Skip to main content

'Resolve peace process': Govt's travel restrictions on Naga leader Neingulo Krome condemned

By A Representative  
The Socialist Party (India) has strongly criticized the Government of India for preventing Neingulo Krome, Secretary General of the Naga People’s Movement for Human Rights (NPMHR), from traveling internationally. Krome was stopped at Indira Gandhi International Airport, New Delhi, on 7 April 2025, while en route to a conference of the Asia Indigenous Peoples Act in Kathmandu. This follows a similar incident in 2020 when he was barred from traveling to Bangkok from Kolkata airport.
The party has labeled these actions as arbitrary and illegal, asserting that they violate Krome’s rights under both national and international human rights frameworks. Known for his advocacy of Naga and indigenous peoples' rights, Krome has been a vocal proponent of the Naga cause.
The Socialist Party (India) has also criticized the government for its handling of the Naga peace process. Despite the 1997 ceasefire and the 2015 Framework Agreement signed with the National Socialist Council of Nagalim (Isak-Muivah), the party claims the government has failed to deliver a satisfactory resolution. The dialogue has reportedly stalled over demands for a separate flag and constitution for the Naga people, which the NSCN(IM) argues are integral to the concept of shared sovereignty outlined in the agreement.
The party further condemned the government’s withdrawal of the Free Movement Regime along the India-Myanmar border, which previously allowed members of Naga and Kuki communities to cross the border without a visa. This move, along with the fencing of the border, has been met with resistance from local communities.
Sandeep Pandey, General Secretary of the Socialist Party (India), and Alice Achumi, a member of the party’s National Committee, have called on the government to conclude the Naga peace process in a manner that respects the aspirations of the Naga people. They also demanded an end to the harassment of activists advocating for Naga rights.

Comments

TRENDING

Civil society at a crossroads: Service delivery vs. rights in the fight for social change

Counterview News   In the latest episode of the podcast Unmute , hosts Gagan Sethi and Minar Pimple convened a profound conversation with two veteran development practitioners to dissect a persistent tension within civil society: the perceived divide between service delivery and the struggle for rights. The episode, titled "Beyond Service Delivery: Civil Society, Rights, and the Politics of Social Change," featured Apoorva Oza , a development practitioner with decades of experience in rural development and institution-building, and Professor Dipa Sinha , a development economist known for her work on food, nutrition, gender, and social policy.

Sikkim governor row: ALIFA asks centre to explain hurried appointment in Ankita Bhandari case

By A Representative   The All-India Feminist Alliance (ALIFA) on Saturday expressed “immense pain and outrage” that even after four years and a national uproar, justice has not been fully delivered in the Ankita Bhandari murder case and that a ruling party politician facing allegations has been “gifted a high-ranking constitutional office.” In a statement, ALIFA extended “unflinching solidarity” to Ankita’s parents, who it said are “fighting for justice on the streets of Delhi,” and demanded that pending the CBI inquiry and judicial decision, the appointment of BJP leader Dushyant Kumar Gautam as Sikkim’s Governor be subject to “immediate presidential review.”

Grain vs. gasoline: How the global biofuel boom threatens India’s food and water security

By Rajiv Shah  A new report published by the international research and advocacy organization GRAIN has warned that the global resurgence of biofuels is triggering a dangerous dynamic of “more fuel, less food, more land grabs.” Driven by intersecting energy security concerns, geopolitical tensions, and aggressive decarbonization mandates, the expanding agrofuel industry is increasingly pitting corporate energy interests against global food security and indigenous land rights.