Skip to main content

Indigenous federation protests Big Cat Alliance meet in Karnataka forests

By A Representative
 
A federation of Adivasi gram sabhas from Nagarahole has strongly opposed the holding of the International Big Cat Alliance (IBCA) summit in Nagarahole and Bandipur tiger reserves from February 9 to 12, 2026, accusing the Centre and the Karnataka government of ignoring long-standing human rights violations faced by Indigenous communities in the name of wildlife conservation. The objections were raised by the Nagarahole Adivasi Jammapale Hakku Sthapana Samiti (NAJHSS), which represents gram sabhas within the Nagarahole forests, following the Union Finance Minister’s recent announcement that the IBCA summit would be hosted at the two protected areas.
In a detailed statement issued from Nagarahole, the NAJHSS described the summit as an “extravagant” international event being organised at a time of global concern over climate change and biodiversity loss, while Indigenous peoples living within protected areas continue to face displacement, coercion and denial of basic rights. The federation alleged that IBCA, launched by Prime Minister Narendra Modi in April 2023, is being used as a global platform to legitimise further occupation and exploitation of Indigenous lands through conservation-driven projects backed by corporate and international funding.
The Adivasi organisation recalled that Indigenous communities in Nagarahole had protested the inauguration of IBCA in Mysuru in 2023, coinciding with the 50th anniversary of Project Tiger, to draw attention to decades of forced evictions and human rights violations carried out in the name of tiger conservation. According to the NAJHSS, these concerns have been consistently ignored by successive governments. The statement criticised both the BJP-led Union government and the Congress-led Siddaramaiah government in Karnataka, alleging that despite differences in political claims, both have continued policies that result in the forcible eviction and marginalisation of forest-dwelling communities.
The NAJHSS reiterated its demand for legal recognition of community forest rights and habitat rights of the Jenu Kuruba community under the Forest Rights Act, 2006, stating that these rights have been unlawfully denied in Nagarahole. It also condemned what it termed “greenwashing” initiatives such as nature-based solutions, biodiversity offsetting, wildlife tourism and green credits, alleging that these approaches enable large-scale extraction and profit-making at the cost of Indigenous lands and livelihoods. The organisation accused the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, the National Tiger Conservation Authority and several national and international conservation groups of playing a role in advancing these agendas.
Referring to the history of conservation in India, the statement noted that all officially declared tiger reserves are located on Indigenous ancestral lands and were notified without the free, prior and informed consent of the communities concerned. It alleged that since the creation of the National Tiger Conservation Authority in 2005, forced evictions from tiger reserves have often been portrayed as voluntary relocations, causing irreversible damage to Indigenous cultures and livelihoods. The NAJHSS also referred to a directive issued in June 2023, which it said intensified threats of displacement, and claimed that no adequate response or clarification has been provided despite widespread protests by Indigenous peoples across the country.
The federation emphasised that communities such as the Jenu Kuruba, Beta Kuruba, Paniya and Yerava have lived in Nagarahole for generations and have traditionally conserved forests and wildlife through customary practices and belief systems that treat humans, animals and forests as equals. It stated that many animal species and natural features in the region are worshipped as deities and protected through traditional governance systems recognised under the Constitution, the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act and the Forest Rights Act. Despite this, the statement alleged that forest officials have filed cases and issued threats against community members even for conducting sacred rituals, and that dispossession has continued since the area was first declared a reserved forest in the nineteenth century and later converted into a national park and tiger reserve.
The NAJHSS also referred to a recent development at the international level, stating that following a foot march through villages in Mysuru and Kodagu districts in January 2026, the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination formally wrote to the Government of India acknowledging decades of human rights violations faced by Indigenous peoples in Nagarahole and elsewhere. According to the organisation, there has been no response so far from the Union or state governments or concerned authorities.
As international delegates from more than 20 countries arrive for the IBCA summit, the NAJHSS said it wants participants to recognise that Nagarahole is Indigenous ancestral territory and to reflect on the unresolved injustices linked to conservation policies. The federation urged visitors to respect the rights, dignity and traditional governance of Indigenous communities, asserting that conservation cannot be pursued by excluding or displacing the people who have historically protected these forests.

Comments

TRENDING

Countrywide protest by gig workers puts spotlight on algorithmic exploitation

By A Representative   A nationwide protest led largely by women gig and platform workers was held across several states on February 3, with the Gig & Platform Service Workers Union (GIPSWU) claiming the mobilisation as a success and a strong assertion of workers’ rights against what it described as widespread exploitation by digital platform companies. Demonstrations took place in Delhi, Rajasthan, Karnataka, Maharashtra and other states, covering major cities including New Delhi, Jaipur, Bengaluru and Mumbai, along with multiple districts across the country.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan  The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Paper guarantees, real hardship: How budget 2026–27 abandons rural India

By Vikas Meshram   In the history of Indian democracy, the Union government’s annual budget has always carried great significance. However, the 2026–27 budget raises several alarming concerns for rural India. In particular, the vague provisions of the VBG–Ram Ji scheme and major changes to the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGA) have put the future of rural workers at risk. A deeper reading of the budget reveals that these changes are not merely administrative but are closely tied to political and economic priorities that will have far-reaching consequences for millions of rural households.

Penpa Tsering’s leadership and record under scrutiny amidst Tibetan exile elections

By Tseten Lhundup*  Within the Tibetan exile community, Penpa Tsering is often described as having risen through grassroots engagement. Born in 1967, he comes from an ordinary Tibetan family, pursued higher education at Delhi University in India, and went on to serve as Speaker of the Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile from 2008 to 2016. In 2021, he was elected Sikyong of the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA), becoming the second democratically elected political leader of the administration after Lobsang Sangay. 

'Gandhi Talks': Cinema that dares to be quiet, where music, image and silence speak

By Vikas Meshram   In today’s digital age, where reels and short videos dominate attention spans, watching a silent film for over two hours feels almost like an act of resistance. Directed by Kishor Pandurang Belekar, “Gandhi Talks” is a bold cinematic experiment that turns silence into language and wordlessness into a powerful storytelling device. The film is not mere entertainment; it is an experience that pushes the viewer inward, compelling reflection on life, values, and society.

Frugal funds, fading promises: Budget 2026 exposes shrinking space for minority welfare

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  The Ministry of Minority Affairs was established in 2006 during the tenure of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, following the findings of the Sachar Committee, which documented that Muslims were among the most educationally and economically disadvantaged communities in India. The ministry was conceived as a corrective institutional response to deep structural inequalities faced by religious minorities, particularly Muslims, through focused policy interventions.