Skip to main content

Epstein files: Elite impunity and the crimes of patriarchal capitalism

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak* 
The more than three million Epstein files, including those already released, reveal not only an entrenched criminal network of perverted ruling elites and decayed capitalist socialites with an inhuman sexual appetite for young girls, but also expose their immense power, influence, and complete lack of accountability. Sexual trafficking and the exploitation of young girls lie at the heart of this criminal network of social, political, and economic elites. 
The impact of this exploitative, immoral, and sexually perverted nexus has far-reaching consequences for people, society, culture, politics, states, and governments across the globe. The ripple effects of these white-collar gangsters of libidinal capitalism will have lasting consequences that extend far beyond immediate comprehension.
However, the release of the Epstein files at this particular juncture appears to be less about the delivery of justice and more about systematically diverting public attention from the failures of market-led democracy, the bourgeois state, and the capitalist and imperialist global system. These systems have failed—both institutionally and procedurally—to address the everyday material and spiritual needs of people, particularly in delivering equality, liberty, and justice. The multiple material crises confronting the working masses are fundamentally produced by capitalism itself and threaten the very foundations of life, human dignity, and trust among people as social beings.
Trust in public life—across political, legal, social, economic, and intellectual processes, policies, institutions, and individuals—is the first casualty of the release of the Epstein files. The systematic disclosure of different aspects of these files undermines public confidence in political leaders, intellectuals, journalists, corporate executives, and other influential figures. This erosion of public trust is central to the growth of a culture of depoliticisation, which is itself a key requirement for capitalism. Democratic political accountability introduces checks and balances within political, legal, and economic systems—mechanisms of accountability that are anathema to capitalism. Consequently, a trustless, depoliticised, and unaccountable culture becomes conducive to capitalist dominance. This culture of distrust, along with the transient nature of profit-driven production systems, productivist values, and patterns of consumption, is fundamental to capitalism’s continued existence. The priests of capitalism therefore seize every opportunity and every event to deepen this culture of distrust.
The Epstein files also undermine the authority of democratic states and governments in the public eye, as sections of the ruling class are exposed as complicit in the illegal and immoral empire of the Epstein network and its heinous crimes. Undermining the democratic state and its claim to uphold the rule of law has long been a central agenda of capitalism. Capitalism prefers authoritarian states and governments that faithfully follow its dictates. Democratic forms of governance, or states with a radical orientation, are treated as aberrations and are therefore unacceptable to capitalist markets and their agents.
At the same time, the Epstein files normalise various forms of heinous crimes—such as sex trafficking and sexual violence—by revealing how ruling elites and their networks openly display hedonistic sexual lifestyles without legal accountability or even private remorse. This absence of accountability trickles down into everyday social life, where sexual violence is increasingly normalised or ignored. Such reactionary dynamics encourage violence against women and reproduce a feudal, patriarchal capitalist system in which the objectification of women’s bodies is treated as normal and acceptable.
The files further demonstrate how non-governing segments of the ruling class use the power of democratically elected leaders to enjoy privileges at the expense of popular democracy and the dignity of women. The trauma and fear inflicted on women by these agents of gangster capitalism serve as warnings to other women. Such a culture is deeply detrimental to the growth of a gender-equal society. The names contained in the Epstein files do not merely expose a billionaire “old boys’ club”; they reveal elite impunity that corrodes the legal system—one that is meant to protect rights, promote justice, and punish crime—so that sexual exploitation of women can be brought to an end.
Mainstream media coverage and the accompanying moral discourse around the Epstein files, with their fixation on powerful men and celebrity networks, eclipse the voices of victims and ignore the long-term impacts on individuals and societies across the globe. This trajectory—focused on scandal rather than justice—undermines legal processes and encourages the proliferation of criminal activity. The Epstein files do not merely expose the moral failures of powerful and perverted men; they uncover an organised crime syndicate centred on hedonistic pleasure through the trafficking and exploitation of young girls. The reach of this syndicate extends far beyond national borders, and its consequences will persist unless justice is delivered swiftly and decisively.
The Epstein affair once again reinforces the understanding that the struggle for women’s liberation is inseparable from the struggle against all forms of power sustained by the feudal, patriarchal capitalist system. This system, led by powerful men, reduces the female body to a commodity of pleasure while normalising violence and exploitation against women. Women’s struggles cannot be separated from the struggles of working people against feudalism, patriarchy, and capitalism. History bears witness to the successes of united struggles for collective emancipation from patriarchal capitalism—a system that exploits all by treating the human body as a commodity for leisure, pleasure, and profit. This objectified commodity culture not only endangers women but also threatens life itself and the planet. The struggle against such a system is therefore central to the pursuit of a dignified human life free from all forms of exploitation.
---
*Academic based in UK 

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan  The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Penpa Tsering’s leadership and record under scrutiny amidst Tibetan exile elections

By Tseten Lhundup*  Within the Tibetan exile community, Penpa Tsering is often described as having risen through grassroots engagement. Born in 1967, he comes from an ordinary Tibetan family, pursued higher education at Delhi University in India, and went on to serve as Speaker of the Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile from 2008 to 2016. In 2021, he was elected Sikyong of the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA), becoming the second democratically elected political leader of the administration after Lobsang Sangay. 

'Big blow to crores of farmers’: Opposition mounts against US–India trade deal

By A Representative   Farmers’ organisations and political groups have sharply criticised the emerging contours of the US–India trade agreement, warning that it could severely undermine Indian agriculture, depress farm incomes and open the doors to genetically modified (GM) food imports in violation of domestic regulatory safeguards.

From Puri to the State: How Odisha turned the dream of drinkable tap water into policy

By Hans Harelimana Hirwa, Mansee Bal Bhargava   Drinking water directly from the tap is generally associated with developed countries where it is considered safe and potable. Only about 50 countries around the world offer drinkable tap water, with the majority located in Europe and North America, and a few in Asia and Oceania. Iceland, Switzerland, Finland, Germany, and Singapore have the highest-quality tap water, followed by Canada, New Zealand, Japan, the USA, Australia, the UK, Costa Rica, and Chile.

Territorial greed of Trump, Xi Jinping, and Putin could make 2026 toxic

By N.S. Venkataraman*  The year 2025 closed with bloody conflicts across nations and groups, while the United Nations continued to appear ineffective—reduced to a debate forum with little impact on global peace and harmony.