Skip to main content

India’s reluctance to ratify UN torture convention undermines democratic commitments, says MASUM

By A Representative
 
On the 38th anniversary of the UN Convention Against Torture (UN CAT), Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Mancha (MASUM) issued a powerful statement condemning the continued use of torture in India and the state's failure to ratify the treaty. The organization observed the International Day in Support of Victims of Torture by standing in solidarity with survivors and demanding systemic reforms to end impunity and state-sponsored violence.
Despite having signed the Convention in 1997, India has yet to ratify it, and according to MASUM, this delay perpetuates a "facade of commitment" while torture is increasingly normalized. The group cites increasing reports of arbitrary arrests under laws like the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA), the construction of informal detention centers, and illegal pushbacks of Indian citizens across borders.
Kirity Roy, Secretary of MASUM and National Convenor of PACTI (Programme Against Custodial Torture & Impunity), asserted,  
"Without the abolition of torture, over half the citizenry—comprising, but not limited to, women and religious and caste minorities—risk being subjected to abuse with impunity in India."
Roy also criticized the failure of key institutions such as the National Human Rights Commission and over 175 Human Rights Institutions (HRIs), calling them "unresponsive and dysfunctional." He noted India’s non-implementation of the Istanbul Protocol, which lays out international standards for investigating and documenting torture.
MASUM outlined its core demands:
- Immediate ratification of the UN CAT and enactment of domestic anti-torture legislation.  
- Implementation of the Istanbul Protocol across all custodial institutions.  
- Release of arbitrarily detained individuals.  
- Restructuring of national and state human rights bodies for true accountability.  
- Establishment of Human Rights Courts in each Subdivision/Taluk as per the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993.
Roy concluded by reaffirming MASUM’s position:  
"We call for an end to torture and all forms of state violence, and for accountability at every step to uphold peace in the literal sense."

Comments

TRENDING

Neville Cardus: The man who turned cricket writing into poetry

By Harsh Thakor*  Neville Cardus was one of the most remarkable literary figures of the twentieth century. A prolific English writer and critic, he achieved distinction in two vastly different fields: cricket and classical music. Entirely self-taught, Cardus rose from humble beginnings to become both the cricket correspondent and chief music critic of The Manchester Guardian . His achievements in these contrasting disciplines earned him widespread acclaim and established him as one of the foremost critics of his generation. In February 2025, the cricketing and literary world marked the fiftieth anniversary of his death, which occurred in February 1975.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

The politics of dreaming: Savita Singh's feminist imagination

By Ravi Ranjan*  In contemporary Hindi poetry, few voices have explored the philosophical and creative possibilities of women's experience as powerfully as Savita Singh. Across collections such as "Svapna Samay" (Dream Time), Aapne Jaisa Jeevan, and "Prem Bhi Ek Yatana" Hai, she has developed a poetic world in which woman is not merely a subject of suffering or social commentary but a creator of knowledge, meaning, and alternative realities.