Skip to main content

Minimalistic approach to rule-making creates confusion on implementing J&K RTI Act

Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative (CHRI) chairperson Jenaab Wajahat Habibullah, former Chief Information Commissioner, Central Information Commission, has sought the intervention of the Jammu & Kashmir chief minister on effective implementation of the J&K Right to Information Act, 2009. Text of the letter:
***
I am writing to you in my capacity as Chairperson of CHRI an international, independent, non-partisan, non-government organization headquartered in New Delhi. As you know, CHRI has worked closely with officials in the State Government and members of civil society in J&K for the practical realisation by the people of the State of the fundamental right to seek information from public authorities. Apart from spreading awareness about the procedures for seeking information from public authorities at the community level, CHRI is currently working with the district administration and social activists in Kulgam to make that district a model for the implementation of the J&K Right to information Act, with particular emphasis on proactive disclosure of information as per the law.
I am writing to invite your urgent attention to three issues. First, the J&K State Information Commission (JKSIC) has been functioning with only one State Information Commissioner for several months. The posts of State Chief Information Commissioner and that of an Information Commissioner are vacant. Appeals and complaints are accumulating before the Commission due to these vacancies, which arose when the State was under Governor’s rule, hampering the Commission’s ability to dispose of cases in a time bound manner, as required by the Act. You will appreciate that if the Commission is not able to dispose of people’s grievances regarding access to information in a timely manner, there is a real danger that they might lose faith in the Commission, and in the Act, which I know that you personally have always supported.
As the Chief Minister is the Chairperson of the 3-member committee that recommends names of suitable candidates for appointment to the JKSIC to the Hon’ble Governor, urge that you direct the General Administration Department (GAD) to initiate the process of identifying candidates for filling up the vacancies in continuance of J&K’s established tradition of selecting experienced experts from fields other than administration and governance such as law, social service, journalism, mass media, science, technology and management as specified in Section 12(5) of the J&K RTI Act.
In order to boost people’s confidence in the selection process, GAD, the nodal agency for implementing this law, might be directed to advertise the vacancies and invite applications from qualified people. Adopting a participatory process in the selection process will demonstrate your government’s commitment to select the most qualified and deserving candidates for appointment in a transparent manner.
Second, the comprehensive RTI Rules notified by the State Government in 2010 were replaced by a shorter set of Rules in 2012. This minimalistic approach to rule-making adopted by the previous Government has created confusion regarding the manner of implementation of the J&K RTI Act. For example, the 2010 Rules provided guidance about the rank at which a Public Information Officer may be appointed in every public authority. Those Rules also provided the legal basis for the Registry, the Secretariat and staff of the JKSIC. It also provided for a wing in the Commission to monitor compliance with the provisions of the RTI Act in various public authorities and a Public Relations Wing to smoothen the relationship between the seeker and the supplier of information.
The 2010 Rules, which carried the endorsement of the Central Information Commission as an improvement on the then Rules of the Government of India, provided for a detailed procedure for the disposal of first appeals within a public authority, and the manner in which the JKSIC would inquire into complaints and appeals. It also provided for a methodology to ensure compliance with the orders of the JKSIC. All these provisions are missing in the RTI Rules notified in 2012.
Consequently, there is lesser clarity about the manner in which the J&K RTI Act must be implemented. This was also brought to the notice of then Hon’ble Chief Minister Jenab Omar Abdullah. I suggest that you set up a committee comprising of representatives of all stakeholders such as Government, civil society actors and the JKSIC to re-examine the current set of RTI Rules as well as the Rules notified in 2010 and strengthen the procedures for implementing the J&K RTI Act.
Third, Section 23(1)(a) of the J&K RTI Act places a duty on the Government to conduct awareness raising programmes for the people of J&K about their rights for seeking and obtaining information with particular emphasis on disadvantaged segments of society. The J&K RTI Act is a seminal law that replaces the paradigm of governance from one of secrecy to that of openness, treating people as equal partners in decision-making, as it must be in any truly functional democracy.
A good way of spreading awareness about RTI would be to incorporate it as a subject matter in school and college text books. Children and youth inculcated early with the values of transparency and accountability necessary in public life will surely grow to be responsible citizens with a deep commitment to these values. This will greatly assist in your own endeavour towards inclusion of the youth in making governance in J&K more democratic, participatory, responsive and accountable than before. Indeed, it will be a strategic step to change the current mindset of undue secrecy and lack of adequate responsiveness towards the people that has been so evident at all levels up to the present.
Should you wish to discuss the issues raised in this letter in detail, you know that I personally and CHRI would be honoured to be at your disposal. I might be contacted at whabibullah@gmail.com or my colleague Mr. Venkatesh Nayak, Programme Coordinator, Access to Information Programme, CHRI (venkatesh@humanrightsinitiative.org; 011-43180215), in the matter.

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan  The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

'Big blow to crores of farmers’: Opposition mounts against US–India trade deal

By A Representative   Farmers’ organisations and political groups have sharply criticised the emerging contours of the US–India trade agreement, warning that it could severely undermine Indian agriculture, depress farm incomes and open the doors to genetically modified (GM) food imports in violation of domestic regulatory safeguards.

Penpa Tsering’s leadership and record under scrutiny amidst Tibetan exile elections

By Tseten Lhundup*  Within the Tibetan exile community, Penpa Tsering is often described as having risen through grassroots engagement. Born in 1967, he comes from an ordinary Tibetan family, pursued higher education at Delhi University in India, and went on to serve as Speaker of the Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile from 2008 to 2016. In 2021, he was elected Sikyong of the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA), becoming the second democratically elected political leader of the administration after Lobsang Sangay. 

Michael Parenti: Scholar known for critiques of capitalism and U.S. foreign policy

By Harsh Thakor*  Michael Parenti, an American political scientist, historian, and author known for his Marxist and anti-imperialist perspectives, died on January 24 at the age of 92. Over several decades, Parenti wrote and lectured extensively on issues of capitalism, imperialism, democracy, media, and U.S. foreign policy. His work consistently challenged dominant political and economic narratives, particularly those associated with Western liberal democracies and global capitalism.

From Puri to the State: How Odisha turned the dream of drinkable tap water into policy

By Hans Harelimana Hirwa, Mansee Bal Bhargava   Drinking water directly from the tap is generally associated with developed countries where it is considered safe and potable. Only about 50 countries around the world offer drinkable tap water, with the majority located in Europe and North America, and a few in Asia and Oceania. Iceland, Switzerland, Finland, Germany, and Singapore have the highest-quality tap water, followed by Canada, New Zealand, Japan, the USA, Australia, the UK, Costa Rica, and Chile.