Skip to main content

Elites, their leaders creating isolationist frameworks for checking climate change

By Bharat Dogra 

Two most prominently stated facts about climate change are—firstly, it is extremely important to check climate change and secondly, that greenhouse gas emissions must be reduced very significantly at a very fast pace, as scientifically determined. Both of these statements are absolutely correct. However if we confine ourselves just to these statements, then by themselves these can only give us a reductionist and isolationist understanding which, while technically correct, is not very helpful either for resolving this problem or for creating a better and safer world.
There is an urgent need to reformulate the climate change framework, a task to which this writer has devoted much attention and effort in recent times. On the basis of this study and effort I would like to reformulate the basic issue as follows—Climate change is a critical survival issue which should be resolved on the basis of urgency by creating a world based on peace and disarmament, justice and equality, real democracy and social harmony, simplicity (avoiding or reducing luxuries and consumerism) and caring, environment and bio-diversity protection with special emphasis on reducing GHG emissions and fossil fuels.
This reformulation seeks to establish an understanding of climate change which is well integrated with other, wider, equally urgent tasks as without such an integration isolationist efforts to check climate change, as presently exist, cannot progress much on their own limited agenda and strength ( as also evident from their recent record). What is worse, such isolationist efforts based on reductionist understanding distract attention from the real and bigger challenges and in this important context can even be counter-productive for the wider task of creating a better and safer world. The isolationism of present day efforts also carries the high risk of leading them to the blind alley of entering perhaps even more dangerous territories than the problems they are trying to resolve, as isolationist approaches generally depend too much on merely technological solutions while neglecting those related to social consciousness and creativity.
Climate change (as also several other serious environmental problems and increasing disasters) is a way of nature telling humanity and more particularly its leaders that the current management of earth affairs and elite life patterns are not consistent with sustainability of basic life-nurturing conditions of planet and therefore must change in very significant ways. As the elites and their leaders are not willing to accept this, they instead create isolationist frameworks of checking climate change which protect their narrow interests but cannot succeed in resolving the basic problem. These can be self-defeating and even harmful, yet often succeed in creating a sense of false hope based on self-congratulatory talks and meetings. At the same time there are several steps backward rather than forward in terms of most real tasks needed.
To make a long story short, let us confine the discussion on real tasks here to just three aspects. Firstly, to protect sustainable livelihoods and provide healthy food to the world, we need a strong base of small farmers engaged in ecologically protective farming. Such worldwide efforts can in addition make an enormous contribution to climate change mitigation as well as adaptation. However, what big business interests frequently supported by various governments, are in fact doing is just the opposite of this by extending their ecologically destructive farming, trading and control patterns all over the world.
Secondly, it is increasingly realized that a range of very dangerous products and technologies are being promoted by big business interests, often with government support, which actually need to be significantly reduced. These products range from alcohol and various other intoxicants to a range of dangerous and frequently untested (or very inadequately tested) chemicals. While a two-third or so reduction in these products and gadgets (and the frequency of their use) will contribute greatly to protecting and improving physical and mental health, this will also contribute greatly to checking GHG emissions and climate change.
Thirdly, arms race and weapons have now reached a stage where these threaten the survival of all forms of life and where weapons production (and sale) is not just the means but even the cause of wars. So it is essential to have a future of no wars, of no weapons of mass destruction and of a huge, over two-thirds reduction of all weapons to ensure our safety and the safety of our children. Crucial as this is for our safety, this by itself will achieve a huge reduction in GHG emissions as well as war, war preparations and weapons together constitute the biggest emitter.
So while the list can be a much longer one, what has been shown above very briefly is that merely pursuing the most welfare-oriented agenda in just three areas can achieve reduction of GHG emissions in a huge way, while at the same time contributing also to creating a much safer and healthier world with much reduced hunger and deprivation. In this framework, checking climate agenda is not regarded as a huge burden but instead a host of most rational and welfare oriented changes are introduced in various sectors which simultaneously advance human welfare and check climate change. Replacement of fossil fuels by renewable energy continues to get importance, but more of this in ways that integrate a host of welfare oriented rational changes in various sectors.
Briefly, we end by re-emphasizing that we need an all-inclusive agenda of integrating checking of climate change with broader objectives of peace, equality, justice, genuine democracy, environment and bio-diversity protection, while giving up the present isolationist, reductionist approach which has failed and is also deeply flawed conceptually.
---
He writer is Honorary Convener, Campaign to Save Earth Now. His recent books include 'Planet in Peril', 'Protecting Earth for Children', 'Earth without Borders' and 'A Day in 2071'

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Was Netaji forced to alter face, die in obscurity in USSR in 1975? Was he so meek?

  By Rajiv Shah   This should sound almost hilarious. Not only did Subhas Chandra Bose not die in a plane crash in Taipei, nor was he the mysterious Gumnami Baba who reportedly passed away on 16 September 1985 in Ayodhya, but we are now told that he actually died in 1975—date unknown—“in oblivion” somewhere in the former Soviet Union. Which city? Moscow? No one seems to know.

Love letters in a lifelong war: Babusha Kohli’s resistance in verse

By Ravi Ranjan*  “War does not determine who is right—only who is left.” Bertrand Russell’s words echo hauntingly in our times, and few contemporary Hindi poets embody this truth as profoundly as Babusha Kohli. Emerging from Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, Kohli has carved a unique space in literature by weaving together tenderness, protest, and philosophy across poetry, prose, and cinema. Her work is not merely artistic expression—it is resistance, refuge, and a call for peace.

Authoritarian destruction of the public sphere in Ecuador: Trumpism in action?

By Pilar Troya Fernández  The situation in Ecuador under Daniel Noboa's government is one of authoritarianism advancing on several fronts simultaneously to consolidate neoliberalism and total submission to the US international agenda. These are not isolated measures, but rather a coordinated strategy that combines job insecurity, the dismantling of the welfare state, unrestricted access to mining, the continuation of oil exploitation without environmental considerations, the centralization of power through the financial suffocation of local governments, and the systematic criminalization of all forms of opposition and popular organization.

The golden crop: How turmeric is transforming women's lives in tribal India

By Vikas Meshram*   When the lush green fields of turmeric sway in the tribal belt of southern Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, and Gujarat, it is not merely a spice crop — it is the golden glow of self-reliance. In villages where even basic spices once had to be bought from the market, the very soil today is yielding a prosperity that has transformed the lives of thousands of families. At the heart of this transformation is the initiative of Vaagdhara, which has linked turmeric with livelihoods, nutrition, and village self-governance — gram swaraj.

Echoes of Vietnam and Chile: The devastating cost of the I-A Axis in Iran

​ By Ram Puniyani  ​The recent joint military actions by Israel and the United States against Iran have been devastating. Like all wars, this conflict is brutal to its core, leaving a trail of human suffering in its wake. The stated pretext for this aggression—the brutality of the Ayatollah Khamenei regime and its nuclear ambitions—clashes sharply with the reality of the diplomatic landscape. Iran had expressed a willingness to remain at the negotiating table, signaling a readiness to concede points emerging from dialogue. 

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

The price of silence: Why Modi won’t follow Shastri, appeal for sacrifice

By Arundhati Dhuru, Sandeep Pandey*  ​In 1965, as India grappled with war and a crippling food crisis, Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri faced a United States that used wheat shipments under the PL-480 agreement as a lever to dictate Indian foreign policy. Shastri’s response remains legendary: he appealed to the nation to skip one meal a day. Millions of middle-class households complied, choosing temporary hunger over the sacrifice of national dignity. Today, India faces a modern equivalent in the energy sector, yet the leadership’s response stands in stark contrast to that era of self-reliance.

False claim? What Venezuela is witnessing is not surrender but a tactical retreat

By Manolo De Los Santos  The early morning hours of January 3, 2026, marked an inflection point in Venezuela and Latin America’s centuries-long struggle for self-determination and independence. Operation Absolute Resolve, ordered by the Trump administration, constituted the most brutal and direct military assault on a sovereign state in the region in recent memory. In a shocking operation that left hundreds dead, President Nicolás Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores were illegally kidnapped from Venezuelan soil and transported to the United States, where they now face fabricated charges in a New York federal detention facility. In the two months since this act of war, a torrent of speculation has emerged from so-called experts and pundits across the political spectrum. This has followed three main lines: One . The operation’s success indicated treason at the highest levels of the Bolivarian Revolution. Two . Acting President Delcy Rodríguez and the remaining leadership have abandone...