Skip to main content

Admission policy row: JNU teachers oppose quota for teachers’ wards

By A Representative
 
The Jawaharlal Nehru University Teachers’ Association has opposed a proposal to introduce a 5% supernumerary quota for wards of university employees, including teachers, calling it a “regressive” shift in admission policy and demanding its immediate withdrawal.
In a statement issued after its General Body meeting held on April 21, the association said members had “unanimously decided to oppose” the move, which it attributed to a unilateral decision by Vice Chancellor Santishree Dhulipudi Pandit. The body maintained that the proposal “stemmed not from any demand raised by teachers” and described it as an outcome of “absolute control over the decision-making process.”
The teachers’ body argued that priority should instead be given to strengthening the university’s existing admission framework, particularly the deprivation points system. It called for the restoration of deprivation points in PhD admissions and their consistent application across programmes, stating that such measures would better address concerns related to inclusion and gender balance.
“The teachers of the University and their collective body have never sought such a privilege for their wards,” the statement said, adding that elected teacher representatives had recorded their dissent in writing despite not being allowed to speak at the Executive Council meeting.
The association also expressed concern that extending quota benefits to teachers’ children could undermine existing provisions meant for wards of non-teaching staff in Groups B, C and D. It described those provisions as “a vital measure” for ensuring access to students from less privileged backgrounds, and said granting similar benefits to teachers’ wards “lacks any rational or ethical justification.”
Criticising the committee that recommended the quota, the association said it failed to provide a convincing rationale and had reached its conclusions after limited deliberation. It reiterated its position with an “emphatic NO” to the proposal.
The statement further urged the administration to address what it described as pending concerns of faculty, including issues related to promotions, recruitment processes, housing allocation, and campus facilities such as childcare.
The association also raised broader concerns regarding governance and decision-making within Jawaharlal Nehru University, stating that it would formally communicate its objections to the Visitor and the Ministry of Education.

Comments

TRENDING

How strategic is India's commercial expansion in the Mediterranean?

By Vijay Prashad  On 26 October 2026, Greece’s foreign minister George Gerapetritis stood at the United Nations headquarters and rejected the maritime agreement between Turkey and Libya. Gerapetritis spoke on behalf of Greece of course, but also Bahrain, Cyprus, Egypt, the European Union, and the United Arab Emirates. Five days later, the Indian frigate INS Trishul entered Souda Bay in Crete as part of activities with the US Navy installation (Naval Support Activity) and with the NATO Maritime Interdiction Operational Training Centre. The sequence illuminates a developing strategic geography: India’s naval reach, its confrontation with Pakistan’s new Turkish partner, and its ambition to connect Indian capital to European markets increasingly converge in the eastern Mediterranean.

Asbestos found in 60% rangoli powder tested in India, Malaysia, England: Civil society sounds alert

Counterview News   Asbestos , a substance known to cause cancer, has been detected in 60 per cent of rangoli powder samples tested in a laboratory in South Korea, raising concerns about the safety of products used during Diwali and other festivals. Indian samples recorded particularly high contamination rates, according to an investigation released by environmental and public health organisations.

India among targets as China-linked hackers 'exploit' VPNs, firewalls

Counterview News   Cyberattackers grew faster and harder to detect in 2025, increasingly slipping through trusted systems rather than breaking in with obvious malware, claims U.S.-based  cybersecurity technology company CrowdStrike's 2026 Global Threat Report . The report says adversaries "grew more evasive than ever before," exploiting trust in supply chain partners, legitimate software, internal systems and employees. CrowdStrike now tracks 281 adversaries after naming 24 new ones in 2025, plus 150 activity clusters and emerging threat groups.