Skip to main content

What the RSS wanted instead of India’s Constitution—and why it matters today

By Shamsul Islam*  
The Constituent Assembly (CA) of India passed the Constitution on November 26, 1949, after almost three years of deliberation. This was an extraordinary contribution to the history of modern liberal democracies. Not only was it the lengthiest constitution in the world—reflecting the vast diversity of the polity it was meant to govern—but it also set out egalitarian, democratic and non-sectarian ideals rarely attempted before in the non-Western world.
This commitment was explicit in the Preamble, which declared:
“WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA, having solemnly resolved to constitute India into a SOVEREIGN SOCIALIST SECULAR DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC and to secure to all its citizens: JUSTICE, social, economic and political; LIBERTY of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship; EQUALITY of status and of opportunity; and to promote among them all FRATERNITY assuring the dignity of the individual and the unity and integrity of the Nation;
IN OUR CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY this 26th day of November 1949, do HEREBY ADOPT, ENACT AND GIVE TO OURSELVES THIS CONSTITUTION.”
RSS Demanded Manusmriti as the Constitution
The addition of the terms Socialist and Secular in 1977 only strengthened the Constituent Assembly’s original resolve that India would be a non-sectarian polity rooted in the collective will of its people.
It is therefore striking that the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), which today wields enormous influence over Indian politics through the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and its cadre (including Prime Minister Narendra Modi), mourned the birth of the Indian Constitution. The RSS expressed deep anger when the Constituent Assembly adopted a democratic and secular Constitution under the chairmanship of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar.
The RSS weekly Organizer, in its editorial dated November 30, 1949 titled “Constitution”, declared:
“The worst about the new Constitution of Bharat is that there is nothing Bhartiya about it… There is no trace of ancient Bhartiya constitutional laws, institutions, nomenclatures and phraseology in it… Manu's Laws were written long before Lycurgus of Sparta or Solon of Persia. To this day his laws as enunciated in the Manusmriti excite the admiration of the world and elicit spontaneous obedience and conformity. But to our constitutional pundits that means nothing.”
The RSS’s disdain for the Constitution was further articulated by its most influential ideologue, M.S. Golwalkar:
“Our Constitution too is just a cumbersome and heterogeneous piecing together of various articles from various Constitutions of the Western countries. It has absolutely nothing which can be called our own.”
— M.S. Golwalkar, Bunch of Thoughts, Sahitya Sindhu, Bangalore, 1996, p. 238.
By advocating Manusmriti as India’s constitution, the RSS echoed the long-held views of its ideological icon V.D. Savarkar, who wrote:
“Manusmriti is that scripture which is most worship-able after Vedas for our Hindu Nation… Even today the rules which are followed by crores of Hindus… are based on Manusmriti. Today Manusmriti is Hindu Law.”
— V.D. Savarkar, “Women in Manusmriti,” in Savarkar Samagar, vol. 4.
Manusmriti, Casteism and the RSS Worldview
The Manusmriti’s hierarchical, caste-based worldview aligns with the RSS’s conception of Hindu nationalism. Golwalkar openly declared caste as integral to the Hindu nation:
“The Hindu People… is the Virat Purusha… Brahmin is the head, Kshatriya the hands, Vaishya the thighs and Shudra the feet… This is the very core of our concept of ‘nation’.”
— M.S. Golwalkar, Bunch of Thoughts, pp. 36–37.
This worldview naturally legitimises caste hierarchy, including the practice of untouchability. Below is a selection of dehumanising provisions from the Laws of Manu, which demonstrate the kind of social order the RSS’s Manusmriti-based vision implies.
Selected Manusmriti Laws Targeting Dalits/Shudras
- “One occupation only the lord prescribed to the Sudras: to serve meekly even these (other) three castes.” (I/91)
- “Once-born man (a Sudra) who insults a twice-born man… shall have his tongue cut out.” (VIII/270)
- “If he mentions the names and castes of the twice-born with contumely, an iron nail… shall be thrust red-hot into his mouth.” (VIII/271)
- “If he arrogantly teaches Brahmanas their duty… hot oil shall be poured into his mouth and ears.” (VIII/272)
- “A low-caste man who tries to sit on the same seat as a high caste man shall be branded on his hip and banished.” (VIII/281)
In contrast, the Manusmriti prescribes extraordinary leniency for Brahmins:
- "Let him never slay a Brahmana, though he have committed all possible crimes.” (VIII/380)
Selected Manusmriti Laws Degrading Women
- “Day and night woman must be kept in dependence by the males of their families.” (IX/2)
- “A woman is never fit for independence.” (IX/3)
- “Women… give themselves to the handsome and to the ugly; ‘it is enough that he is a man.’” (IX/14)
- “Manu allotted to women impure desires, wrath, dishonesty, malice, and bad conduct.” (IX/17)
These laws speak for themselves—patriarchal, casteist, deeply discriminatory. It is no surprise that Friedrich Nietzsche, whose thought shaped several totalitarian ideologies, admired the Manusmriti.
It was in protest against these very codes that a copy of the Manusmriti was burned at Mahad on December 25, 1927, in the presence of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, who called the day Manusmriti Dahan Diwas.
RSS Hatred for Democracy
Although the RSS once criticised detention without trial when Sardar Patel was Home Minister, it abandoned those concerns once in power. The Organizer had written:
Section 21 and 22 providing for detention without trial reduce all the wordy assurances about liberty, equality and fraternity to meaningless verbiage.”
Organizer, November 30, 1949
Under the RSS-BJP government led by Prime Minister Modi, India has drifted toward a majoritarian, centralised, punitive order, where dissent is treated as anti-national. This mirrors the RSS’s long-standing hostility to democratic pluralism, epitomised in Golwalkar’s 1940 statement to 1,350 senior RSS cadres:
“RSS, inspired by one flag, one leader and one ideology, is lighting the flame of Hindutva in every corner of this great land.”
— M.S. Golwalkar, Shri Guruji Samagar Darshan, vol. 1, p. 11.
---
*Formerly with Delhi University, click here for Prof Islam's to writings, interviews, and books. Facebook: https://facebook.com/shamsul.islam.332. Twitter: @shamsforjustice. Blog: http://shamsforpeace.blogspot.com. Books: https://tinyurl.com/shams-books

Comments

TRENDING

The golden crop: How turmeric is transforming women's lives in tribal India

By Vikas Meshram*   When the lush green fields of turmeric sway in the tribal belt of southern Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, and Gujarat, it is not merely a spice crop — it is the golden glow of self-reliance. In villages where even basic spices once had to be bought from the market, the very soil today is yielding a prosperity that has transformed the lives of thousands of families. At the heart of this transformation is the initiative of Vaagdhara, which has linked turmeric with livelihoods, nutrition, and village self-governance — gram swaraj.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Love letters in a lifelong war: Babusha Kohli’s resistance in verse

By Ravi Ranjan*  “War does not determine who is right—only who is left.” Bertrand Russell’s words echo hauntingly in our times, and few contemporary Hindi poets embody this truth as profoundly as Babusha Kohli. Emerging from Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, Kohli has carved a unique space in literature by weaving together tenderness, protest, and philosophy across poetry, prose, and cinema. Her work is not merely artistic expression—it is resistance, refuge, and a call for peace.

Authoritarian destruction of the public sphere in Ecuador: Trumpism in action?

By Pilar Troya Fernández  The situation in Ecuador under Daniel Noboa's government is one of authoritarianism advancing on several fronts simultaneously to consolidate neoliberalism and total submission to the US international agenda. These are not isolated measures, but rather a coordinated strategy that combines job insecurity, the dismantling of the welfare state, unrestricted access to mining, the continuation of oil exploitation without environmental considerations, the centralization of power through the financial suffocation of local governments, and the systematic criminalization of all forms of opposition and popular organization.

Echoes of Vietnam and Chile: The devastating cost of the I-A Axis in Iran

​ By Ram Puniyani  ​The recent joint military actions by Israel and the United States against Iran have been devastating. Like all wars, this conflict is brutal to its core, leaving a trail of human suffering in its wake. The stated pretext for this aggression—the brutality of the Ayatollah Khamenei regime and its nuclear ambitions—clashes sharply with the reality of the diplomatic landscape. Iran had expressed a willingness to remain at the negotiating table, signaling a readiness to concede points emerging from dialogue. 

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

False claim? What Venezuela is witnessing is not surrender but a tactical retreat

By Manolo De Los Santos  The early morning hours of January 3, 2026, marked an inflection point in Venezuela and Latin America’s centuries-long struggle for self-determination and independence. Operation Absolute Resolve, ordered by the Trump administration, constituted the most brutal and direct military assault on a sovereign state in the region in recent memory. In a shocking operation that left hundreds dead, President Nicolás Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores were illegally kidnapped from Venezuelan soil and transported to the United States, where they now face fabricated charges in a New York federal detention facility. In the two months since this act of war, a torrent of speculation has emerged from so-called experts and pundits across the political spectrum. This has followed three main lines: One . The operation’s success indicated treason at the highest levels of the Bolivarian Revolution. Two . Acting President Delcy Rodríguez and the remaining leadership have abandone...

The selective memory of a violent city: Uttam Nagar and the invisible victims of Delhi

By Sunil Kumar*  Hundreds of murders take place in Delhi every year, yet only a few incidents become topics of nationwide discussion. The question is: why does this happen? Today, the incident in Uttam Nagar has become the centre of national debate. A 26-year-old man, Tarun Kumar, was killed following a dispute that reportedly began after a balloon hit a small child. In several colonies of Delhi, slogans such as “Jai Shri Ram” and “Vande Mataram” are being raised while demanding the death penalty for Tarun’s killers. As a result, nearly 50,000 residents of Hastsal JJ Colony are now living in what resembles a state of confinement. 

The price of silence: Why Modi won’t follow Shastri, appeal for sacrifice

By Arundhati Dhuru, Sandeep Pandey*  ​In 1965, as India grappled with war and a crippling food crisis, Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri faced a United States that used wheat shipments under the PL-480 agreement as a lever to dictate Indian foreign policy. Shastri’s response remains legendary: he appealed to the nation to skip one meal a day. Millions of middle-class households complied, choosing temporary hunger over the sacrifice of national dignity. Today, India faces a modern equivalent in the energy sector, yet the leadership’s response stands in stark contrast to that era of self-reliance.