Skip to main content

Adivasi rights group slams Supreme Court ruling on post-facto clearances

By A Representative
 
The Adivasi Adhikar Rashtriya Manch (AARM) has criticised a Supreme Court judgment that permits post-facto environmental clearances for projects begun without prior approval, calling the decision a major setback for environmental safeguards and Adivasi rights.
The ruling reverses the earlier Vanashakti judgment, which had struck down a central government notification allowing such post-facto clearances. AARM described the latest decision as “regressive” and said it effectively rewards violators while undermining the precautionary principle central to environmental regulation. The organisation argued that the judgment aligns with what it called the Centre’s pro-corporate approach to diluting rigorous environmental impact assessments.
AARM noted that the verdict came on a review petition filed by real estate developers, despite the absence of a review plea from the concerned ministry. The group endorsed the dissenting opinion of Justice Ujjal Bhuiyan, who, along with Justice Abhay Oka in the earlier bench, had held that the right to a safe environment is part of the fundamental right to life under Article 21. The dissent warned that treating environmental compliance as an obstruction to development would overturn decades of established jurisprudence.
According to AARM, the judgment poses serious implications for Adivasi communities, especially those in mineral-rich regions. It said the ruling could embolden mining and power companies to begin work without conducting environmental impact assessments or complying with laws that mandate prior consent from Gram Sabhas. The organisation cited a recent case in Chhattisgarh where a mining company felled trees without required permissions, and the court allowed the project to continue on the grounds that the violations were already committed.
AARM has demanded that the decision be reviewed again and that the Vanashakti judgment authored by Justice Abhay Oka be reinstated.
The statement was issued by AARM chairperson Jitendra Chaudhury and national coordinator Pulin Bihari Baske. The release was circulated from the organisation’s New Delhi office.

Comments

TRENDING

BRICS ends, but Bangladesh's empty chair says more than any declaration

By Nava Thakuria  The 18th BRICS Leaders' Summit, hosted by India at Bharat Mandapam in New Delhi on 12-13 September 2026, has concluded with leaders formally adopting the New Delhi Declaration. The gathering, themed "Building for Resilience, Innovation, Cooperation and Sustainability," drew Russian President Vladimir Putin, Chinese President Xi Jinping, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and other leaders of the now 11-member bloc, along with heads of partner organisations such as ASEAN, the African Union and the Eurasian Economic Union. Diplomats had worked through the final hours to bridge differences — notably between Iran and the UAE over West Asian tensions — before the declaration was signed.

Swaminarayan, untouchability and the 'we are not Hindu' argument

By Rajiv Shah   Following my blog on why the Eiffel Tower authorities should take all the blame for giving in to the Swaminarayan sadhus ’ bizarre demand to “invisibilise” women, including its female staff, during their visit to the internationally renowned Paris tourist centre on September 5, an interesting comment by one of the top academics drew my attention to something I vaguely knew about one of India’s most powerful and richest religious sects.

BAPS, the Eiffel Tower and the curious silence on secularism

By Rajiv Shah   I was a little surprised to see how some of those whom I respect for taking a firm stand on patriarchal issues reacted to the manner in which they responded to the recent incident in Paris, in which women employees of the Eiffel Tower were asked to remain "invisible" on September 5 when 100 BAPS sadhus visited one of the world's top tourist destinations.