Skip to main content

Pahalgam bleeds: A valley mourns, a community blamed

By Aaqib Javid 
What happened in Pahalgam will be etched into the memory of this valley for years to come.
In the lap of Kashmir’s majestic mountains, an unimaginable act of violence unfolded. Armed infiltrators opened fire without warning, without mercy, and without humanity—indiscriminately targeting both locals and tourists. In mere moments, lives were lost. Families shattered. And a region already fatigued by decades of suffering was left in shock once again.
While investigators are still piecing together who these attackers were and what agenda they followed, social media has already drawn its own conclusions. Even before the facts could emerge, a wave of hate took over online platforms, with many accusing the local Muslim community of supporting or sheltering the perpetrators.
As a Kashmiri—and as a human being—I ask: How long must we bleed before someone hears us instead of blaming us?
The Horror on the Ground
Eyewitness accounts from the scene paint a picture that is hard to comprehend. Screams echoed through the valley. Blood stained the earth where, just hours before, children had played and tourists had photographed the tranquil river.
One heartbreaking account stood out: a woman, barely able to speak through her tears, described how the terrorists questioned her husband’s identity. They said he "didn’t look like a Muslim"—and shot him dead right in front of her.
This was not just an attack. It was a targeted massacre. A deliberate attempt to instill fear, fuel division, and weaponize religion. And perhaps most dangerously, to pit communities against one another.
But as the bullets tore through bodies, they did not distinguish between Hindu or Muslim. Among those killed were Kashmiri Muslims. Among them were Hindu tourists. All of them were innocent.
A Valley Known for Warmth, Now Under Suspicion
What followed the attack has been equally devastating in another way. Instead of collective grief and a united call for justice, the internet erupted with hate. Hashtags blaming Muslims, trolling Kashmiris, and wild theories about “locals helping terrorists” began trending.
It’s a familiar and tragic story—grief hijacked by propaganda, where the victims are turned into suspects.
Let me say this with absolute clarity: Kashmiris, especially the Muslim community, had no hand in this attack. We condemn it in the strongest terms—not out of obligation, but because we are heartbroken. We are the ones lighting candles. We are the ones burying the dead. And we are the ones being accused, all at once.
Kashmiris are known around the world for their hospitality—for serving kehwa to strangers, offering rooms to stranded travelers, and treating guests as family. It is absurd to believe that this same community would suddenly turn into monsters overnight. That narrative is not just false—it is malicious.
The Intent to Divide—But Not on Our Watch
This incident feels like a calculated attempt to tear apart the fragile social fabric that still binds Kashmir together. For decades—despite everything—Hindus and Muslims in the valley have lived side by side, celebrated festivals together, and mourned losses together. Attacks like these, and the polarizing responses that follow, seem designed to destroy that harmony.
But it won’t work.
We refuse to hate our neighbors. We know each other too well. We’ve shared food, laughter, and pain. And now, we must share the burden of this tragedy—not by pointing fingers, but by standing together.
Kashmiri Muslim leaders, social activists, and everyday citizens have publicly condemned the attack. Candlelight vigils have been held across the valley—attended not only by the public but supported by political leaders, many of whom belong to the very communities being unfairly accused.
That unity matters. It shows the world that we are not divided—and we will not let terrorists or hate-fueled tweets divide us.
This is not the first time Kashmiris have spoken out against terrorism. Every time horror has struck—whether from across the border or within—our people have risen to condemn it. We have mourned, we have marched, and we demand justice. Because we have suffered enough.
The Missing Conversation: Security Lapses
While blame spreads like wildfire on the internet, few are asking the questions that truly matter—chief among them: Why was this allowed to happen?
Pahalgam is not just a local getaway—it is one of Kashmir’s most popular tourist destinations, located near the border and prone to infiltration. It should be under constant surveillance. Yet, according to multiple reports, army bunkers in the area were either unmanned or inadequately staffed. No active patrols were present in the mountain zone where the attack occurred.
Why weren’t troops stationed to safeguard the area—especially with an increase in tourist activity?
This is not about placing blame on the defense forces—it’s about accountability. Protecting civilians is the state’s responsibility. If there were security lapses that allowed this massacre to happen, they must be acknowledged, investigated, and urgently addressed.
We need answers. We need reform. And we need protection.
A Cry for Peace and Dignity
More than anything, what Kashmiris long for right now is peace. We are exhausted. For decades, we have lived under the shadow of fear—caught between violence from all sides. We have lost lives, livelihoods, and our voice.
But through it all, we have held onto hope. Hope that one day we, too, will be allowed to live freely, safely, and with dignity.
We are not asking for sympathy—we are asking for understanding.
We are not asking for praise—we are asking for fairness.
And we are certainly not asking to be judged by the actions of murderers we neither supported nor sheltered.
The government must reflect. The investigation must be swift, transparent, and rooted in truth. And the narrative—especially on digital platforms—must be shaped by facts, not by fear.
The victims of this attack were human beings. Their lives mattered. Their deaths must not be reduced to political talking points. We must honor them by demanding truth and standing united—not by deepening divides.
Final Words
Pahalgam is grieving. Kashmir is grieving. But amidst the mourning, a dangerous fire of division is being lit.
We—the people—must be the ones to put it out. Not with more anger, but with action. With solidarity. With empathy. With courage.
Because no matter where we come from or what faith we follow, terrorism is our shared enemy. And peace is our shared right.
Let’s not allow bullets to dictate our future. Let truth, justice, and humanity lead us forward.
---
Aaqib Javid is a medical student from Kupwara, Kashmir
 

Comments

TRENDING

Was Netaji forced to alter face, die in obscurity in USSR in 1975? Was he so meek?

  By Rajiv Shah   This should sound almost hilarious. Not only did Subhas Chandra Bose not die in a plane crash in Taipei, nor was he the mysterious Gumnami Baba who reportedly passed away on 16 September 1985 in Ayodhya, but we are now told that he actually died in 1975—date unknown—“in oblivion” somewhere in the former Soviet Union. Which city? Moscow? No one seems to know.

Love letters in a lifelong war: Babusha Kohli’s resistance in verse

By Ravi Ranjan*  “War does not determine who is right—only who is left.” Bertrand Russell’s words echo hauntingly in our times, and few contemporary Hindi poets embody this truth as profoundly as Babusha Kohli. Emerging from Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, Kohli has carved a unique space in literature by weaving together tenderness, protest, and philosophy across poetry, prose, and cinema. Her work is not merely artistic expression—it is resistance, refuge, and a call for peace.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Asbestos contamination in children’s products highlights global oversight gaps

By A Representative   A commentary published by the International Ban Asbestos Secretariat (IBAS) has drawn attention to the challenges governments face in responding effectively to global public-health risks. In an article written by Laurie Kazan-Allen and published on March 5, 2026, the author examines how the discovery of asbestos contamination in children’s play products has raised questions about regulatory oversight and international product safety. The article opens by reflecting on lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic, noting that governments in several countries were slow to respond to early warning signs of the crisis. Referring to the experience of the United Kingdom, the author writes that delays in implementing protective measures contributed to “232,112 recorded deaths and over a million people suffering from long Covid.” The commentary uses this example to illustrate what it describes as the dangers of underestimating emerging threats. Attention then turns...

Echoes of Vietnam and Chile: The devastating cost of the I-A Axis in Iran

​ By Ram Puniyani  ​The recent joint military actions by Israel and the United States against Iran have been devastating. Like all wars, this conflict is brutal to its core, leaving a trail of human suffering in its wake. The stated pretext for this aggression—the brutality of the Ayatollah Khamenei regime and its nuclear ambitions—clashes sharply with the reality of the diplomatic landscape. Iran had expressed a willingness to remain at the negotiating table, signaling a readiness to concede points emerging from dialogue. 

Authoritarian destruction of the public sphere in Ecuador: Trumpism in action?

By Pilar Troya Fernández  The situation in Ecuador under Daniel Noboa's government is one of authoritarianism advancing on several fronts simultaneously to consolidate neoliberalism and total submission to the US international agenda. These are not isolated measures, but rather a coordinated strategy that combines job insecurity, the dismantling of the welfare state, unrestricted access to mining, the continuation of oil exploitation without environmental considerations, the centralization of power through the financial suffocation of local governments, and the systematic criminalization of all forms of opposition and popular organization.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

The kitchen as prison: A feminist elegy for domestic slavery

By Garima Srivastava* Kumar Ambuj stands as one of the most incisive voices in contemporary Hindi poetry. His work, stripped of ornamentation, speaks directly to the lived realities of India’s marginalized—women, the rural poor, and those crushed under invisible forms of violence. His celebrated poem “Women Who Cook” (Khānā Banātī Striyāṃ) is not merely about food preparation; it is a searing indictment of patriarchal domestic structures that reduce women’s existence to endless, unpaid labour.

The price of silence: Why Modi won’t follow Shastri, appeal for sacrifice

By Arundhati Dhuru, Sandeep Pandey*  ​In 1965, as India grappled with war and a crippling food crisis, Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri faced a United States that used wheat shipments under the PL-480 agreement as a lever to dictate Indian foreign policy. Shastri’s response remains legendary: he appealed to the nation to skip one meal a day. Millions of middle-class households complied, choosing temporary hunger over the sacrifice of national dignity. Today, India faces a modern equivalent in the energy sector, yet the leadership’s response stands in stark contrast to that era of self-reliance.