Skip to main content

Solidarity note: HDRC ad was meant to promote constitutional values of equality


Counterview Desk 
An advertisement issued on April 6, 2016 by an Ahmedabad-based NGO, Human Development and Resource Centre (HDRC), recently turned into a full-blown controversy in Gujarat two and a half months later, because it called for giving preference to a non-reservation category person for the post of cleaner. It led to violent attacks  on HDRC’s building, situated within the St Xavier’s College campus. The attackers, owing allegiance to saffron ideology, especially objected to naming caste/religious denominations as examples from whom the sweeper would be preferred. Tens of activists have come forward to support the HDRC and issued the following note:
***
We the undersigned concerned individual citizens would like to make our position/ stand public regarding a recent Human Development and Research Center (HDRC) advertisement to recruit sweepers for their office, stating that preference would be given to applicants from general category, who do not fall under reserved categories.
A series of violent protests were staged by different community groups against HDRC and its Director Prasad Chacko for hurting their individual and community feelings through that advertisement. This has been covered in both print and electronic media; hence it need not be elaborated. Many individuals and groups have filed a complaint against HDRC and Chacko with Gujarat Police Station under section 153 A of IPC. In addition to that many have given notice for clarification from HDRC and threatened to file legal complaints if HDRC does not provide appropriate clarifications and apologies.
In response to this, HDRC clarified their views on the advertisement clearly stating that it was absolutely not intended to hurt any one’s feelings, but to promote constitutional values and provisions and increased access to equal opportunity for all; especially in the occupations which are forced upon specific communities based on their social and caste identity. HDRC also expressed regret for having hurt the feelings of any individuals or community.
We the undersigned do share following common views and reflections vis-a-vis the advertisement and incidents which took place in its aftermath:The advertisement put forward does not violate any law of the land rather it appears to promote the principles of equality guaranteed by the constitution.
The names of communities mentioned in bracket were presented as instances and not specifying that they seek people from those specific communities.
We appreciate the initiative taken up by HDRC and its director to bring up the most pertinent issue into public discourse and challenge the systemic practices of inequality up front.
We firmly stand by HDRC and its Director Prasad Chacko in this time of anguish they are going through and will continue to support them in fighting for justice.
The protest against the advertisement might have hurt some people`s sentiments as it is claimed. But it also indicates insensitivity on the part of the larger society towards a particular community which has been forced to engage in this occupation for thousands of years. It also highlights how deep-rooted caste system, caste based discrimination exists.
We the undersigned have also come across following views and reflections coming from different people/organizations which are worrisome:Prasad has unnecessarily and intentionally invited the ruckus by way of job advertisement.
A number of secular individuals and organizations joined hands in support of HDRC. Barring some, they were predominantly Dalit rights activists and organizations. Hence, the issue remained a Dalit rights issue and not an issue of human dignity, equality and rights.
It is sad to note that, apart from groups of the so-called upper castes, other marginalized and minority community organizations have also imbibed the social evils of caste system and are practicing it, especially Muslim, Syrian Christians and Parsi communities in this case (this is evident from the fact that community leaders/ organizations from these communities joined the protest, made phone calls and sent memoranda/ complains to HDRC directly or via different mediums).
In the light of the above-mentioned views, reflections, experiences and concerns, we would like to put forward following appeal for action to all those concerned and who are struggling to ensure human dignity, equality, rights and unity. It is a call to ponder upon and contribute in whatever ways they can to take it forward:While continuing our efforts of empowerment and development of the most marginalized, we must stand in solidarity and support any individual/organization which challenges such unjust caste system and takes initiatives towards elimination of unjust systems.
In such situations we should openly come out of our comfort zones and stand firm and united and put aside our individual differences.
We as concerned citizens need to come forward to introspect about this caste based occupation and challenge the connection between occupation and the caste in our own way. So that sweeping and other such occupations are not associated to a particular caste any more. Thus, it should become just as occupations irrespective of caste, religion or any other ethnic identity.
---
In solidarity,
Jitendra Rathod, Hozefa Ujjaini, Debarun Dutta, Manan Trivedi, Rohit Prajapati, Hasina Khan, Nayan Patel, Neha Dabhade, Sahiyar (Shtri Sangathan), Vijay Parmar, Sushila Prajapati, Mustaqueali Shaikh, Fr. Cedric Prakash SJ., Johanna Lokhande, Devendra Makwana, Advaita Marathe, K Shrinivas , Brinda Pancholi, Irfan Engineer, Janisar Shaikh, B Chakradhar, Pankaj Zapadiya, Parsottam Vaghela, Mohan Krishna, Robert David, Geeta Oza, Karuppusamy, S. Vishwanathan, Mehul Manguben, Rafi Malek, Vasudev Charupa, Renu Desai, Rajesh Singh, Annie Namala, Indu Prakash, P.L.Mimroth, Harsh Mander, Shabnam Hashmi, Ovais Sultan Khan, Valay Singh, Shweta Tripathi, Sanjeev Kumar, Vimalbhai, Ishwar Vaghela, Franklin Christian, Asha Kowtal, Reshma Asrani, Rosemary Vishwanath, Fr. Aloy, Oblesh, Vijaya Kumar, Santosh Rohit, Satndar Bhagat, Kannadasan

Comments

Post a Comment

TRENDING

From Kerala to Bangladesh: Lynching highlights deep social faultlines

By A Representative   The recent incidents of mob lynching—one in Bangladesh involving a Hindu citizen and another in Kerala where a man was killed after being mistaken for a “Bangladeshi”—have sparked outrage and calls for accountability.  
Post a Comment
»

Gram sabha as reformer: Mandla’s quiet challenge to the liquor economy

By Raj Kumar Sinha*  This year, the Union Ministry of Panchayati Raj is organising a two-day PESA Mahotsav in Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, on 23–24 December 2025. The event marks the passage of the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 (PESA), enacted by Parliament on 24 December 1996 to establish self-governance in Fifth Schedule areas. Scheduled Areas are those notified by the President of India under Article 244(1) read with the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution, which provides for a distinct framework of governance recognising the autonomy of tribal regions. At present, Fifth Schedule areas exist in ten states: Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Odisha, Rajasthan and Telangana. The PESA Act, 1996 empowers Gram Sabhas—the village assemblies—as the foundation of self-rule in these areas. Among the many powers devolved to them is the authority to take decisions on local matters, including the regulation...
Post a Comment
»

When a city rebuilt forgets its builders: Migrant workers’ struggle for sanitation in Bhuj

Khasra Ground site By Aseem Mishra*  Access to safe drinking water and sanitation is not a privilege—it is a fundamental human right. This principle has been unequivocally recognised by the United Nations and repeatedly affirmed by the Supreme Court of India as intrinsic to the right to life and dignity under Article 21 of the Constitution. Yet, for thousands of migrant workers living in Bhuj, this right remains elusive, exposing a troubling disconnect between constitutional guarantees, policy declarations, and lived reality.
1 comment
»

Policy changes in rural employment scheme and the politics of nomenclature

By N.S. Venkataraman*  The Government of India has introduced a revised rural employment programme by fine-tuning the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), which has been in operation for nearly two decades. The MGNREGA scheme guarantees 100 days of employment annually to rural households and has primarily benefited populations in rural areas. The revised programme has been named VB-G RAM–G (Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission – Gramin). The government has stated that the revised scheme incorporates several structural changes, including an increase in guaranteed employment from 100 to 125 days, modifications in the financing pattern, provisions to strengthen unemployment allowances, and penalties for delays in wage payments. Given the extent of these changes, the government has argued that a new name is required to distinguish the revised programme from the existing MGNREGA framework. As has been witnessed in recent years, the introdu...
Post a Comment
»

Aravalli at the crossroads: Environment, democracy, and the crisis of justice

By  Rajendra Singh*  The functioning of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change has undergone a troubling shift. Once mandated to safeguard forests and ecosystems, the Ministry now appears increasingly aligned with industrial interests. Its recent affidavit before the Supreme Court makes this drift unmistakably clear. An institution ostensibly created to protect the environment now seems to have strayed from that very purpose.
Post a Comment
»

Making rigid distinctions between Indian and foreign 'historically untenable'

By A Representative   Oral historian, filmmaker and cultural conservationist Sohail Hashmi has said that everyday practices related to attire, food and architecture in India reflect long histories of interaction and adaptation rather than rigid or exclusionary ideas of identity. He was speaking at a webinar organised by the Indian History Forum (IHF).
Post a Comment
»

'Structural sabotage': Concern over sector-limited job guarantee in new employment law

By A Representative   The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has raised concerns over the passage of the Viksit Bharat – Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (VB–G RAM G), which was approved during the recently concluded session of Parliament amid protests by opposition members. The legislation is intended to replace the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA).
Post a Comment
»

'Festive cheer fades': India’s housing market hits 17‑quarter slump, sales drop 16% in Q4 2025

By A Representative   Housing sales across India’s nine major real estate markets fell to a 17‑quarter low in the October–December period of 2025, with overall absorption dropping 16% year‑on‑year to 98,019 units, according to NSE‑listed analytics firm PropEquity. This marks the weakest quarter since Q3 2021, despite the festive season that usually drives demand. On a sequential basis, sales slipped 2%, while new launches contracted by 4%.  
Post a Comment
»

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.
Post a Comment
»