Skip to main content

RTI applicants can't be force to visit offices for payment, information collection: Navsari cop penalised

By A Representative 
In a significant ruling, the Gujarat State Information Commission (GSIC) has reinforced the provisions of the Gujarat RTI Rules, 2010, making it clear that applicants under the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005, cannot be compelled to visit government offices solely for the purpose of fee payment or collecting information.
The case pertains to Dr. Divyangi Patel, who runs a multi-speciality hospital on Khergam-Bahej Road in Navsari district. She had sought information from the Khergam Police Station regarding action taken on a complaint she had lodged. In response, the Public Information Officer (PIO), a Police Sub-Inspector, asked her to collect the information after making the required payment — but failed to mention the number of pages or permissible modes of payment, both of which are mandated under the Gujarat RTI Rules, 2010.
The rules allow RTI applicants to make payments through non-physical means such as Indian Postal Orders, demand drafts, government chalans, or pay orders — thus eliminating the need to visit government offices in person.
After Dr. Patel pointed out the relevant rules but received no further response, she filed a first appeal with the Superintendent of Police, who was found to be unaware of the PIO’s obligations under the RTI framework. She then approached the Gujarat State Information Commission.
Taking note of the matter, the Chief Information Commissioner ruled that the PIO’s actions amounted to a deliberate denial of information by failing to follow due process. A penalty of ₹5,000 was imposed on the Police Sub-Inspector for this non-compliance.
The order is particularly relevant in the context of ongoing complaints of police misconduct and intimidation of citizens visiting police stations. According to the Gujarat State Information Commission’s Annual Report for 2023–24, the Home Department received the highest number of RTI applications — 40,263 — indicating a strong demand for transparency and accountability in law enforcement.
The Commission’s ruling is expected to serve as a precedent, strengthening citizen rights under the RTI Act and pushing for greater administrative compliance with procedural norms.

Comments

Post a Comment

NOTE: While there is no bar on viewpoint, comments containing hateful or abusive language will not be published and will be marked spam. -- Editor

TRENDING

Manufacturing, services: India's low-skill, middle-skill labour remains underemployed

By Francis Kuriakose* The Indian economy was in a state of deceleration well before Covid-19 made its impact in early 2020. This can be inferred from the declining trends of four important macroeconomic variables that indicate the health of the economy in the last quarter of 2019.
Post a Comment
»

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”
Post a Comment
»

Food security? Gujarat govt puts more than 5 lakh ration cards in the 'silent' category

By Pankti Jog* A new statistical report uploaded by the Gujarat government on the national food security portal shows that ensuring food security for the marginalized community is still not a priority of the state. The statistical report, uploaded on December 24, highlights many weaknesses in implementing the National Food Security Act (NFSA) in state.
Post a Comment
»