Skip to main content

How Pahalgam terror attack became a moment to unite, not divide, even in J&K

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat* 
The recent terror attack in Pahalgam has shaken the conscience of the nation. Yet, amidst the tragedy, it has also united people across India in empathy and solidarity. Tourists from Karnataka, Gujarat, Maharashtra, and other states have shared how local Kashmiris stood by them in their moment of fear. These are not just stories of survival, but powerful narratives of human connection and shared pain.
For perhaps the first time in two decades, people in the Valley—and across India—have felt a deep personal sense of loss. Local Kashmiris condemned the violence vocally and unequivocally. Masjids made announcements against the terrorists, a remarkable show of collective moral clarity. No one understands the trauma of living in a conflict zone better than the people of Jammu and Kashmir. Just as life had started inching toward normalcy, the terrorists struck again.
Unfortunately, for some, the tragedy became a political opportunity. Instead of fostering national unity, attempts were made to polarize, poison the discourse, and blame entire communities. Television channels descended to their usual gutter-level commentary. Some leaders within the BJP and the Sangh Parivar immediately reverted to their divisive Hindu-Muslim rhetoric. This must stop. The government must send a strong message: exploiting terror for political gain, or blaming Indian Muslims, will not be tolerated.
Let the law take its course. If any individuals from Jammu and Kashmir are found complicit, let the local administration and intelligence agencies act. But harassing innocent students and common citizens must be avoided at all costs. Encouragingly, senior police officials from Uttarakhand and West Bengal have issued reassuring statements, reminding us that constitutional values must prevail.
We must also recognize the source of this sustained threat: the open involvement of Pakistani military and intelligence. Even many Pakistani civilians are exhausted by this conflict and long for peace with India. However, as long as Pakistani leadership considers Kashmir their "unfinished agenda," progress will remain difficult. The recent communal comment by Pakistan's army chief only underscores how outdated and dangerous this thinking is—echoing even Jinnah’s own regrets at the end of his life.
It’s time South Asia moves beyond the ghosts of partition. Had we followed a different path, this region could have become a global powerhouse—perhaps even larger than the European Union. Instead, we’ve become prisoners of religion-based politics. Majoritarianism has flourished. Minorities live in fear, while non-state actors grow bolder.
India must lead by example. Every government official must uphold the Constitution. Those spreading hate and violating laws must face consequences—no exceptions. Governance cannot be conducted via Twitter or primetime propaganda. Donald Trump tried that, and we all saw how ineffective it was.
Wars of the future will be fought over water, not ideology. Our rivers connect states and nations, and only mutual cooperation can ensure lasting peace. India must take Pakistan's cross-border terrorism to global forums, using diplomatic channels smartly. Remember how Indira Gandhi travelled the world to expose Pakistan’s role in Bangladesh in 1971. Despite limited international influence then, her determined diplomacy paid off. Today, we are far more influential—but we must still act with the same grit and clarity.
Russia remains India’s time-tested ally. We could learn from Vladimir Putin’s strategic restraint and diplomatic precision. He may not post on social media, but he commands global attention. In contrast, rabble-rousing and jumlas won’t help India in global diplomacy.
It’s a welcome step that the government has called an all-party meeting. However, it would have been even more powerful had the Prime Minister himself participated. Instead, he addressed the media—seemingly more for international audiences than domestic consensus. If it was meant for Pakistan, they understand our language. If for the West, it's unclear whether they even take such soundbites seriously.
India stands united. What we need from our leaders now is sincerity—not just in words, but in actions. Act diplomatically or militarily—but do it for the nation, not for electoral gain. The response to the Pahalgam attack gives us an opportunity. Let this be a moment of healing, a reaffirmation of the idea of India: inclusive, resilient, and just.
---
*Freelance journalist 

Comments

TRENDING

Was Netaji forced to alter face, die in obscurity in USSR in 1975? Was he so meek?

  By Rajiv Shah   This should sound almost hilarious. Not only did Subhas Chandra Bose not die in a plane crash in Taipei, nor was he the mysterious Gumnami Baba who reportedly passed away on 16 September 1985 in Ayodhya, but we are now told that he actually died in 1975—date unknown—“in oblivion” somewhere in the former Soviet Union. Which city? Moscow? No one seems to know.

Love letters in a lifelong war: Babusha Kohli’s resistance in verse

By Ravi Ranjan*  “War does not determine who is right—only who is left.” Bertrand Russell’s words echo hauntingly in our times, and few contemporary Hindi poets embody this truth as profoundly as Babusha Kohli. Emerging from Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, Kohli has carved a unique space in literature by weaving together tenderness, protest, and philosophy across poetry, prose, and cinema. Her work is not merely artistic expression—it is resistance, refuge, and a call for peace.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Asbestos contamination in children’s products highlights global oversight gaps

By A Representative   A commentary published by the International Ban Asbestos Secretariat (IBAS) has drawn attention to the challenges governments face in responding effectively to global public-health risks. In an article written by Laurie Kazan-Allen and published on March 5, 2026, the author examines how the discovery of asbestos contamination in children’s play products has raised questions about regulatory oversight and international product safety. The article opens by reflecting on lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic, noting that governments in several countries were slow to respond to early warning signs of the crisis. Referring to the experience of the United Kingdom, the author writes that delays in implementing protective measures contributed to “232,112 recorded deaths and over a million people suffering from long Covid.” The commentary uses this example to illustrate what it describes as the dangers of underestimating emerging threats. Attention then turns...

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Echoes of Vietnam and Chile: The devastating cost of the I-A Axis in Iran

​ By Ram Puniyani  ​The recent joint military actions by Israel and the United States against Iran have been devastating. Like all wars, this conflict is brutal to its core, leaving a trail of human suffering in its wake. The stated pretext for this aggression—the brutality of the Ayatollah Khamenei regime and its nuclear ambitions—clashes sharply with the reality of the diplomatic landscape. Iran had expressed a willingness to remain at the negotiating table, signaling a readiness to concede points emerging from dialogue. 

Authoritarian destruction of the public sphere in Ecuador: Trumpism in action?

By Pilar Troya Fernández  The situation in Ecuador under Daniel Noboa's government is one of authoritarianism advancing on several fronts simultaneously to consolidate neoliberalism and total submission to the US international agenda. These are not isolated measures, but rather a coordinated strategy that combines job insecurity, the dismantling of the welfare state, unrestricted access to mining, the continuation of oil exploitation without environmental considerations, the centralization of power through the financial suffocation of local governments, and the systematic criminalization of all forms of opposition and popular organization.

The kitchen as prison: A feminist elegy for domestic slavery

By Garima Srivastava* Kumar Ambuj stands as one of the most incisive voices in contemporary Hindi poetry. His work, stripped of ornamentation, speaks directly to the lived realities of India’s marginalized—women, the rural poor, and those crushed under invisible forms of violence. His celebrated poem “Women Who Cook” (Khānā Banātī Striyāṃ) is not merely about food preparation; it is a searing indictment of patriarchal domestic structures that reduce women’s existence to endless, unpaid labour.

The price of silence: Why Modi won’t follow Shastri, appeal for sacrifice

By Arundhati Dhuru, Sandeep Pandey*  ​In 1965, as India grappled with war and a crippling food crisis, Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri faced a United States that used wheat shipments under the PL-480 agreement as a lever to dictate Indian foreign policy. Shastri’s response remains legendary: he appealed to the nation to skip one meal a day. Millions of middle-class households complied, choosing temporary hunger over the sacrifice of national dignity. Today, India faces a modern equivalent in the energy sector, yet the leadership’s response stands in stark contrast to that era of self-reliance.