Skip to main content

Tremors in Surat, Bhavnagar: Quake measurement centre hasn't functioned properly around Narmada dam

By A Representative
Tremors of the magnitude of 4.7 on the Richter scale in Gujarat, from Surat to Bhavnagar, has once again initiated the debate on whether the Narmada dam is safe. While official sources immediately spread that the dam is strongly built to face tremors, critics have said, the presence of a large dam does not ensure the safety of the surrounding areas and the people residing there.
In a statement, top anti-dam activist Medha Patkar has said, "All the dams on Narmada, including the Sardar Sarovar and other large dams, have been built on fault-lines, thereby making the entire region earthquake-prone.”
Pointing out that this fact is “known to those in power”, the statement says, “According to the Sardar Sarovar Narmada Nigam Ltd (SSNNL), the foundation of the Sardar Sarovar Dam is claimed to be stronger than any other large dam in the world.”
It is further claimed, says the statement, that the “treatment of geological fault involved 2,14,000 m3 of excavation, 2,50,000 m3 of rock excavation and 2,56,000 m3 of pre-cooled concrete and 53,000 tonnes of reinforcement steel.”
Yet, says the statement, “it is sought to be demonstrated that the dam authorities have little or no concern for ecological balance (given the amount of excavation in the river), concerns over earthquake etc. and completely turns a blind eye to the environment.”
Not that this was never realized, the statement says. Thus, “it was agreed upon in 1987 that proper and complete research would be carried out on the issue of seismicity and also regularly informing the people of these changes.”

“The three states of Gujarat, Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh took up the responsibility of setting up centres to measure earthquake indicators and magnitude levels. Nine centres were set up, with five in Gujarat, three in Madhya Pradesh and one in Maharashtra”, the statement says.

“Despite regular visits and expertise of experts from the USA and India, there has been no serious work undertaken on earthquake of magnitude levels over 3 in the Richter scale”, the statement says.

It points out, “It is also mentioned in the Annual Reports of the Narmada Control Authority (NCA) that the Institute of Seismology Research and the Gujarat government had to conduct regular research work, which was however not done.”

“This very serious research undertaking was allotted only a meagre sum of 6,82,740 for research work from 1995 to2003 and beyond; it also encompassed the research work done in 2007-09”, the statement says.

Revealing that the findings of these research undertakings have not been made public, the statement says, “The epicenter of the Kutch earthquake too was close to the Sardar Sarovar Dam, and despite a petition filed by scientists such as late Mukul Singh and others in the High Court, no hearing was held.”
The statement regrets, despite repeated attempts, the Government of Gujarat and the Central Government have not disclose all the information related to the causes of earthquakes”. It adds,“Therefore, it is imperative for the people of Gujarat, and particularly Kutch and Saurashtra, Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh to speak up and demand for full truthful disclosure of information.”
“In the cases of earthquakes from both the Bargi Dam on the Narmada or the Koyna Dam in Maharashtra, there was indeed a damage of crores of life and property”, the statement says, adding, “It is therefore necessary that the people of Gujarat realize the truth about the potential dangers of large dams immediately!”

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan  The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

'Big blow to crores of farmers’: Opposition mounts against US–India trade deal

By A Representative   Farmers’ organisations and political groups have sharply criticised the emerging contours of the US–India trade agreement, warning that it could severely undermine Indian agriculture, depress farm incomes and open the doors to genetically modified (GM) food imports in violation of domestic regulatory safeguards.

Penpa Tsering’s leadership and record under scrutiny amidst Tibetan exile elections

By Tseten Lhundup*  Within the Tibetan exile community, Penpa Tsering is often described as having risen through grassroots engagement. Born in 1967, he comes from an ordinary Tibetan family, pursued higher education at Delhi University in India, and went on to serve as Speaker of the Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile from 2008 to 2016. In 2021, he was elected Sikyong of the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA), becoming the second democratically elected political leader of the administration after Lobsang Sangay. 

Michael Parenti: Scholar known for critiques of capitalism and U.S. foreign policy

By Harsh Thakor*  Michael Parenti, an American political scientist, historian, and author known for his Marxist and anti-imperialist perspectives, died on January 24 at the age of 92. Over several decades, Parenti wrote and lectured extensively on issues of capitalism, imperialism, democracy, media, and U.S. foreign policy. His work consistently challenged dominant political and economic narratives, particularly those associated with Western liberal democracies and global capitalism.

From Puri to the State: How Odisha turned the dream of drinkable tap water into policy

By Hans Harelimana Hirwa, Mansee Bal Bhargava   Drinking water directly from the tap is generally associated with developed countries where it is considered safe and potable. Only about 50 countries around the world offer drinkable tap water, with the majority located in Europe and North America, and a few in Asia and Oceania. Iceland, Switzerland, Finland, Germany, and Singapore have the highest-quality tap water, followed by Canada, New Zealand, Japan, the USA, Australia, the UK, Costa Rica, and Chile.