricket’s spirituality. His behaviour on the cricket field was grace personified, No one in his age defined cricket more as a gentleman’s game, than Vishy.
Vishwanath could execute strokes that were surreal with his steel wrists. His strokeplay resembled the touches of a painter’s brush, literally composing or painting an innings. His repertoires of strokes in an innings were like the colours of a rainbow and gave vibrations of a lotus blooming Vishy transcended regions unexplored in the art of batting and commanded a cricket ball in the manner of a conductor leading a symphony. Technically Vishy was very correct possessing most rhythmic footwork and immaculate defence. The best innings of Vishwanath were like classical monuments sculpted. He treated the cricket ball like a child. Even when executing a defensive stroke, he was a joy to behold. There was hardly an adjective that could do justice to the purity of Vishy’s strokes.
I never ever saw a batsman execute a square or late cut shot with such remorseless ease .Vishy ‘s repertoire included a stroke that was a medley of a flick, pull and hook combined, which no one else executed. Vishwanath took touch art to heights s rarely ever climbed. With the deftest of touches Vishwanath could bisect the most impregnable fields. Vishy also could execute the most exquisite drives, particularly through the covers.
Although he served as a coach after retirement unfortunately he also became an alcoholic in his later life. I feel his reign as an Indian test cricketer was curtailed abruptly, never being called back by selectors after being dropped in 1983.His improvisation would have come in very handy in ODI cricket.

Batting Career

In his very debut at Kanpur in 1969-70 he scored a scintillating 137 against Australia giving a most illustrative indication of his supreme cricketing gift. Above all it was executed in a crisis, which was predominant feature of Vishy’s entire career.
Vishy played an important hand in India’s first test win at the Oval in 1971 scoring an immaculate 33 in a run chase.
He compiled a classical 113 at Brabourne stadium against England in 1972-73.
In England in 1974 he gave glimpses of his talent with some sparkling batting in losing causes at Manchester and Lords, in overcast conditions.
It was against West Indies in 1974-75 at home that Vishwanath gave his career’s most glittering performance when scoring 568 run sat an average of 56.8.Vishy’s batting resurrected India like a phoenix from the Ashes, after being 2-0 down to levelling the series at 2-2 with his classic 139 at Kolkata and unbeaten 97 at Madras. He cut, drove and hooked the great West Indian fast bowler Andy Roberts with an assurance few ever did. His knock at Madras was rated by Wisden as the 6th best test innings ever at that time.Vishy blended the imagination of a musical composer with the skill of a surgeon, bisecting the most impregnable gaps. In that knock cricketing skill or wizardry reached heights rarely transcended. I have rarely ever seen such a batsman single-handedly launching a counter attack against sustained pace on a fast track.
In 1975-76 in West Indies Vishwanath was one of the architects of India achieving the highest then 4th innings total to win a game at Trinidad .Hs 112 paved the path or to launch a historic resurrection from dire straits.. After Gavaskar had laid the base scoring 102 Vishy wrote the next chapter in an epic, taking the bowling attack by the sword. One can never forget how he would rise up on his toes to dispatch short balls against the Express pace bowler Michael Holding. Though he was run out but he made an Indian win mere formality then. Sadly in the decider at Kingston he fell victim to intimidatory bowling, failing in using his genius to come to the party by unleashing a counter attack.
In 1975-76 at Dunedin versus New Zealand Vishy scored 79 and 78 in conditions where the ball was moving all around the place., on a green top. Facing the likes of Richard Hadlee he resembled a surgeon performing an operation on patient considered incurable. With great judgment he left deliveries, displaying exemplary judgement in negotiating the moving ball. Sunil Gavaskar described it as the best batting he ever saw against a moving ball.
At Kanpur in 1976-77 he conquered the great Richard Hadlee like few batsman ever did, playing in bad light. His unbeaten 103 was an exhibition of batting mastery at it’s highest zenith, blending every component for a perfect innings. Domination was revealed in areas of the sublime.
On the 1977-78 tour of Australia Vishwanath did not score a century but still was the most prolific batsman, with an aggregate of 473 runs.,and averaging a remarkable 55.He scored five fifties in succession which played major role in India making a spectacular resurrection to square the series after being 2-0 down. On fast tracks he demonstrated his prowess against pace when taking apart Jeff Thomson.
In Pakistan he scored 145 at Faisalabad to become the 1st Indian batsman to score a century against every test playing nation. However he was inconsistent for the rest of the series apart from a fine 83 at Karachi.
At home in 1978-79 against West Indies Vishy’s 124 at Madras in the fourth test, on one of the fastest pitches ever won India the series. India were ressurected from the dark woods in spectacular counterattack by Vishy to enable India to reach 255 in the 1st innings .Significantly the great Sunil Gavaskar had scores of 0 and 4... He went on to score 179 at Kanpur in the fifth, his then highest score.
In the 1979 Prudential world Cup Vishy scored a scintillating 75 out of a score of 190 against West Indies, the greatest pace bowling attack ever, playing them better than perhaps any batsman ever did . Skipper Clive Lloyd classed it close to the best knock ever against his team’s pace attack. One of the most breathtaking exhibitions of domination of express pace.
He was a model of consistency in England in 1979. At Edgbaston when India were given a humiliating innings defeat ,Vishy scored 78 and 50.At Lords Vishy played a counter attacking role in enabling India to draw the test at Lords after India was 310 run s behind in the 1st innings. A 210 run stand with Dilip Vengsarkar lifted India from the depths of despair. Ironically Vengsarkar thanked Vishy for the great encouragement he received for scoring his 1st century at Lords. I can’t forget Vishwanath so often boosting his partner .Sadly a dubious umpiring decision being given out of a bump ball in the 4th test at the Oval, robbed Vishy of giving the finishing touches to a glorious Indian victory, with India falling 9 runs adrift of a record 438 run target.
Very successful with a record aggregate of 521 runs and average of over 73 versus Australia in 1979 at home. However he completely lost form against Pakistan in 1979-80 although India was triumphant.
In 1980 in the Jubilee test at Mumbai against England Vishwanath recalled Bob Taylor when he was wrongly adjudged caught behind, with England precariously placed at 85-6.It possibly cost India the game but took sportsmanship to scales rarely touched in cricket, and won a victory for cricket as a whole.
In 1980-81 he compiled an epic 114 out of a total of 237 at Melbourne. This knock virtually took India out of the doldrums to stage one of cricket’s most sensational turn arounds to win a test and draw a rubber on Australian soil for the first time. The memories of his strokes on this day are always embedded in my memories .His late cutting of a Dennis Lillee Yorker to the fence was touch art at scale almost unparalleled..Vishy was the architect of a miraculous Indian win .Ironically Vishy was on the verge of being dropped, after undergoing a loss of form.
In 1981-92 in a home series against England he made a spectacular comeback when scoring 107 in the 3rd test at Delhi. English captain Keith Fletcher ranked it amongst the best innings ever saw. India were in dire straits before Vishy did the repair job, after being on the threshold of being dropped .At Madras in the fifth test he compiled his highest ever score of 222, participating in a 281 run stand with Yashpal Sharma. It was a sheer masterpiece, being the then highest score by an Indian batsman against England, scored in 638 minutes, with 31 boundaries.
In England in 1981-82 Vishy gave glimpses of his endowed talent when scoring 3 successive match-saving fifties at Old Trafford and Oval. His knocks procured draws for India, from precarious positions. He inspired youngsters like Ravi Shastri, in the middle.
Sadly Vishy the 1982-83 tour of Pakistan, consistently fell prey to the fiery pace and guile of Imran Khan. I don’t have words to express how sorry I felt he was dropped for West Indies tour of 1983, subsequently .Thus the saga of his career ended in Pakistan. It was most unceremonious ending for Vishy’s test career.

Evaluation of Vishwanath

Had he done complete justice to his great talent, Vishwanath could have joined the club of all-time greats like Sachin Tendulkar or Viv Richards. A test record of 14 centuries, and 6080 runs at an average of 41.93 in 93 tests and 151 innings is outstanding, but still not in the league of the all-time great batsmen. At home he averaged 47.32 aggregating 3502 runs while disappointingly overseas he averaged 36.30, aggregating 2578 runs In 1st class cricket he amassed 17970 runs at an average of 40.93 with 44 centuries. Lack of temperament and consistency led to his undoing. He was equally at home on the fastest Australian wickets, to the seaming English conditions and the turning pitches on the subcontinent. Failure in his final series against Sri Lanka and Pakistan made his very healthy average of 45+dip to below 42.
Arguably he was a better batsman on bad wickets than Sachin Tendulkar or Sunil Gavaskar .The great West Indian paceman Andy Roberts and Australian fast bowler Dennis Lillee rated Vishy a better batsman than Gavaskar, on fast or bouncy wickets. Syed Kirmani and Sandeep Patil classed Vishy as the most perfect batsmen they ever saw.
It is significant that Vishwanath averaged 49, which is 6 more runs than Gavaskar did in test matches won and India never lost a game when he scored a century. At his best he shaped wins or turned them more than his brother-in-law, Sunil Gavaskar.
Vishwanath was most unselfish and never played for personal records or milestones. In that light Rahul Dravid in recent times was very similar. I can never forget the innumerable occasions Vishwanath rescued India from dire straits. It is worth referring to Anantha Narayana’s statistical research in cricinfo on the true worth of Vishwanath’s scores to India.
Vishy’s 50+ averages against West Indies and Australia spoke for itself. Notable that 8 of his 14 centuries were scored against West Indies and Australia.
Arguably in the 1970’s Vishwanath may have made the world test xi at his best, competing for a place with Zaheer Abbas. In my view they were the 2 most stylish Asian batsmen ever. Even a whisker did not separate the merits of these two batsmen.Zaheer was the better batsman on slow wickets and against spin. Vishy was the better player on bouncy tracks and pace.
It is not for nothing that the great Sunil Gavaskar ranks Vishwanath as the best batsman of his time and even a better player than him. Ironically like Gavaskar,Vishy faced the best pace bowling without the aid of a helmet.
In my view for pure batting grace or style I would rank Vishwanath alongside Denis Compton, Ranjitsinghji, Frank Worrell, David Gower and Zaheer Abbas . In terms of elegance amongst Indian batsmen only ML Jaisimha ,Mohammad Azharrudin and VVS Laxman ,were in the same league as Vishy.
Amongst Indian batsman in test cricket in my opinion, only Tendulkar,Gavaskar, Kohli ,Sehwag Dravid would rank ahead of Vishwanath.
For sheer natural talent he arguably stood only behind Sachin Tendulkar,amongst Asian giants and amongst the dozen most gifted batsmen ever.
In facing genuine fast bowling I rate Vishwanath the best ever Asian batsmen with Majid Khan and Inzamam Ul Haq.
On bad wickets in my view, with Majid Khan and Ian Chappell, Viishy was the best batsmen of the 1970’s.
I can’t recall more than 5 batsmen better than Vishwanath in blending style with correct technique in cricket history.
It is my deepest regret that Vishwanath did not play in Kerry Packer World series cricket, where he would have pitted against the very best in the world.
The cricketing world also missed a Vishwanath facing the left arm pace bowling maestro Wasim Akram, which would have been cricket’s most spectacular contests.
After his retirement it was Mohammad Azharuddin and later V.V.SLaxman who carried on where Vishwanath left, in terms of batting beauty.
I feel Vishwanath has been unfairly excluded from the list of 100 best cricketers by Cristopher Martin Jenkins,John Woodcock and Geoff Armstrong. Even if does not rank with a Viv Richards or Tendulkar Vishwanath stands on par with stalwarts like Ted Dexter ,MartinCrowe or David Gower.
Unlike Rahul Dravid,Vishwanath lacked temperament and consistency or as much concentration. In many ways his style and approach to batting was a complete dichotomy of partner Sunil Gavaskar. Throwing away his wicket or carefree batting was a trademark of Vishy’s career.
In my personal view weighing all the pros and cons I would place the tag of ‘truly great’ on Vishwanath.
I recommend all readers to read the essay by Rajgopal Nidamboor on Vishwanath in ‘cricket Bouleverard’ who describes Vishwanath as an equivalent of a Rembrandt to batting, crediting him with giving bating art a new dimension. Also suggest writing by Vijay Lokapally in scoreline, Rajan Bala, Ramchandra Guha and Partab Ramchand , the interviews of Anshuman Gaekwad and Krishnamchari Shrikanth and the view s Dennis Lillee, Andy Roberts , Gavaskar,R avi Shastri ,Syed Kirmani and Sandeep Patil.
---
Harsh Thakor is a freelance journalist and a keen student of cricket history

Comments

Unknown said…
I have often wondered why much was never written about this classical master .
Unknown said…
His exclusion and inclusion of ordinary players has made the list quite ordinary. Gandapa Vishwanath was one of the top players of his time and a most dependable member of squad comprising of stalwarts like Gasvaskar, Vangsarkar, mohindar amarnath, chetan chuhan, kapil dev etc. He was a brilliant stroke players and a treat to watch. His exclusion raises serious doubts on the impartiality and capability of writer. Such players could have been an obvious peak. I am surprised and disappointed.
indravikramsingh.blogspot.in said…
This is a fair assessment of Visvanath, the artist with the willow, his handling of pace bowling with rare finesse and courage, and his Old World sportsmanship. To rank him among the top 100 cricketers or not, is a matter of personal opinion and very subjective. There have been so many superb players. How does one rank them, what parameters does one use, unless one is talking about a Bradman or a Sobers? Visvanath's wristy elegance is the stuff of folklore. To rack up an average of 50, often the yardstick to rate a batsman as great, one has to pile up big scores, apart from consistency. Stylish 60s or 70s are not enough, and I think that is where Visvanath was found wanting. He was certainly a batsman from the top drawer worth going miles to see.
Kshitij D said…
Wonderful write up!

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Was Netaji forced to alter face, die in obscurity in USSR in 1975? Was he so meek?

  By Rajiv Shah   This should sound almost hilarious. Not only did Subhas Chandra Bose not die in a plane crash in Taipei, nor was he the mysterious Gumnami Baba who reportedly passed away on 16 September 1985 in Ayodhya, but we are now told that he actually died in 1975—date unknown—“in oblivion” somewhere in the former Soviet Union. Which city? Moscow? No one seems to know.

Love letters in a lifelong war: Babusha Kohli’s resistance in verse

By Ravi Ranjan*  “War does not determine who is right—only who is left.” Bertrand Russell’s words echo hauntingly in our times, and few contemporary Hindi poets embody this truth as profoundly as Babusha Kohli. Emerging from Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, Kohli has carved a unique space in literature by weaving together tenderness, protest, and philosophy across poetry, prose, and cinema. Her work is not merely artistic expression—it is resistance, refuge, and a call for peace.

The golden crop: How turmeric is transforming women's lives in tribal India

By Vikas Meshram*   When the lush green fields of turmeric sway in the tribal belt of southern Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, and Gujarat, it is not merely a spice crop — it is the golden glow of self-reliance. In villages where even basic spices once had to be bought from the market, the very soil today is yielding a prosperity that has transformed the lives of thousands of families. At the heart of this transformation is the initiative of Vaagdhara, which has linked turmeric with livelihoods, nutrition, and village self-governance — gram swaraj.

Authoritarian destruction of the public sphere in Ecuador: Trumpism in action?

By Pilar Troya Fernández  The situation in Ecuador under Daniel Noboa's government is one of authoritarianism advancing on several fronts simultaneously to consolidate neoliberalism and total submission to the US international agenda. These are not isolated measures, but rather a coordinated strategy that combines job insecurity, the dismantling of the welfare state, unrestricted access to mining, the continuation of oil exploitation without environmental considerations, the centralization of power through the financial suffocation of local governments, and the systematic criminalization of all forms of opposition and popular organization.

Echoes of Vietnam and Chile: The devastating cost of the I-A Axis in Iran

​ By Ram Puniyani  ​The recent joint military actions by Israel and the United States against Iran have been devastating. Like all wars, this conflict is brutal to its core, leaving a trail of human suffering in its wake. The stated pretext for this aggression—the brutality of the Ayatollah Khamenei regime and its nuclear ambitions—clashes sharply with the reality of the diplomatic landscape. Iran had expressed a willingness to remain at the negotiating table, signaling a readiness to concede points emerging from dialogue. 

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

The price of silence: Why Modi won’t follow Shastri, appeal for sacrifice

By Arundhati Dhuru, Sandeep Pandey*  ​In 1965, as India grappled with war and a crippling food crisis, Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri faced a United States that used wheat shipments under the PL-480 agreement as a lever to dictate Indian foreign policy. Shastri’s response remains legendary: he appealed to the nation to skip one meal a day. Millions of middle-class households complied, choosing temporary hunger over the sacrifice of national dignity. Today, India faces a modern equivalent in the energy sector, yet the leadership’s response stands in stark contrast to that era of self-reliance.

False claim? What Venezuela is witnessing is not surrender but a tactical retreat

By Manolo De Los Santos  The early morning hours of January 3, 2026, marked an inflection point in Venezuela and Latin America’s centuries-long struggle for self-determination and independence. Operation Absolute Resolve, ordered by the Trump administration, constituted the most brutal and direct military assault on a sovereign state in the region in recent memory. In a shocking operation that left hundreds dead, President Nicolás Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores were illegally kidnapped from Venezuelan soil and transported to the United States, where they now face fabricated charges in a New York federal detention facility. In the two months since this act of war, a torrent of speculation has emerged from so-called experts and pundits across the political spectrum. This has followed three main lines: One . The operation’s success indicated treason at the highest levels of the Bolivarian Revolution. Two . Acting President Delcy Rodríguez and the remaining leadership have abandone...